• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders v Blues

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadersblues
637 Posts 59 Posters 43.5k Views
Crusaders v Blues
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to TJ on last edited by
    #439

    @tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

    Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

    Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

    Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

    Yeah, he wilted a bit under the pressure. Good experience for him to improve from.

    I prefer Sullivan at 15, but Perofeta has been good for us at ten.

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #440

    @kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

    Our looses completely dominated theirs.

    Not being a dick here, but honestly didn't notice Blackadder at all. Big Red had his number.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Steven Harris on last edited by
    #441

    @steven-harris said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @dan54 great for the comp ,and just the game it needed , canโ€™t wait to see the sky ratings

    Where the hell do you ever find Sky ratings!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    TJ
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #442

    @kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

    Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

    Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

    Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

    Yeah, he wilted a bit under the pressure. Good experience for him to improve from.

    I prefer Sullivan at 15, but Perofeta has been good for us at ten.

    Absolutely, think he is a good player and will learn from it, but definitely the right call to take him off in this game

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #443

    Hats off to Goodhue as well. Outplayed some All Blacks this year.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote on last edited by
    #444

    I am prepared to say I pretty keen to see Dalton have a run at 6 sometime, in saying that he was brilliant tonight at 7.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #445

    @tim said in Crusaders v Blues:

    Hats off to Goodhue as well. Outplayed some All Blacks this year.

    Absolutely. Iโ€™ve been critical of him in the past.. particularly his lack of physicality. Not this year.

    Heโ€™s responded really well to being a senior lock

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to TJ on last edited by
    #446

    @tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

    Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

    Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

    Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

    No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to TJ on last edited by
    #447

    @tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

    Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

    Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

    Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

    He was at fullback, and may have been overplaying at times. But at that point BB was kicking very poorly, and Perofeta is more calculating.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #448

    I really like the look of Sullivan, he seems to have space and time and that boot is incredible. I hope he continues to develop in the Blues environment.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #449

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

    Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

    Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

    Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

    No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.

    So your solution is move the player missing easy kicks at goal and falling over chasing kicks to run the ship?

    BB was instrumental in us winning that game.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #450

    @tim said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

    Our looses completely dominated theirs.

    Not being a dick here, but honestly didn't notice Blackadder at all. Big Red had his number.

    I thought he had been subbed in the second half.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #451

    Grace was ok, but a long way behind Sotutu

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #452

    @kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

    Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

    Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

    Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

    No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.

    So your solution is move the player missing easy kicks at goal and falling over chasing kicks to run the ship?

    BB was instrumental in us winning that game.

    He was also instrumental in the crusaders nearly winning that game.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #453

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

    Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

    Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

    Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

    No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.

    So your solution is move the player missing easy kicks at goal and falling over chasing kicks to run the ship?

    BB was instrumental in us winning that game.

    He was also instrumental in the crusaders nearly winning that game.

    Again, the solution to that is not replacing him with a player playing worse.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    wrote on last edited by
    #454

    It's weird, I hardly ever notice Papali'i even when I am looking out for him. Maybe he needs a hair cut that stands out.

    BonesB KirwanK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #455

    @kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

    Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

    Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

    Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

    No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.

    So your solution is move the player missing easy kicks at goal and falling over chasing kicks to run the ship?

    BB was instrumental in us winning that game.

    He was also instrumental in the crusaders nearly winning that game.

    Again, the solution to that is not replacing him with a player playing worse.

    Worse? Nice try ๐Ÿ˜‚

    No you're right. Barrett closed it out perfectly.

    KirwanK T 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #456

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

    Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

    Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

    Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

    No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.

    So your solution is move the player missing easy kicks at goal and falling over chasing kicks to run the ship?

    BB was instrumental in us winning that game.

    He was also instrumental in the crusaders nearly winning that game.

    Again, the solution to that is not replacing him with a player playing worse.

    Worse? Nice try ๐Ÿ˜‚

    No you're right. Barrett closed it out perfectly.

    Looks at the scoreboard. Seems ok.

    BB played well.

    BonesB Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    TJ
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #457

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

    Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

    Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

    Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

    Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

    No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.

    So your solution is move the player missing easy kicks at goal and falling over chasing kicks to run the ship?

    BB was instrumental in us winning that game.

    He was also instrumental in the crusaders nearly winning that game.

    Again, the solution to that is not replacing him with a player playing worse.

    Worse? Nice try ๐Ÿ˜‚

    No you're right. Barrett closed it out perfectly.

    Absolutely he was playing worse.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #458

    @crazy-horse said in Crusaders v Blues:

    It's weird, I hardly ever notice Papali'i even when I am looking out for him. Maybe he needs a hair cut that stands out.

    That is pretty weird when anytime there's a big defensive play, he's there!

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    6

Crusaders v Blues
Rugby Matches
crusadersblues
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.