• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Springboks V All Blacks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
842 Posts 75 Posters 56.4k Views
Springboks V All Blacks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #774

    For those that haven’t seen it.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #775

    @act-crusader massive lack of respect shown

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #776

    @act-crusader He probably didn't ever quite get around to it. 🙂

    Bleyendaal was the other guy in the squad that I had in mind.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #777

    @act-crusader said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    I don’t think Barrett is going to lose the starting 10 spot for the big tests. The question is whether they want him to play a full 80 at 10 (DMac on bench) or finish the game at fullback (Mo’unga on bench)

    When is the last time he actually played a full 80 at 10?

    Those pumping RM should be careful what they wish for. Same thing happened last year with Lima. That turned out well.

    As mentioned, the biggest issue is those farking kicks. Get them right or don't do them at all. Maybe there is a method to this madness. God knows those little pop passes caused all kinds of grief. Now they're shredding defences. But having said that BB is not getting anywhere like the amount of air needed on those kicks.

    Another thing is that I would also question whether the starting 10 and kicker should be taking on the line in the early stages of the game when defences are set. I'd like to see BB run the ball alot more, but he is a marked man these days.

    I'd be very surprised if RM becomes the incumbent any time soon but he's clearly a good bench option. The big question is then whether you go also include DMac on the bench.

    ACT CrusaderA Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by ACT Crusader
    #778

    @rancid-schnitzel last test in Welly he played 80 at 10. DMac went to fullback.

    Played 80 at 1st 5 for both Aussie tests this year also.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #779

    Not that I’m pumping, fluffing, defending, but Sopoaga and Mo’unga are very different players.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by Rancid Schnitzel
    #780

    @act-crusader said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel last test in Welly he played 80 at 10. DMac went to fullback.

    Played 80 at 1st 5 for both Aussie tests this year also.

    Are you sure about that? He certainly didn't play the full 80 at 10 against Aus in the 2nd test. Pretty sure he was replaced in the 1st test as well.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by ACT Crusader
    #781

    Rancid Schnitzel said:

    @act-crusader said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel last test in Welly he played 80 at 10. DMac went to fullback.

    Played 80 at 1st 5 for both Aussie tests this year also.

    Are you sure about that? He certainly didn't play the full 80 at 10 against Aus in the 2nd test. Pretty sure he was replaced in the 1st test as well.

    Other than France II he’s played 80 minutes in every test he’s played this year.

    In terms of being at 1st 5, those Aussies tests DMac came on for Jordie and whilst there was interchanging at 1st receiver, Barrett was mainly up in the line running the cutter

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #782

    Didnt we get the 'speed wobbles' v SA in 2014 and our play at times in 2014 vs numerous opposition wasnt the prettiest.

    This often got attributed to holding things back and playing slightly differently to what they really want to so as to not allow opposition ways to work out ways to combat some things they were trying?

    Hard bunch of fans to please though.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by Chris B.
    #783

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @act-crusader said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    I'd be very surprised if RM becomes the incumbent any time soon but he's clearly a good bench option. The big question is then whether you go also include DMac on the bench.

    Don't think there's much room or much need for them both. You'd be sacrificing specialist midfield cover and might end up with Rieko at second five!

    One thing about having Richie on the bench is that if Ben Smith goes down injured early - does that necessitate shifting Beauden to fullback? That might not be desirable if things are going swimmingly in a big game.

    If Richie is going to be the bench option, does he also need to show that he's a credible international fullback?

    gt12G KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #784

    @taniwharugby said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Didnt we get the 'speed wobbles' v SA in 2014 and our play at times in 2014 vs numerous opposition wasnt the prettiest.

    This often got attributed to holding things back and playing slightly differently to what they really want to so as to not allow opposition ways to work out ways to combat some things they were trying?

    Hard bunch of fans to please though.

    A whole host of people here were losing their shit during the crucial RWC group games against Namibia et al. Nothing new.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by Rancid Schnitzel
    #785

    @act-crusader said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Rancid Schnitzel said:

    @act-crusader said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel last test in Welly he played 80 at 10. DMac went to fullback.

    Played 80 at 1st 5 for both Aussie tests this year also.

    Are you sure about that? He certainly didn't play the full 80 at 10 against Aus in the 2nd test. Pretty sure he was replaced in the 1st test as well.

    Other than France II he’s played 80 minutes in every test he’s played this year.

    In terms of being at 1st 5, those Aussies tests DMac came on for Jordie and whilst there was interchanging at 1st receiver, Barrett was mainly up in the line running the cutter

    Thought he was replaced in Sydney, but I stand corrected. But he certainly wasn't playing ten at the end of that 2nd test. Just look where he was when he scored his final 2 tries (one of which was disallowed).

