• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Klitschko, Fury, Parker, Takam & Joshua

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
fighting
560 Posts 61 Posters 75.5k Views
Klitschko, Fury, Parker, Takam & Joshua
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JKJ Offline
    JKJ Offline
    JK
    wrote on last edited by
    #154

    <p>Not the greatest but I was always a bit of a fan of Evander. This round (the 10th) from 92 vs Riddick Bowe is pretty amazing</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>

    </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • JKJ Offline
    JKJ Offline
    JK
    wrote on last edited by
    #155

    <p>Another cracking round of boxing is this one from 2002 Gatti vs Ward. They just keep on going</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>

    </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #156

    <p>that round lasted forever just watching, musta been like an hour to them!! </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #157

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MN5" data-cid="547022" data-time="1449733236">
    <div>
    <p>I was always a fan of the real old school sluggers like Jeffries, Dempsey and Marciano. Mind you Jack Johnson was basically the Ali of his era. I've never subscribed to the theory that modern fighters would beat them just because they were bigger.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I dont think its a matter of modern fighters being better , its just strength and power increases with evolution , its an old argument with all power sports I guess , </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>For example  how would Colin Meads go against Brodie Retallick , that type of thing </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #158

    <p>I cant pick a greatest , so many greats from all different eras ,and like other sports its hard to compare eras,</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>i like Ali for skill , his hand speed and footwork was something else, and we possibly didnt see the best of him with his stint in jail when he was at his peak, </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Tyson for power , at his best I dont think anyone could have stood there and exchanged  with him , not in early rounds anyway when he used to burst out of the blocks like a mad man </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • JKJ Offline
    JKJ Offline
    JK
    wrote on last edited by
    #159

    <p>Would have loved to see a 3 round slug fest of tua vs tyson. Doubt it would last 3 rounds.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Tua in his prime was amazing. Sure he fought a lot of bums but they all do in the early stages. The way Tua dealt to the likes of Ruiz and Moorer and the wins over Rahman and Maskaev was pretty dam impressive. Was a shame he didnt bring his a-game ve Lewis. That fight had some much potential but never came to the boil.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    wrote on last edited by
    #160

    To me the 'bigger,faster,stronger' stuff is more pertinent in Rugby. Much more so. I mean can anyone imagine the 75-80kg midfielders of yesteryear handling Nonu?<br><br>
    I reckon some of the older fighters could have slugged it out on an even keel with Tyson.....have a read of this tough bugger.....<br><br><a class="bbc_url" href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_J._Jeffries">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_J._Jeffries</a><br><br>
    Mind you, it's ultimately impossible to say and Tyson was damn scary in his prime.....hard to gauge Jeffries from shitty black and white footage.<br><br>
    JK, Tua did bring his A game he just couldn't grow any taller! I still reckon even getting a shot was a great achievement though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #161

    When you look at Fury, with that body he could easily be mistaken with the fighters of yesteryear. One thing with boxing is that it has been professional for more than a century. The tops guys could afford to do nothing but train. Yes there have been advances in training, conditioning, nutrition etc. but the fundamentals are still the same. You could perhaps also argue that there was a much bigger and better pool of talent back in the day. <br><br>
    Didn't they also use to fight an astonishing number of rounds in the early days? Like 50 or something.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #162

    <p>Fury is revelling in the publicity. This is brilliant.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.independent.ie/videos/sport/tyson-fury-im-mr-famous-now-34273794.html'>http://www.independent.ie/videos/sport/tyson-fury-im-mr-famous-now-34273794.html</a></p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #163

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Bovidae" data-cid="547148" data-time="1449798886">
    <div>
    <p>Fury is revelling in the publicity. This is brilliant.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.independent.ie/videos/sport/tyson-fury-im-mr-famous-now-34273794.html'>http://www.independent.ie/videos/sport/tyson-fury-im-mr-famous-now-34273794.html</a></p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Shame The Fast Show isn't still on. Perfect material.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    wrote on last edited by
    #164

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Rancid Schnitzel" data-cid="547137" data-time="1449796538"><p>
    When you look at Fury, with that body he could easily be mistaken with the fighters of yesteryear. One thing with boxing is that it has been professional for more than a century. The tops guys could afford to do nothing but train. Yes there have been advances in training, conditioning, nutrition etc. but the fundamentals are still the same. You could perhaps also argue that there was a much bigger and better pool of talent back in the day. <br>
    Didn't they also use to fight an astonishing number of rounds in the early days? Like 50 or something.</p></blockquote>
    Google images of Jack Johnson ( not the singer ) and Jim Jeffries ( not the comedian ) both of them have physiques seriously ahead of their time. Definitely a few weight sessions and steak meals in there along with awesome genetics.<br><br>
    As for the rounds, yes they did a ridiculous amount and some of those were fucken bare knuckled !?!?!<br><br>
    Again, ya can't compare eras but fuck those old fluffybunnies must have been tough.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #165

