All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.
-
-
@reprobate said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:
savea does defend well, but naholo isn't a mug. breakdown work, workrate, speed (or acceleration really), elusiveness and support lines are all better in my opinion.
Yep, I agree with all of that, Naholo's support lines are amazingly good, I just don't agree thats its zero sum, for Naholo to be really good, we don't need Savea to be a shadow of his former self
-
@Bones said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:
@dingo said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:
Hopefully its the good J Savea this week, not the disinterested one. He can't have that many chances left.
Again with this? I don't know what the guy needs to do anymore. He's topping stats in heaps of areas, doing great work, I'd say he's meeting targets and then some. He's not there on a chance, he's there on performance.
Hear bloody hear.
Thing is he set the bar so high a couple of years ago when he doesn't score from 40m out and only beats one player he's "bloody useless/disinterested".
-
Awesome for us All Black fans that we have sonething to whinge about though
-
I feel like Savea is taking one for Todd, we were going to be bitching about something & I can almost picture Todd reading at home going
"no way? so no one on the Fern has compared me to Mark Carter?"
"nope, they are all shitting on Savea! high five! The younger ones are chanelling Rokocoko & the older ones have just thought about that 93 tour where fat Inga couldn't find the try line if there was a bucket of KFC on wheels leading him there"While Cruden is just going "no ones goives a shit about me anymore, not even the Cheifs guys"
-
I wish tuipolotou would get more love. Squire was excellent last match but I'd still like to see Patrick off the bench for this one. Also naholo again.
But these are minor quibbles.
-
Well count me in the minority.
I'm happy to see Julian there. When that guy finds his mojo he is the best we have had since Lomu at beating off defenders to score tries that shouldn't be scored. It must be demoralising for defences knowing they can put 3-4 players on him and he still gets through.
Admittedly, he hasn't shown much of that this year but there is no 'age' reason why he can't re-establish himself, just a mental thing. He still has the ability to be a weapon.
I don't exactly see Naholo scorching up the tracks either.
-
This post is deleted!
-
I made a post about Julian going through a similar phase to Joe, but deleted it , because re thought it , and im not convinced he is yet.
-
Thought this was pretty good:
Wallabies need to go up the guts to stand a chance against All Blacks
The rare meaningful incursions opposition teams have made against the All Blacks share a common denominator: they have been the result of good, direct running in the centre of the field.
Paul Cully
Wallabies need to go up the guts to stand a chance against All Blacks
The rare meaningful incursions opposition teams have made against the All Blacks share a common denominator: they have been the result of good, direct running in the centre of the field.
Liam Williams in the Wales series, Will Genia in Wellington, the combination of Johan Goosen and Pieter-Steph du Toit in Christchurch, and the inside balls the Pumas used in Hamilton: that's where the holes have been found.
Typically, that's where their tight forwards defend. In fact, if you were to point a finger at the players who were stepped, or missed the tackle, in the examples above, the list would be Brodie Retallick, Joe Moody, Dane Coles and Coles again.
Is there a weakness there? Not fundamentally, of course, otherwise there wouldn't be such a gap between the All Blacks and the rest of the competition. It's more needles and haystacks territory but when the bookies have you at $10 in a two-horse race you have to take cheer in the smallest of openings.
There are two elements at play here. First, the back three have got to be prepared to carry into the big men and look for these little mismatches off counterattack ball. Those spotted trying to outflank the All Blacks instead of targeting the low numbers should be given one chance but if they repeat the error they should be immediately hooked. It is not where the opportunities are.
Second, there is a big onus on the tight five to carry strongly and clean out with purpose when the Wallabies are trying to build pressure.
They've got to punch around the fringes and punch again and then bring in some deception with Quade Cooper.
It is all dependent on the tight five though. I have not seen enough of Stephen Moore as a physical force this year. As captain he is the barometer, but the most common adjective associated with him in 2016 has been solid. His graciousness in defeat and position as captain has perhaps spared him from more scrutiny, but no one should be immune. He has to go up a level in Auckland.
The All Blacks aren't unaware that teams might try and hit with direct play. For all that is said about their supposed arrogance, they select teams with a huge amount of respect for the physical nature of Test rugby. That's why Matt Todd is in the team ahead of Ardie Savea.
A New Zealand colleague of mine, Ben Strang, did a fascinating piece on the New Zealand No 7s in July. It showed that the injured Sam Cane and Todd have more in common than either do with Savea.
The key stat in his analysis was the dominant tackle percentage. In short, Cane was by far the most dominant tackler of the trio, and Todd was some way ahead of Savea. It reflected with how they played the game at Super Rugby level, with Savea given more licence to try and win a turnover while the physically larger Cane and Todd would wait back and try to dominate the contact with ball carrier.
I say this unequivocally - Todd's selection at No. 7 is a sign of respect for the Wallabies, a nod to how they think the Wallabies will try to challenge them with aggression and size. If they were anticipating a game of basketball Savea would have been the man.
A Wallabies loss is still the most likely outcome: a loss by 30 points-plus is apparently tempting the casual punters. But a Wallabies performance to be proud of is still in Australian hands, and the way to do that is through the middle. -
Thanks for explaining yourself. The reasons behind the deleted post were really bugging me. Now I can sleep easier 😉
-
A GAGR poster posted this just before noon NZT:
WALLABIES TEAM
- Scott Sio (24 Tests)
- Stephen Moore (c) (111 Tests)
- Sekope Kepu (72 Tests)
- Rory Arnold (5 Tests)
- Adam Coleman (6 Tests)
- Dean Mumm (52 Tests)
- Michael Hooper (60 Tests)
- Lopeti Timani (2 Tests)
- Nick Phipps (47 Tests)
- Bernard Foley (36 Tests)
- Henry Speight (5 Tests)
- Reece Hodge (5 Tests)
- Samu Kerevi (7 Tests)
- Dane Haylett-Petty (9 Tests)
- Israel Folau (47 Tests)
RESERVES
- James Hanson (11 Tests)
- Tom Robertson (3 Tests)
- Allan Alaalatoa (4 Tests)
- Rob Simmons (65 Tests)
- David Pocock (60 Tests)
- Nick Frisby (2 Tests)
- Quade Cooper (63 Tests)
- Sefa Naivalu (1 Test)
-
@Tregaskis can't be right, there is only 23 names
-
@Tregaskis That line-up is correct.
The official media release can be found here:
-
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:
@Tregaskis can't be right, there is only 23 names
SURPRISE MUTHAFUCKA!!!
-
Not a bad lineup, i think they've got the calls pretty much right. Their best tight 5, a balanced back row, probably their best midfield, and a decent set of outsides. Cooper off the bench for spark. Not sure about Pocock and Simmons as "impact" but i guess they have a plan
-
@NTA said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:
@Tregaskis can't be right, there is only 23 names
SURPRISE MUTHAFUCKA!!!
-
Wallabies rejig backline for third Bledisloe
