Crusaders v Chiefs (SF)
-
@antipodean said in Crusaders v Chiefs (SF):
I see Hika Elliot's fall from grace continues...
Que? "Not considered". Is there a reason?
-
@booboo said in Crusaders v Chiefs (SF):
@antipodean said in Crusaders v Chiefs (SF):
I see Hika Elliot's fall from grace continues...
Que? "Not considered". Is there a reason?
Everyone else on that list is known to be injured
-
@Crucial said in Crusaders v Chiefs (SF):
@booboo said in Crusaders v Chiefs (SF):
@antipodean said in Crusaders v Chiefs (SF):
I see Hika Elliot's fall from grace continues...
Que? "Not considered". Is there a reason?
Everyone else on that list is known to be injured
I thought Johnny Fa'auli was running around on a paddock days ago?
-
The team lists make an interesting contrast.
The Crusaders are stacked with Test players in the forwards but are nowhere near that quality in the backs while the Chiefs have international players almost right through but the experience at that level is lower.
Crusaders - 10 (+1 reserve) Internationals/474 (+26) Tests played
Chiefs - (13 (+2) Internationals/ 270 (+25) Tests played -
RENNIE FIRES UP!!!!
Ummm well in saying he fires up, all he actually does is acknowledge and agree with question.
I'm just a dumbass that clciked on the article wondering what he was 'firing up' about
-
You know Rennie is serious when he is "bloody angry".
-
-
@KiwiMurph just came to note the same...
-
I thought the Adidas deal was boots an djersies through Super rugby?
-
Crusaders defence superb. Lot of errors from Dmac. Crusaders by 15 plus
-
close to a PT for mine