    Regardless, when a specialist 10 is on the bench, BB rarely if ever finishes the game at 10.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #786

    @taniwharugby said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @mn5 said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @sammyc said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @akan004 said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    I think a telling indicator from the MoTM thread is Sam Whitelock has zero votes. In the absence of BBBR we have really needed him to stand up, but he has not risen to the occasion. Sam is a very very good lock, but jesus he's had a workload this year, the bloke looks like he needs a couple of months off.

    Razor needs to start managing Sam's workload a bit better during Super Rugby. He plays him in virtually every game and usually for the entire 80 minutes, even when it's against weaker teams like the Sunwolves.

    A quick google search tells me that Sam Whitelock was rested against the Sunwolves this year (not even on the bench).

    Sometimes it's not always wise to trust the internet though.

    After All, I'm skeptical there's hot teens in my neighbourhood who are dying to meet me.

    that's your best post ever.

    More than likely.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #787

    @chris-b said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @act-crusader said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    I'd be very surprised if RM becomes the incumbent any time soon but he's clearly a good bench option. The big question is then whether you go also include DMac on the bench.

    Don't think there's much room or much need for them both. You'd be sacrificing specialist midfield cover and might end up with Rieko at second five!

    One thing about having Richie on the bench is that if Ben Smith goes down injured early - does that necessitate shifting Beauden to fullback? That might not be desirable if things are going swimmingly in a big game.

    If Richie is going to be the bench option, does he also need to show that he's a credible international fullback?

    I think using all three is a good option to test, which is why I'd move BFA to 14, put Dmac at 15, start Barrett, and have Richie coming off the bench. Whether it's a good use of resources or not is a question I'd like to see used in a game or two.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #788

    @chris-b said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    If DMac is going to be the bench option, does he also need to show that he's a credible international ten?

    I've re-worded your question for another way of looking at it

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #789

    I'm interested to see what they do in the Japan and Italy tests. Everyone expected Mo’unga to start in Nelson and also likely in Tokyo. I would have thought DMac was a chance to be the fullback vs Japan but that may have changed now with the group leaving early for England (could be JB that plays Japan now). It's likely one of DMac/RM won't be in Japan. I'd give each a start at 1st 5 over those 2 games for experience.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #790

    I really can't see why RM wouldn't be considered as fullback cover.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #791

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @westcoastie said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    I'd like to see more discussion about whether the issues lay more with Aaron Smith than Beaudy.
    I feel that when DC played, it was clear who was the on-field general tactics wise. Richie's team management is next level compared to Kieran Read.
    I think when we talk about AB leadership and driving the team, maybe we have too many chiefs at the moment. Aaron Smith did some dumb shit in that last test - I reckon if he got back to giving Beaudy the ball quicker and letting the 10 drive things we'd be better off.

    There is a certain amount of truth to this, A Smith was poor in the first 50 minutes of Saturday. He wasn't helped by some of the worst ball presentation i have seen from an AB side in recent years. But that doesn't excuse some of the decision making, and the inaccuracy of the kicking.

    But writing BB's issues off to the halfback is some serious whitewashing. A Smith wasn't at fault for the awful, awful kicking game; the stand and shovel passing game; or the distinct lack of run.

    Not all the poor kicking was down to BB though in this test, but A.Smtih wasn't without blame and there were plenty others guilty of rubbish kicking (definitely a collective effort) - South Africas kicks were far more contestable than ours, and we kicked sooo much away aimlessly.

    For a number of years, the forwards have been run by the 9, who then guns it to the 10 when he wants it.

    Happy to agree/concede that 2018 hasn't been a vintage year for BB (the Australian test aside). But maybe this is the issue, we've got a 9 trying to run things, a 10 trying to run things and probably Kieran Read trying to run things, with Ben Smith also providing input. So again Hansen putting on his leaders to drive things better, maybe all are just trying a bit too hard.

    Also, maybe its as simple as missing the work of the likes of Retallick and Squire (these two are probably our most key "outs"
    I don't think we're missing Dane Coles that much, Taylor was looking tired though and has had a big campaign thus far.
    Not sure we're missing any of the props deemed "first choice" either for that matter.

    I feel like Beaudy was at his absolute best in 2016, and I think his combination with Crotty was part of that. Its interesting that most first-fives other than Cruden have struggled with SBW outside of them...
    If Crotty is the key to unlocking Beaudy, and we all seem to think Goodhue is looking more and more likely the first choice 13 then theres a backline starting to form
    9 A.Smith
    10 BB
    11 Ioane
    12 Crotty
    13 Goodhue
    14 Naholo
    15 B.Smith

    Bench
    TJP
    Mo'unga
    SBW

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to westcoastie on last edited by
    #792

    @westcoastie that is a lot of words just to wind @mariner4life up.

    alt text

    westcoastieW 1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #793

    @act-crusader said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Not that I’m pumping, fluffing, defending, but Sopoaga and Mo’unga are very different players.

    Richie - a bit of Cruden and a bit of King Carlos?!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Springboks V All Blacks
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.