ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?
-
@antipodean they went through our structures but end up in Japan, earning top money and play for their country.
Our structures will never change. Youngsters like SMZ and BJD played CC last year.
-
@Windows97 I am just trying to paint the Springboks picture. Sorry if it upset you.
-
@OomPB said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
@antipodean they went through our structures but end up in Japan, earning top money and play for their country.
Our structures will never change. Youngsters like SMZ and BJD played CC last year.
I think that may be the difference in that our pathways aren't a like. There's considerable discussion around the demise of the NPC and our reliance on Super Rugby which is effectively four NZ teams versus the Brumbies.
Hopefully the demise of the Rebels and strengthening of the Reds and Tahs bolsters the competition, but I feel we can't follow SA when the foundations aren't the same.
-
I think the players should be allowed to go out and earn what they are worth. The current NZR position is a restraint on their trade.
Super Rugby is not the competition it was. Allowing more players to play in the big European leagues would give them more experience of playing in high pressure, close games in front of big crowds.
Argentina are world football champions despite (or perhaps because of) most of their players playing club football in Europe. A lot of the Springbok squad play outside South Africa.
I think a lot of players would stay in New Zealand for lifestyle reasons so they'd still be stars in Super Rugby and the NPC.
-
@sparky there's no restraint on their trade; they're free to play their trade anywhere.
-
@Nepia said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
@DaGrubster said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
@stodders said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
@DaGrubster Smith is still good enough I'd bet to bring off the bench to close out a game.
Over the next 12-18 months, he could pass on his experience and mentor the new long term 9s. Same goes for Retallick.
TKB is still plenty good enough for the ABs. Frizell too (unless he has had the mother of all drop offs).
Let the man retire at the age of 35!
TKB was barely good enough when he was in the ABs 10 years.
I can't work out which is the stupidest comment, this one, or @stodders one about Frizell.
Me nethier….what an idiot!
-
@antipodean And yet, they lose out on earnings that they could make playing international rugby for their home country if they do sign with a European club. No wonder James Lowe and Bundee Aki opted to play for Ireland and Uini Antonio opted to play for France. That's three world-class talents the NZR position lost right there. They won't be the last.
-
@OomPB said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
@sparky Sione Tuipulotu
Born in Australia
-
@sparky said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
@antipodean And yet, they lose out on earnings that they could make playing international rugby for their home country if they do sign with a European club. No wonder James Lowe and Bundee Aki opted to play for Ireland and Uini Antonio opted to play for France. That's three world-class talents the NZR position lost right there. They won't be the last.
The players mentioned were in the Nz system. James Lowe may have become an AB at some point and Ali was behind Nonu, Williams and Crotty and the all Blacks had unbelievable depth and one of their best evert squads. So you can understand some people leaving as they didn’t see a pathway to the ABs at that point.
Not everything is black and white and they may not have become the players they have without going to a new enviroment and playing in Ireland.
The Nz policy has worked for a long time and it has rarely been an issue for NZ as they have mostly been able to keep the players they wanted to keep.
Of course things evolve and perhaps now is the time to look at changing it. I am on record as wanting to allow a couple of squad positions open to overseas players if needed.
If the NZR business plan has one weakness, it is that the whole thing is dependant on the All Blacks continuing to be the All Blacks i.e being the best, winning trophies and keeping that mystique about them.
Which is why they need to ensure that they have the best AB team they can put out and I think we have got to the point where some overseas players would improve our squad.
-
@DaGrubster said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
Which is why they need to ensure that they have the best AB team they can put out and I think we have got to the point where some overseas players would improve our squad.
We've let Super run down to the point where it isn't as good at preparing players for Tests.
I know I'm in a minority, but for rugby reasons NZR should have fought tooth and nail to keep SA in Super. The utter arrogance of thinking they could build their own comp, drag in the 'good' Aussie sides without national body support is astonishing. It's been so short sighted it is a colossal failure.
-
Our only real advantage is centrally contracted players managing workloads and being prepped to peak at the right time. Players being contracted primarily to clubs is a headache for NH unions - they have to negotiate to get them, and things like camps are bloody hard.
Pick overseas players and kill your local comp. To be the best oyu have to play the best. Super used to be the best. Now NH comps are the best. And you see that with the international results.
