• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Springboks v All Blacks I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.5k Posts 101 Posters 111.9k Views
Springboks v All Blacks I
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #244

    @ACT-Crusader said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    I wouldn’t be surprised if we started with:

    Bower, Sami T, Ta’avao, Va’ai, Whitelock, S. Barrett, Cane, Savea

    De Groot, Taylor, Newell, A. Ioane, Papalii

    alt text

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #245

    @ACT-Crusader said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    I wouldn’t be surprised if we started with:

    Bower, Sami T, Ta’avao, Va’ai, Whitelock, S. Barrett, Cane, Savea

    De Groot, Taylor, Newell, A. Ioane, Papalii

    That's more or less what I was suggesting yesterday.

    Might be next week's selection if we lose.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #246

    @mariner4life said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    A backline of

    Smith, Mo’unga, Fainga’anuku, Havili, Goodhue, Reece, Jordan

    Bench: Christie, B. Barrett, R. Ioane

    And if it goes pear shape, the Fern will have plenty of fun. I will go into hiding…

    poor from you

    what happened to the halfback being "A Highlander"

    Standards are slipping everywhere

    It’s not easy under Albanese 😉

    It’s T. Lander.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #247

    @Winger said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    A backline of

    Smith, Mo’unga, Fainga’anuku, Havili, Goodhue, Reece, Jordan

    Bench: Christie, B. Barrett, R. Ioane

    And if it goes pear shape, the Fern will have plenty of fun. I will go into hiding…

    Robertson's not AB head coach yet.

    I know, that’s why I didn’t name Bryn Hall

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    Old Samurai Jack
    wrote on last edited by
    #248

    I thought it has been made clear that Ryan has nothing to do with team selection yet.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Old Samurai Jack on last edited by
    #249

    @Old-Samurai-Jack I think it would be impossible to have a forward coach with zero input into the seleciton of the forward pack...recipe for disaster...

    so on thinking, yeah thats probably exactly what happens...the selectors pick thier team and ask the forwards coach to work with them.

    ACT CrusaderA CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
    6
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #250

    @taniwharugby I know cynicism is at an all time high right now, but I think it’s a little more organic than that. There would be regular communication amongst the coaches on who and what is working, how players are pulling up etc.

    He may not be sitting at the table (just yet) when the team is finally decided but all the input will factor in.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #251

    The selectors don't name the 23, so it's irrelevant whether he's a selector or not. Selector is only involved in selecting the entire squad

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #252

    @Machpants said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    The selectors don't name the 23, so it's irrelevant whether he's a selector or not. Selector is only involved in selecting the entire squad

    I don't believe that's true. Fox made it pretty clear during the Irish series he's involved in the team selections.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #253

    @ACT-Crusader well the 2nd part of my post was pure sarcasm, I do not honestly believe the forwards coach would have no input into the selection of the pack.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #254

    @Tim he kept talking about moving rocks or did I miss hear him. Using Korg for inspiration.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #255

    @nzzp One thing Barrett is trying to do is take on the line so that the back line is less predictable although they are predictable. Moanga needs space and is a flyweight. Possibly better when everyone is fatigued.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #256

    @taniwharugby said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @Old-Samurai-Jack I think it would be impossible to have a forward coach with zero input into the seleciton of the forward pack...recipe for disaster...

    so on thinking, yeah thats probably exactly what happens...the selectors pick thier team and ask the forwards coach to work with them.

    Ryan himself said that he would only be concentrating on aspects of the forward play. He hasn't had time to do lineout, scrum, maul attack, maul defence and interplay. As @ACT-Crusader says, he will have had input eg this group or this guy are doing this aspect well but I doubt he gets final say

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #257

    @KiwiMurph said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @Machpants said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    The selectors don't name the 23, so it's irrelevant whether he's a selector or not. Selector is only involved in selecting the entire squad

    I don't believe that's true. Fox made it pretty clear during the Irish series he's involved in the team selections.

    I blame Fox

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to broughie on last edited by
    #258

    @broughie said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @nzzp One thing Barrett is trying to do is take on the line so that the back line is less predictable although they are predictable. Moanga needs space and is a flyweight. Possibly better when everyone is fatigued.

    His tendency to go backwards to find a hole is a bit disastrous at Test level. And that’s ignoring that he needs to be hidden on defence.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #259

    @Crucial said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @taniwharugby said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @Old-Samurai-Jack I think it would be impossible to have a forward coach with zero input into the seleciton of the forward pack...recipe for disaster...

    so on thinking, yeah thats probably exactly what happens...the selectors pick thier team and ask the forwards coach to work with them.

    Ryan himself said that he would only be concentrating on aspects of the forward play. He hasn't had time to do lineout, scrum, maul attack, maul defence and interplay. As @ACT-Crusader says, he will have had input eg this group or this guy are doing this aspect well but I doubt he gets final say

    yeah I covered that off in my post.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    game_film
    wrote on last edited by game_film
    #260

    Looking at the photo (top left) it might give a clue as to the back line. Or not. Speculate away.

    Billy TellB CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #261

    @ACT-Crusader said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @KiwiMurph said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @Machpants said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    The selectors don't name the 23, so it's irrelevant whether he's a selector or not. Selector is only involved in selecting the entire squad

    I don't believe that's true. Fox made it pretty clear during the Irish series he's involved in the team selections.

    I blame Fox

    You spelled "Deans" wrong ..

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #262

    @mariner4life said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    Call me arrogant, but i firmly believe the result on Saturday is more down to us than them.

    Far from arrogant, you’re being wonderfully generous. Takes all the pressure off the boks and us poor unfortunates who support them.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    replied to game_film on last edited by
    #263

    @game_film said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    Looking at the photo (top left) it might give a clue as to the back line. Or not. Speculate away.

    4 backs is certainly a novel tactic.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Springboks v All Blacks I
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.