• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Hurricanes v Sunwolves

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
hurricanessunwolves
90 Posts 26 Posters 4.0k Views
Hurricanes v Sunwolves
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #78

    @bones said in Hurricanes v Sunwolves:

    What on earth has happened to Jules?

    Refound his mojo?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #79

    The Woollofs seem to present a more difficult opponent than we're perhaps giving them credit for.

    Score was flattering. As it was for the Saders. Perhaps a bit more perspective to the Blue's performance.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #80

    I can never understand score was flattering or one team lost but deserved to win. The Sunwolves had 90% territory after 30 minutes of the second half and manufactured one streaky (but well taken) try. The Hurricanes then had ten minutes of ball and scored three times. That isn't flattering. That is one team having a backline which can take chances when they get good ball and the other team not having that. The Sunwolves were plucky and I think put in much better performances on this tour than we expected. However, if they felt they deserved a closer score line, they should have defended better in the last ten minutes or done a bit more with all of their ball and territory.

    canefanC Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #81

    @hydro11 said in Hurricanes v Sunwolves:

    I can never understand score was flattering or one team lost but deserved to win. The Sunwolves had 90% territory after 30 minutes of the second half and manufactured one streaky (but well taken) try. The Hurricanes then had ten minutes of ball and scored three times. That isn't flattering. That is one team having a backline which can take chances when they get good ball and the other team not having that. The Sunwolves were plucky and I think put in much better performances on this tour than we expected. However, if they felt they deserved a closer score line, they should have defended better in the last ten minutes or done a bit more with all of their ball and territory.

    A guy mentioned to me that the Melbourne Storm lost out on the possession stakes to the Warriors. Does that mean the game deserved to he closer? I think not. You don't need to dominate possession when every time you get the ball you score

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #82

    @hydro11 I'm the opposite - I think a lot of sport is subjective and the team that has generally played better often loses relatively close contests - as much through bad luck as anything.

    But, a test for you:

    One team is ahead by four points. 80 minutes is up on the clock - in the last play of the game, the opposition wing dives into the corner - he's very close to the touchline - may be in or out and the live angle you've seen is totally inconclusive.

    The match is over, you've watched the whole thing and, before they go upstairs to review the excellent footage that will be available from another angle - can you form an opinion on who deserved to win?

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #83

    I like rugby in that generally speaking the better team wins, whether that's based on awesome D or great attacking play. Can't always say the same for other sports, especially soccer where a tin arse goal or two can win a match against the odds.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #84

    @chris-b said in Hurricanes v Sunwolves:

    @hydro11 I'm the opposite - I think a lot of sport is subjective and the team that has generally played better often loses relatively close contests - as much through bad luck as anything.

    But, a test for you:

    One team is ahead by four points. 80 minutes is up on the clock - in the last play of the game, the opposition wing dives into the corner - he's very close to the touchline - may be in or out and the live angle you've seen is totally inconclusive.

    The match is over, you've watched the whole thing and, before they go upstairs to review the excellent footage that will be available from another angle - can you form an opinion on who deserved to win?

    @chris-b said in Hurricanes v Sunwolves:

    @hydro11 I'm the opposite - I think a lot of sport is subjective and the team that has generally played better often loses relatively close contests - as much through bad luck as anything.

    But, a test for you:

    One team is ahead by four points. 80 minutes is up on the clock - in the last play of the game, the opposition wing dives into the corner - he's very close to the touchline - may be in or out and the live angle you've seen is totally inconclusive.

    The match is over, you've watched the whole thing and, before they go upstairs to review the excellent footage that will be available from another angle - can you form an opinion on who deserved to win?

    No, I honestly don't think you can. The exception is refereeing decisions because you can't control that. Maybe bounce of the ball is one thing you could argue about but even then i would probably say one team deserved it.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooper
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #85

    @kirwan said in Hurricanes v Sunwolves:

    @canefan said in Hurricanes v Sunwolves:

    @kirwan said in Hurricanes v Sunwolves:

    @unite said in Hurricanes v Sunwolves:

    Missed the game, how did NMS go when he came on?

    Pulled off his step on his first run, took some heavy contact and don’t break. Great cheer from the crowd when he came on.

    Didn’t do a lot, but a start.

    Savea had a very good game.

    Missed the game, which Savea had a good game? Surely not the bus?

    Yep, they have swapped. Ardie was terrible, and Julian had a high work rate, looked trim and was bowling people over. Not quite his old pace yet, but he looked good to me.

    We have to remember it was the Sunwolves...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooper
    wrote on last edited by
    #86

    I like Riccitelli;s endeavour his work ethic and his commitment, but jeebus he has improve his throwing....

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by Chris B.
    #87

    @hydro11 Well, the correct answer to the hypothetical is that the Crusaders deserved to win. 🙂

    But, in the event that they're not playing - you've given the ultra-objective answer to the question. I reckon it's much more subjective...and that makes for much more interesting post-game discussions! 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    wrote on last edited by
    #88

    Julian Savea might be finding his mojo. He may be playing well.

    But players don't suddenly "find" their old pace, like it slipped down the back of the sofa and he didn't look hard enough.

    If he is to "find" some pace it will be in the off-season.

    And I have a lovely bridge that you might like to buy, if you fall for that. Only one owner, a lovely Nigerian Prince.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    Didn't watch this, just watching the package in Rugby Nation. After J Barret's try I think jeezus christ, how did that try not get scrubbed out for obstruction. Then at the end there's s little piece on Aso's ruled out tries and TJ musing the TMO got too involved in this game.

    Did he let Jordies go out of pity? Or get sick of having to stick his oar in all the time ....

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by
    #90

    @chester-draws said in Hurricanes v Sunwolves:

    Julian Savea might be finding his mojo. He may be playing well.

    But players don't suddenly "find" their old pace, like it slipped down the back of the sofa and he didn't look hard enough.

    If he is to "find" some pace it will be in the off-season.

    And I have a lovely bridge that you might like to buy, if you fall for that. Only one owner, a lovely Nigerian Prince.

    Losing the weight might be a start, he’s looking trim. I agree with you, have an old memory of Savea or was it the Rok being sent to sevens to sharpen up and came back quicker.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Hurricanes v Sunwolves
Rugby Matches
hurricanessunwolves
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.