• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

The debate about 12

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
124 Posts 31 Posters 2.1k Views
The debate about 12
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #23

    @Catogrande said in The debate about 12:

    So often with England (cricket and soccer too), so much emphasis is placed on what a guy can’t do rather than what he can.

    Great point. I recall someone criticising Lineker as, yes, he may score loads of goals but they are easy, simple goals and doesn't score any spectacular ones...

    The other issue is England seem to pick players with the same physical characteristics as other countries and hope they will develop. The AB's have a big Samoan 12 called Nonu? No problems we'll Tualigi. He's big & fast and Samoan, the skills have just got to develop, right?

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #24

    @Bones said in The debate about 12:

    @Victor-Meldrew said in The debate about 12:

    Jamie Joseph is an exception who's really good at this - but he can't nail down a midfield slot

    I'm not surprised. He would be considered a bit of a bruiser in the midfield though eh.

    Too old these days too

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    On the AB side of things, Eddies musings add weight to the selection of JG and ALB seemingly the wrong way around.
    If rush defences are the problem then it makes sense for your faster more elusive centre to play 13. You either skip 12 to outside channels or 12 looks to take a tackle and provide quick ball that the “three quarters “ can use.

    Victor MeldrewV P J 3 Replies Last reply
    4
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #26

    @Crucial

    Real good point which might help explain how the ABs have struggled in midfield positions since Conrad & Ma'a retired

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #27

    @Crucial said in The debate about 12:

    On the AB side of things, Eddies musings add weight to the selection of JG and ALB seemingly the wrong way around.
    If rush defences are the problem then it makes sense for your faster more elusive centre to play 13. You either skip 12 to outside channels or 12 looks to take a tackle and provide quick ball that the “three quarters “ can use.

    Felt they were trying to do that with Roane in Bled One.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    The other consideration is just how often is the backline 10,12,13. Maybe from lineouts or a Scrum without a blind. A lot of the time in phase play etc players are all over the place both sides of the field.

    The 13 probably plays a lot as second receiver during a game anyway. So perhaps the roles are more similar then once upon a time.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #29

    @chimoaus said in The debate about 12:

    The other consideration is just how often is the backline 10,12,13. Maybe from lineouts or a Scrum without a blind. A lot of the time in phase play etc players are all over the place both sides of the field.

    The 13 probably plays a lot as second receiver during a game anyway. So perhaps the roles are more similar then once upon a time.

    Yeah the backiline even from set pieces if often shuffled, to cover defensive weaknesses or try and trick the opposition. Positions outside of things like front row are becoming less and less 'formal' or fixed. Working in shifting pods, trying to generate mismatches etc.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #30

    My thinking is they are looking at JG as a guy who could provide that punch at 12 like Laumape, has a better passing game, has a kicking game and crucially, is smarter on defence than NL, also seems to be someone they use to try secure our ball at the breakdown alot too.

    That said, I like most, see him and ALB as being the wrong way round.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #31

    @taniwharugby said in The debate about 12:

    My thinking is they are looking at JG as a guy who could provide that punch at 12 like Laumape, has a better passing game, has a kicking game and crucially, is smarter on defence than NL, also seems to be someone they use to try secure our ball at the breakdown alot too.

    That said, I like most, see him and ALB as being the wrong way round.

    Funny you say that because I thought JG's passing game was poor in AKLD. A bunch of hospital passes, a pass to no one, and one or two good uns

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to canefan on last edited by taniwharugby
    #32

    @canefan as mentioned elsewhere, that pass to no one to me seemed it was to someone, with BB several paces behind, and CC another 2 or 3m further out, seemed too good of a pass (in that it didnt seem a poor pass, seemed a nice firm flat pass) to be that short of CC if he was the target or far too long if it was for the man it cut out.

    Or maybe JG or BB got the move wrong?

