All Blacks v Argentina II
-
@NTA said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
@Crucial said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
If there was a critical moment it wasn't at the end, it was when we were penalised at a lineout setting up a drive for the line. The players involved were completely puzzled in that they did nothing different than usual and can tell if the timing of a much practiced facet is out.
Which is a shame on the back of mauls not being refereed correctly for donkeys. Suddenly the illegal thing you were doing all along gets the whistle.
It was very much a hairline call. Arg defender wrapped in from the side and connected with the lifter. Certainly wasn't an obvious one where the lifter steps around in front of the catcher at all.
Yes, possibly illegal by strict interpretation, but if so I haven't seen a legal maul from a line out in a very long time. -
@KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
Interesting the 'injured' starting props from last week that 'had' to come off the field are fit to play this week.....
They were keeping our powder dry for this weekend. Because obviously we were going to win without them.
-
They couldn't string together a coherent story if they tried at this point. Bringing BB back in makes total sense but I feel for Perofeta. If only the coaches held themselves to account like they've done with Taylor.
-
@Paekakboyz said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
They couldn't string together a coherent story if they tried at this point. Bringing BB back in makes total sense but I feel for Perofeta. If only the coaches held themselves to account like they've done with Taylor.
It’s pro rugby. You need to be ruthless. He should have done WAY more in his 50 seconds on the field than he did.
Totally his own fault.
-
@Paekakboyz said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
@MN5 you're being generous mate, he had 55 seconds ffs!! I mean if you can't save a game in under a minute you don't really have any business being an AB!
He was in a perfect position to do this. Absolutely hopeless
-
@MN5 said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
In the past coaches would have made wholesale changes after a historic home loss to Argentina ( not forgetting a historic series loss to Ireland prior to that )
We really don't have that option/luxury any more. Collectively they don't have the confidence and are constantly striving not to lose.
-
@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
they obviously dont see savea as a 7 at all anymore
When was the last time he played 7 at Test level?
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
they obviously dont see savea as a 7 at all anymore
When was the last time he played 7 at Test level?
Last year vs Argies
I actually liked how that loose forward trio played too (Blackadder, Savea, Sotutu)
-
@ACT-Crusader Having no.7 on your jersey and playing like an openside aren't the same thing.
-
@Bovidae said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
@ACT-Crusader Having no.7 on your jersey and playing like an openside aren't the same thing.
Isn’t it? Well gee, I’ve learned something new today. 😉
The question was specifically about the number 7…
-
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
they obviously dont see savea as a 7 at all anymore
When was the last time he played 7 at Test level?
Last year vs Argies
I actually liked how that loose forward trio played too (Blackadder, Savea, Sotutu)
you mean someone playing like a 7 at 7...someone playing like a 6 at 6....and someone playing like an 8 at 8....madness
-
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
they obviously dont see savea as a 7 at all anymore
When was the last time he played 7 at Test level?
Last year vs Argies
I actually liked how that loose forward trio played too (Blackadder, Savea, Sotutu)
I remember all their Dads playing NPC back in the late 90s too.
-
@Tim said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
Argentina: Juan Cruz Mallia, Emiliano Boffelli, Matias Moroni, Matias Orlando, Santiago Cordero, Santiago Carreras, Tomas Cubelli, Pablo Matera, Marcos Kremer, Santiago Grondona, Tomas Lavanini, Guido Petti, Joel Sclavi, Julian Montoya (c), Thomas Gallo.
Reserves: Santiago Socino, Mayco Vivas, Eduardo Bello, Matias Alemanno, Juan Martin Gonzalez Samso, Gonzalo Bertranou, Benjamin Urdapilleta, Lucio Cinti.
The usually exuberant Cheika was somewhat lost for words when informed of the tattoo on Thursday morning after making four changes – at blindside, halfback, lock and left wing – to his team for the return test against the All Blacks in Hamilton on Saturday.
Pumas pack much more effective when Petti joined so that change I expected.
-
@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
@Stargazer said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
@Chris Apart from Taylor, I don't think the players are the problem.
Game plan, and how it is communicated to the players (lack of clear messaging), and defence seem to be the main issues IMO. That's on the coaches, particularly Foster and Mcleod.
yes, thoeretically you're right...but its still pretty worrying that these guys havent taken it on themselves to sort it out on the field if what the coaches are telling them isn;t working again...and again
was it in the foster thread someone posted that he had pretty much said theyre not doing what hes telling them
something has to bloody change
Seem to recall in sheds at half time in 2003 RWC final Johnson saying, 'Fuck off, Clive'. Senior players need to be problem solvers.
-
I'm enjoying the selection process. Well, the meta aspects. Foster offers up so much that other coaches just don't.
If the ABs play well, do they keep the same team for Bled 1? That would be normal.
If the ABs play badly, do the they keep the same team? That would be unusual, but very Foster. How would he justify changes now? All other losses have seen minimal changes.
So we potentially go into the last game with Australia with a team that has played all season, and reserves with zero game time.
-
@Chester-Draws said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
I'm enjoying the selection process. Well, the meta aspects. Foster offers up so much that other coaches just don't.
If the ABs play well, do they keep the same team for Bled 1? That would be normal.
If the ABs play badly, do the they keep the same team? That would be unusual, but very Foster. How would he justify changes now? All other losses have seen minimal changes.
So we potentially go into the last game with Australia with a team that has played all season, and reserves with zero game time.
That sounds like Foster Logic.
-
@Duluth said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
@Derpus said in All Blacks v Argentina II:
Setting aside all else - I just cant follow the reasoning behind having a third openside and a specialist centre on the bench?
There's only two guys that regularly play openside. Ardie will likely play 80mins at no8 again. Papali'i covers 6 & 7. SF covers 6 & 8. Also S Barrett covers 6
QT is easy to explain. Barrett covers 10 & 15, Reiko covers wing. There's no need for additional outside back cover
And Kramer for 80 will be all over Ardie like a cheap Italian suit.