It's no surprise that 2015 SF were all SANZAAR unions. We took that and went backwards - while NH got into gear and lifted their game. Can we do the same?
I think the quality would drop even more if this gets allowed ... it is fundamentally incompatible with Super as a
-
@nzzp said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
@DaGrubster said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
Which is why they need to ensure that they have the best AB team they can put out and I think we have got to the point where some overseas players would improve our squad.
We've let Super run down to the point where it isn't as good at preparing players for Tests.
I know I'm in a minority, but for rugby reasons NZR should have fought tooth and nail to keep SA in Super. The utter arrogance of thinking they could build their own comp, drag in the 'good' Aussie sides without national body support is astonishing. It's been so short sighted it is a colossal failure.
COVID 19 did not help there. There had been rumblings for years and the pandemic gave them the perfect opportunity to make the move. I believe it has helped them and hindered us
-
@nzzp said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
@DaGrubster said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
We've let Super run down to the point where it isn't as good at preparing players for Tests.
I know this is commonly accepted as fact, but I do think it stands in pretty stark opposition to the fact that the Boks have a heap of players in Japan playing, at best, super-lite who step up to test rugby just fine.
-
In the long run protectionism never works. Give the players their freedom and let the animal spirits fire an All Black revival.
I'd be really excited to see the players taking back to the All Blacks environment what they've learned from the best club competitions, teams and coaches from around the world. Being trapped in Super Snore ain't letting the players progress.
-
@nzzp said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
@DaGrubster said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
Which is why they need to ensure that they have the best AB team they can put out and I think we have got to the point where some overseas players would improve our squad.
We've let Super run down to the point where it isn't as good at preparing players for Tests.
I know I'm in a minority, but for rugby reasons NZR should have fought tooth and nail to keep SA in Super. The utter arrogance of thinking they could build their own comp, drag in the 'good' Aussie sides without national body support is astonishing. It's been so short sighted it is a colossal failure.
Agreed, the herald is of the opinion that NZR saw the opportunity to ‘own super rugby’ so they had a shiny product to entice private equity.
While super rugby across the 5 nations wasn’t possible during Covid, there is no reason why we couldn’t have agreed with partners that we all do our own thing until we can reconvene when it is possible to do so.
SA got lucky as they had a comp to go to that was improving in quality all the time and super shat the bed as Aus teams quality fell of a cliff at the same time.
-
@nzzp said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
@DaGrubster said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
Which is why they need to ensure that they have the best AB team they can put out and I think we have got to the point where some overseas players would improve our squad.
We've let Super run down to the point where it isn't as good at preparing players for Tests.
I know I'm in a minority, but for rugby reasons NZR should have fought tooth and nail to keep SA in Super. The utter arrogance of thinking they could build their own comp, drag in the 'good' Aussie sides without national body support is astonishing. It's been so short sighted it is a colossal failure.
Huge
-
I find it very interesting that a country as innovative as NZ now feels it needs to send its players north to develop their rugby brains
You have the cattle
You need to innovate and find the style which suits your players’ bodies & brains which also breaks down the other teams’ defences regularly
Like in the past
You, SA, England, Ireland and France can all beat each other on any given day
Even though you boys are sulking, this is the most competitive rugby has been in decades
And it’s brilliant
-
@MiketheSnow said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
You need to innovate and find the style which suits your players’ bodies & brains which also breaks down the other teams’ defences regularly
One of the strengths of SR has become a weakness. Generally all the NZ sides play a very similar pattern and there is top down involvement from NZR to all the sides
That's great if the national side is run by Henry, Smith & Hansen and they are the ones setting the blueprint.
What happens when the style of play needs an overhaul. How slow is that process?
I'd like to see more experiments at SR level. Do the younger coaches have that ability or are they all taught to coach the same way? Does it take a Cotter style coach returning from offshore to have the knowledge and confidence to try something else? Perhaps more teams would enable more experiments too?
The national side trying to use a SR gameplan (that works against SR sides) is not having the same level of success. They now need to learn fast at Test level. That's why I was always in favour of more overseas experience in the coaching group.. even if Robertson was head coach he should not have been allowed to load his team with his SR assistants and contemporaries. One or two coaches who'd learnt some tough lessons at Test level with an inferior squad would add a different perspective
-
