• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders v Hurricanes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
373 Posts 46 Posters 16.7k Views
Crusaders v Hurricanes
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to broughie on last edited by
    #287

    @broughie said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris really if you had a smarter team playing you would have lost. The Crusader mistique of old is lost.

    Maybe but winning ugly still keeps you on top.
    A long way to the Finals yet.

    broughieB BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #288

    @crazy-horse said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @antipodean said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    Those that came out of this fixture with their reputations tarnished:

    • Kirifi
    • Scrafton
    • Bridge.
    • Pickerill.

    So Bridge played well then?

    So Bridge still have some reputation to tarnish?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #289

    @chris but that Foster and he is average.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #290

    @chris Totally agree. Top 6 inches.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #291

    @chris said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @broughie said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris really if you had a smarter team playing you would have lost. The Crusader mistique of old is lost.

    Maybe but winning ugly still keeps you on top.
    A long way to the Finals yet.

    I really can't see the crusaders getting the same "luck" under non kiwi refs...

    ChrisC 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to broughie on last edited by
    #292

    @broughie said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris but that Foster and he is average.

    You are being to kind he is fucking useless.

    broughieB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #293

    @bones said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @broughie said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris really if you had a smarter team playing you would have lost. The Crusader mistique of old is lost.

    Maybe but winning ugly still keeps you on top.
    A long way to the Finals yet.

    I really can't see the crusaders getting the same "luck" under non kiwi refs...

    Well if it’s Murphy no NZ team will win he is worse than pick his nuts.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #294

    @chris He is useless. Maybe Crucial will defend him but I doubt it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #295

    @bones said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @broughie said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris really if you had a smarter team playing you would have lost. The Crusader mistique of old is lost.

    Maybe but winning ugly still keeps you on top.
    A long way to the Finals yet.

    I really can't see the crusaders getting the same "luck" under non kiwi refs...

    Come on don’t be like that the Landers will make the play offs.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #296

    @chris said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @bones said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @broughie said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris really if you had a smarter team playing you would have lost. The Crusader mistique of old is lost.

    Maybe but winning ugly still keeps you on top.
    A long way to the Finals yet.

    I really can't see the crusaders getting the same "luck" under non kiwi refs...

    Come on don’t be like that the Landers will make the play offs.

    It's our year!

    broughieB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #297

    @bones El heosos. You will be waiting long time.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to broughie on last edited by
    #298

    @broughie said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    El heosos

    You know I don't speak spangreek

    broughieB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to Bones on last edited by broughie
    #299

    @bones I speak spanglish.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #300

    @gt12 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @nepia said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    Why didn't they at least go to golden point?

    Because Ardie is a retard

    Who was it that was recently extolling Ardie as a crucial AB because of his leadership...?

    ToddyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #301

    @taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @gt12 looked like that call came from the coaches

    The retards who appointed another retard as their captain?

    Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    replied to junior on last edited by
    #302

    @junior He may not be a great captain but he's leading a team of mostly NPC players pretty well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #303

    @nepia said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    Why didn't they at least go to golden point?

    I think that was a reasonable call. You take the 3, you have a 90% chance of getting it but then it is a 50/50. The Hurricanes had a decent chance of scoring from that lineout at the end. I don't think it was 50/50 but at least 35%. It wasn't a shocking call.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to junior on last edited by
    #304

    @junior said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @gt12 looked like that call came from the coaches

    The retards who appointed another retard as their captain?

    Well I was yelling to do exactly what they did, what was point of going for a draw, play extra time and still maybe not win, and they got another game on Tuesday night??
    Sorry fellas , but to be calling people retards kind of shows something about you, especially when it was right call. If Jordie had taken kick attempt and missed you would be moaning for not goin to corner.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Dan54 on last edited by gt12
    #305

    @dan54 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @junior said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @gt12 looked like that call came from the coaches

    The retards who appointed another retard as their captain?

    Well I was yelling to do exactly what they did, what was point of going for a draw, play extra time and still maybe not win, and they got another game on Tuesday night??
    Sorry fellas , but to be calling people retards kind of shows something about you, especially when it was right call. If Jordie had taken kick attempt and missed you would be moaning for not goin to corner.

    The weakness in this analysis is that it was exactly one chance to score (time is up) versus 90% draw then a 50/50 with time to score or lose.

    How many lineout drive tries have the Canes scored this year? I honestly don’t know but I’ll bet it is zero (or basically that).

    Edit: @fooba seems to suggest it is zero
    https://www.forum.thesilverfern.com/topic/4719/hurricanes-2022/704

    Dan54D ToddyT 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • HigginsH Offline
    HigginsH Offline
    Higgins
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #306

    @machpants Very likely as my guys had about four or five guys come down with covid in the last couple of days and one other team had to pull out of their game today with about a dozen covid cases so it might be something sweeping through the Wellington rugby community at the moment.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Crusaders v Hurricanes
Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.