    Usually his passing is better, but as always, could do with improving, still only 25, so plenty of time try to get up to Nonu level passing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    In France, as far as I can remember, there is no notion of an inside centre coupled with an outside centre. The French teams, at club or national level, have always played with a right and left centres. They usually don't kick. I have in mind the notable exception of Frank Mesnel who was sometimes used as what could be considered as a 2nd Five.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to cgrant on last edited by
    #34

    @cgrant said in The debate about 12:

    In France, as far as I can remember, there is no notion of an inside centre coupled with an outside centre. The French teams, at club or national level, have always played with a right and left centres. They usually don't kick. I have in mind the notable exception of Frank Mesnel who was sometimes used as what could be considered as a 2nd Five.

    I know that was right traditionally, but I haven't noticed that in last few years' Heine Cup.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    DMX
    wrote on last edited by
    #35

    When Nonu was first moved to 12 for ABs in 2006 there was a lot of head scratching when Henry and co said they thought it was his best position. If I remember right he was chosen ahead of Mauger (maybe McAllister too?). I don't remember if he had already started playing there with the Canes?

    canefanC ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to DMX on last edited by
    #36

    @DMX said in The debate about 12:

    When Nonu was first moved to 12 for ABs in 2006 there was a lot of head scratching when Henry and co said they thought it was his best position. If I remember right he was chosen ahead of Mauger (maybe McAllister too?). I don't remember if he had already started playing there with the Canes?

    He went from a purely cart it up 12 and became an all round 12 who could run, distribute and kick (a bit). Lots of doubters

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #37

    @canefan said in The debate about 12:

    @DMX said in The debate about 12:

    When Nonu was first moved to 12 for ABs in 2006 there was a lot of head scratching when Henry and co said they thought it was his best position. If I remember right he was chosen ahead of Mauger (maybe McAllister too?). I don't remember if he had already started playing there with the Canes?

    He went from a purely cart it up 12 and became an all round 12 who could run, distribute and kick (a bit). Lots of doubters

    Always had a step.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    DMX
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    Think I mentioned elsewhere how much I enjoyed the '08 season, a big reason was his emergence as a 12.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to DMX on last edited by
    #39

    @DMX said in The debate about 12:

    When Nonu was first moved to 12 for ABs in 2006 there was a lot of head scratching when Henry and co said they thought it was his best position. If I remember right he was chosen ahead of Mauger (maybe McAllister too?). I don't remember if he had already started playing there with the Canes?

    He only played one test at 2nd 5 in 06. The others were at centre and off the bench stints at centre and on the wing. In 2006 there was a lot of rotation.

    Then in 07 he only had a couple of brief stints off the bench at centre given Mauger and Lucky were the preferred 2nd 5s and Snakey, Mils and Ice the preferred centres.

    Fast forward to after the RWC and Nonu and Snakey assume first choice midfield for the mid-season tests and then into the 3Ns. And as they say the rest is history.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to DMX on last edited by
    #40

    @DMX said in The debate about 12:

    Think I mentioned elsewhere how much I enjoyed the '08 season, a big reason was his emergence as a 12.

    Yeah, he had a really shit on field attitude and was a frustrating player to watch. He'd make mistakes and not try to atone (like spilling the ball and then just turning his back and walking off). Definitely became a lot more focused.

    rotatedR 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Nonu’s evolution was quite extraordinary seen from afar as at first he was looked on as just an effective battering ram, then the next time you see him he was beating guys with guile and pace. Fast forward another year and his passing game had become a strength. I wouldn’t have thought on first seeing him play that he would go on to be one of NZ’s best ever 12s. Kudos to the man.

    mofitzy_M MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    8
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #42

    @Catogrande said in The debate about 12:

    Nonu’s evolution was quite extraordinary seen from afar as at first he was looked on as just an effective battering ram, then the next time you see him he was beating guys with guile and pace. Fast forward another year and his passing game had become a strength. I wouldn’t have thought on first seeing him play that he would go on to be one of NZ’s best ever 12s. Kudos to the man.

    Even his kicking game was world class by the end.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5

The debate about 12
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.