SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders

[Anonymous]

@antipodean said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

This referral shit has got to go

What do you mean? That was clearly almost the wrong decision

[Nepia]

Odd that they now have multiple looks at captain's referral replays instead of just the one and done of the early rounds.

[hydro11]

@anonymous said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

@antipodean said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

This referral shit has got to go

What do you mean? That was clearly almost the wrong decision

Yip the system worked fine.

[Mattasaurus]

@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

Is Super Rugby Aus doing these referrals?

They have been doing for a few years when you listen to all the bleating when the tahs play 😁

[taniwharugby]

@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.

Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it

[gt12]

@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.

Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it

I would do exactly the same thing, nothing to lose

[Hooroo]

Ridiculous!!!!

Great performance from the Chiefs!!!!

[hydro11]

Crusaders are no better at game management than any other Super Rugby team in New Zealand. They beat teams by having better players. Their decision making is just as poor, IMO.

[gt12]

I dont think we deserved that, but I’ll take it!!

[Toddy]

Great win by the Chiefs. They look a better team without the AB captain.

[KiwiMurph]

Well done Chiefs.

Fun game.

Great crowd.

[Frank]

@canerbry said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

Accuracy seems a bit off for the Crusaders, Mo is missing the timing for some hard runners a bit. A small adjustment and they'll take this Chiefs team apart later in the game.

Nah

[hydro11]

@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.

Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it

Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.

[kev]

@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

@gt12 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

I bang on about this but that poor exit by the Chiefs really sums up the difference between these teams. Those 20 metres make a huge difference

Not really. Chiefs got back into the game through a poor exit by Reece.

Key moment in the game. That and Richies missed kick. Great game though.

[antipodean]

@toddy said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

Great win by the Chiefs. They look a better team without the AB captain.

That'sbait.gif

[Bones]

@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.

Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it

Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.

My only concern with it there, was the chiefs wouldn't have been able to use their referral for a hit and hope against the saders that may have happened before the breakdown (e.g. the borderline obstruction by the player in front of the ball carrier).

[Hooroo]

What a comp though. Crusaders still the class above but the rest of the pack are just about there

I think the Aussies are going to get a fucking hiding in the comp that starts after this finishes. What are the calling the comp?

[Bones]

Ahem.

Blues and Crusaders clearly the best two teams in the comp by a country mile.

[Mattasaurus]

@bones yeah those blues did real well last night.

[KiwiMurph]

Chiefs likely to make the final now.