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MN5" data-cid="547072" data-time="1449781383">
    <div>
    <p>To me the 'bigger,faster,stronger' stuff is more pertinent in Rugby. Much more so. I mean can anyone imagine the 75-80kg midfielders of yesteryear handling Nonu?<br><br>
    I reckon some of the older fighters could have slugged it out on an even keel with Tyson.....have a read of this tough bugger.....<br><br><a class="bbc_url" href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_J._Jeffries">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_J._Jeffries</a><br><br>
    Mind you, it's ultimately impossible to say and Tyson was damn scary in his prime.....hard to gauge Jeffries from shitty black and white footage.<br><br>
    JK, Tua did bring his A game he just couldn't grow any taller! I still reckon even getting a shot was a great achievement though.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Marciano was a beast in his time , but fought at about 85  kilos ,( I find that hard to believe he was that small but thats what they tell us)  had a reach shorter than Mayweathers , I heard he only fought 2 guys that weighed more than 200 pounds ( 90 kilos)  , modern fighters are 110 plus now </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>He would be a small  cruiserweight now you would think , </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Absolute beast in his era , and not intending to take anything away from him because he is a legend,  but its hard to imagine him with his style , bothering the big units like Lennox Lewis and Klitchko too much now </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kidcalder
    wrote on last edited by
    #166

    <p>Mike Tyson v George Foreman would have been fun while it lasted</p>
    <p>Holyfield v Bowe are great heavyweight fights</p>
    <p>Tua had some great fights yes but some utter shite as well - motivation and ring smarts when needed (easily outskilled) were at times lacking.</p>
    <p>Def Tua just did not have the work ethic and dedication of Parker - if he did he prob would have got a version of the title</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mikedogzM Offline
    mikedogzM Offline
    mikedogz
    wrote on last edited by
    #167

    <p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href=''></a></p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #168

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MN5" data-cid="547173" data-time="1449806211"><p>
    Google images of Jack Johnson ( not the singer ) and Jim Jeffries ( not the comedian ) both of them have physiques seriously ahead of their time. Definitely a few weight sessions and steak meals in there along with awesome genetics.<br><br>
    As for the rounds, yes they did a ridiculous amount and some of those were fucken bare knuckled !?!?!<br><br>
    Again, ya can't compare eras but fuck those old fluffybunnys must have been tough.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    Yep, I remember when I first saw footage of Johnson and thought straightway that his physique wouldn't look out of place in modern boxing. No performance enhancing shit at that time either. He wasn't huge though. 90 odd kilos IIRC.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mimicM Offline
    mimicM Offline
    mimic
    wrote on last edited by
    #169

    <p>Anthony Joshua knocks outs Whyte to remain undefeated..</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Seems to be a couple of fighters that Parker will have to go through..</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kidcalder
    wrote on last edited by
    #170

    <p>AJ prob ahead of Parker at this stage and he is very marketable</p>
    <p>Parker v Unistov (who won other day) a good option then target an elimination fight.</p>
    <p>Parker is being noticed on the HW stage so keeping winning is paramount</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #171

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Bart The Muss" data-cid="547409" data-time="1449982092">
    <div>
    <p>AJ prob ahead of Parker at this stage and he is very marketable</p>
    <p>Parker v Unistov (who won other day) a good option then target an elimination fight.</p>
    <p>Parker is being noticed on the HW stage so keeping winning is paramount</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>In today's SST it says Parker is now ranked no.3 in the WBO rankings.  Joshua is ranked no.2. </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I doubt Duco will get some of the better heavyweights to fight Parker in NZ so they'll have to fight in the US.  The likes of Shannon Briggs have turned down fights with Parker.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kidcalder
    wrote on last edited by
    #172

    <p>Shannon Briggs is a joke - he fighting guys worse than Parkers and trying to talk his way to a payday.</p>
    <p>He managed it once against Vitaly and got nearly every bone in his face broken.</p>
    <p>Parker would batter him</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I have never of the american guy ranked have to find his name again and google his ass</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mimicM Offline
    mimicM Offline
    mimic
    wrote on last edited by
    #173

    <p>Sure Parker is ranked 3rd for WBO.. But hes not even ranked top 10 for the other belts.. </p>
    <p>Parker has a long way to go.. Haye looks to making a comeback as well.. </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Klitschko, Fury, Parker, Takam &#38; Joshua
Sports Talk
fighting
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.