Crusaders v Chiefs (SF)
-
@Crash said in Crusaders v Chiefs (SF):
No Alaimalo? Guess he didn't recover fro whatever injury (ankle?) he picked up. Like the look of this kid though, goes looking for work and is hungry for the ball.
Rennie has answered that in saying they have gone for experience in TNW. Stevenson is a proven bencher.
-
@Tim said in Crusaders v Chiefs (SF):
How many penalties will Kane Hames give away?
Between him and Sam Cane, they're good for about 6 or 7. But knowing Jacko, he'll probably swallow his whistle... 😎
-
@antipodean said in Crusaders v Chiefs (SF):
I see Hika Elliot's fall from grace continues...
Que? "Not considered". Is there a reason?
-
@booboo said in Crusaders v Chiefs (SF):
@antipodean said in Crusaders v Chiefs (SF):
I see Hika Elliot's fall from grace continues...
Que? "Not considered". Is there a reason?
Everyone else on that list is known to be injured
-
@Crucial said in Crusaders v Chiefs (SF):
@booboo said in Crusaders v Chiefs (SF):
@antipodean said in Crusaders v Chiefs (SF):
I see Hika Elliot's fall from grace continues...
Que? "Not considered". Is there a reason?
Everyone else on that list is known to be injured
I thought Johnny Fa'auli was running around on a paddock days ago?
-
The team lists make an interesting contrast.
The Crusaders are stacked with Test players in the forwards but are nowhere near that quality in the backs while the Chiefs have international players almost right through but the experience at that level is lower.
Crusaders - 10 (+1 reserve) Internationals/474 (+26) Tests played
Chiefs - (13 (+2) Internationals/ 270 (+25) Tests played -
RENNIE FIRES UP!!!!
Ummm well in saying he fires up, all he actually does is acknowledge and agree with question.
I'm just a dumbass that clciked on the article wondering what he was 'firing up' about
-
You know Rennie is serious when he is "bloody angry".
-
-
@KiwiMurph just came to note the same...
-
I thought the Adidas deal was boots an djersies through Super rugby?
