• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Foster, Robertson etc

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
5.7k Posts 131 Posters 740.9k Views
Foster, Robertson etc
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #4427

    Scott Robertson clearly has enemies in high places

    Scott Robertson clearly has enemies in high places

    We have to assume that this iteration of the All Blacks and New Zealand Rugby (NZR) don’t want Scott Robertson around.

    CrucialC A 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #4428

    @Bones said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    Scott Robertson clearly has enemies in high places

    Scott Robertson clearly has enemies in high places

    We have to assume that this iteration of the All Blacks and New Zealand Rugby (NZR) don’t want Scott Robertson around.

    One of the most stupid articles Bidwell has ever written and that's saying something.
    "If they wanted him in the national set up he would be there by now." - Razor doesn't want to work with anyone other than his own team.
    "We hounded Warren Gatland out of this country." - really?
    "We made it clear to Jamie Joseph and Tony Brown and Dave Rennie that they had no future here." - Um, no. They were offered other opportunities and decided not to be dogs with two bones.

    Article reads like the post of a pissy fans, ignoring facts to make a point.

    Dan54D taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    12
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #4429

    @Crucial Like the fact he conveniently avoids mentioning that Razor is actually contracted to NZR, (extra to his Crusaders deal) until 2024. Man and people actually think the shit some of these jokers write is based on fact?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #4430

    @Crucial we know NZR's handling of this hasnt been great, but some of the shite our media are coming out with is worse!

    Razr has stated his preferred job, is with the ABs, you would expect NZR are working on things post RWC already as well.

    So while I dont have much faith in NZR after some of the poor decisions of the past years, this is one that surely even they cant bungle.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    ploughboy
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #4431

    @taniwharugby if they at least dont have discusstions with j joseph i would be pissed off

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to ploughboy on last edited by
    #4432

    @ploughboy is he coming off contract? You'd think Japan wouldn't be keen to let him go, and Japan must be almost home to him now?

    But agree, I do hope they are reaching out to guys like him as well, I mean imagine if we could get him and Razr on the same team 🙂

    P Dan54D 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    ploughboy
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #4433

    @taniwharugby i f you dont ask you never know
    zero chance of getting them on same team

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #4434

    @Bones said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    Scott Robertson clearly has enemies in high places

    Scott Robertson clearly has enemies in high places

    We have to assume that this iteration of the All Blacks and New Zealand Rugby (NZR) don’t want Scott Robertson around.

    Atrocious article but as expected from this writer.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to ploughboy on last edited by Victor Meldrew
    #4435

    @ploughboy said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @taniwharugby i f you dont ask you never know
    zero chance of getting them on same team

    I wonder if the alleged inability of Robertson and Joseph to work with others is/was perceived as a negative, lack of teamwork issue by NZR?

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #4436

    @Victor-Meldrew almost certainly, personally i dont think its out of line for the top job, an assistant doesn't get a say on who the head coach is....but a head coach gets a say on the assitant

    taniwharugbyT Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Windows97W Offline
    Windows97W Offline
    Windows97
    wrote on last edited by
    #4437

    To be fair working with others is one of Fozzie's strengths - as it appears he's willing to work with absolutely anyone at all who can keep him in the job.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • Windows97W Offline
    Windows97W Offline
    Windows97
    wrote on last edited by
    #4438

    However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.

    "Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"

    "Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".

    "Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".

    Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.

    CrucialC boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #4439

    @Kiwiwomble guess it depends, if the assistant is staying on (you'd assume Ryan will) then I am sure thier opinion on being able to work with the head coach is taken into account, but when they make thier application the HC needs to name his entire team doesnt he?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Windows97 on last edited by
    #4440

    @Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.

    "Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"

    "Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".

    "Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".

    Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.

    There's no paradox. Coaches have different methods and philosophies. It stands to reason that they won't necessarily all work well together. Same does apply to players in some circumstances. eg the three best loose forwards in the country may not create the best loose combination.
    Then you get coaches that are best at being head and those that can assist.
    Last thing we want is another Hart/Wyllie scenario.

    ChrisC Windows97W 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #4441

    @Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.

    "Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"

    "Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".

    "Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".

    Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.

    There's no paradox. Coaches have different methods and philosophies. It stands to reason that they won't necessarily all work well together. Same does apply to players in some circumstances. eg the three best loose forwards in the country may not create the best loose combination.
    Then you get coaches that are best at being head and those that can assist.
    Last thing we want is another Hart/Wyllie scenario.

    To have a vision were you want to go and get results a mission statement driven by One HC works the best IMO.

    Victor MeldrewV CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Windows97 on last edited by
    #4442

    @Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.

    "Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"

    "Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".

    "Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".

    Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.

    A coach may have differing opinions as to who is the best 23.

    Not talking specifics, but attitude and ability to work within a given team is part of what makes up "the best".

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #4443

    @taniwharugby said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @ploughboy is he coming off contract? You'd think Japan wouldn't be keen to let him go, and Japan must be almost home to him now?

    But agree, I do hope they are reaching out to guys like him as well, I mean imagine if we could get him and Razr on the same team 🙂

    Would be good but suspect egos may get in the way?

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Dan54 on last edited by
    #4444

    @Dan54 said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @taniwharugby said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @ploughboy is he coming off contract? You'd think Japan wouldn't be keen to let him go, and Japan must be almost home to him now?

    But agree, I do hope they are reaching out to guys like him as well, I mean imagine if we could get him and Razr on the same team 🙂

    Would be good but suspect egos may get in the way?

    Both JJ and Razor want to be HC and won't accept an assistant role. So is international experience with Japan more telling than 6 SR titles with the Crusaders? There are no guarantees with either option. But considering one of Razor's lieutenants is already doing well in the AB setup I agree with Gatland that Razor has earned his opportunity

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #4445

    @canefan said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    So is international experience with Japan more telling than 6 SR titles with the Crusaders?

    I'd say that 3-4 titles and 2-3 years coaching Japan would be better than either.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #4446

    @booboo said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    @Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:

    However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.

    "Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"

    "Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".

    "Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".

    Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.

    A coach may have differing opinions as to who is the best 23.

    Not talking specifics, but attitude and ability to work within a given team is part of what makes up "the best".

    ….and what province/SR franchise they come from….

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

Foster, Robertson etc
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.