• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

NZ First Five Crisis

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
139 Posts 51 Posters 4.2k Views
NZ First Five Crisis
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    brodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #52

    Jordies line kicking is sloppy at times.

    James Lowe seems to nail it every time.

    Guys like Stevenson and Sullivan have better exit kicks generally.

    Roigards exits were a weapon but I'm not sure the box kick as is easy now days with that new rule.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #53

    I don't know why Jordie takes the line kicks. DMac doesn't have any trouble with them for the Chiefs so why doesn't he do it? Do they have comps at training and Jordie kicks longer, then goes and fires pop guns in the actual games.

    @brodean Lowe's long punt was a thing of beauty. Could attack too. Wonder if he would have met the current lot's both sides of the ball requirements?

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Nepia on last edited by voodoo
    #54

    @Nepia said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    I don't know why Jordie takes the line kicks. DMac doesn't have any trouble with them for the Chiefs so why doesn't he do it? Do they have comps at training and Jordie kicks longer, then goes and fires pop guns in the actual games.

    @brodean Lowe's long punt was a thing of beauty. Could attack too. Wonder if he would have met the current lot's both sides of the ball requirements?

    Jordie takes line kicks and DMac takes penalty shots from 45m +

    Get with the program dude

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #55

    @canefan Some time between the 2015 World Cup and the 2017 Lions series, Steve Hansen and Steve Tew decided our DNA was to be the Great Entertainers and we have had an unbalanced game plan and set of selection criteria even since.

    If Grant Fox were an emerging NZ First Five today, he'd end up playing international Rugby in Irish Green.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #56

    @sparky said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    If Grant Fox were an emerging NZ First Five today, he'd end up playing international Rugby in Irish Green.

    was going to point to SexBomb as an example of a physically limited but very effective Test 10.

    R MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #57

    @nzzp said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @sparky said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    If Grant Fox were an emerging NZ First Five today, he'd end up playing international Rugby in Irish Green.

    was going to point to SexBomb as an example of a physically limited but very effective Test 10.

    It's a little unfair to not point out that he was mentally limited too.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to reprobate on last edited by
    #58

    @reprobate said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @nzzp said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @sparky said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    If Grant Fox were an emerging NZ First Five today, he'd end up playing international Rugby in Irish Green.

    was going to point to SexBomb as an example of a physically limited but very effective Test 10.

    It's a little unfair to not point out that he was mentally limited too.

    he was a fucking rugby genius at times. Fair play to him, he implemented the gameplan that took them to number 1 in the world.

    Still filth though, dropping the elbow into Beaudy in Dublin. Never forget!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #59

    @nzzp said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @sparky said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    If Grant Fox were an emerging NZ First Five today, he'd end up playing international Rugby in Irish Green.

    was going to point to SexBomb as an example of a physically limited but very effective Test 10.

    How so ? Big, strong, pretty quick and abrasive ?

    Certainly more physical than most 10s.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #60

    @MN5 said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @nzzp said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @sparky said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    If Grant Fox were an emerging NZ First Five today, he'd end up playing international Rugby in Irish Green.

    was going to point to SexBomb as an example of a physically limited but very effective Test 10.

    How so ? Big, strong, pretty quick and abrasive ?

    Certainly more physical than most 10s.

    You'd put him behind Carter, Cruden, Mo'unga, DMac in terms of physical gifts though - I don't think he was quick - but really smart rugby brain and played the quarterback role brilliantly.

    HOnest question: is my recollection that wrong? I did not think he had much going for him physically

    MN5M R 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #61

    Seems most people are happier with DMac than I am, and are also keen to see Plummer to get a crack. I still maintain that neither of them are close to that superstar level though, so my question remains who is the next star? Have they debuted at First Class level yet?

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to nzzp on last edited by MN5
    #62

    @nzzp said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @MN5 said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @nzzp said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @sparky said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    If Grant Fox were an emerging NZ First Five today, he'd end up playing international Rugby in Irish Green.

    was going to point to SexBomb as an example of a physically limited but very effective Test 10.

    How so ? Big, strong, pretty quick and abrasive ?

    Certainly more physical than most 10s.

    You'd put him behind Carter, Cruden, Mo'unga, DMac in terms of physical gifts though - I don't think he was quick - but really smart rugby brain and played the quarterback role brilliantly.

    HOnest question: is my recollection that wrong? I did not think he had much going for him physically

    I said pretty quick 😉

    Yes, those guys listed would all be quicker I’d imagine….

    But you mentioned physical so I instantly defaulted to the Fox/Merhts/O’Gara type 10 in my head.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #63

    @frugby said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    neither of them are close to that superstar level though

    hah! Just set the bar at GOAT level please!

    They are not close to that; DMac probably has the potential with his speed and long passing game ... but they can do a job for the ABs.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #64

    @nzzp said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @frugby said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    neither of them are close to that superstar level though

    hah! Just set the bar at GOAT level please!

    They are not close to that; DMac probably has the potential with his speed and long passing game ... but they can do a job for the ABs.

    Maybe it is reactionary, but that loss in Cape Town felt big for McKenzie's ABs career. I'd expect him to hold onto the jersey for now, so he has a chance to work his way back, but he failed to take that game by the scruff of the neck, and I really just see Mo'unga coming back and taking the jersey.

    I'm also unsure how well McKenzie will age as a player - quite heavily reliant on pace?

    What I really mean, is who is our next World Class 10, the next ABs 10 who is in the best in the world category? Maybe I am harsh, but I think at best McKenzie is a Top 5 in the world. I have Pollard, Sacha, Russell and Smith (at the very least) ahead of him.

    M R A 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mr Fish
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #65

    @frugby said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @nzzp said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @frugby said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    neither of them are close to that superstar level though

    hah! Just set the bar at GOAT level please!

    They are not close to that; DMac probably has the potential with his speed and long passing game ... but they can do a job for the ABs.

    Maybe it is reactionary, but that loss in Cape Town felt big for McKenzie's ABs career. I'd expect him to hold onto the jersey for now, so he has a chance to work his way back, but he failed to take that game by the scruff of the neck, and I really just see Mo'unga coming back and taking the jersey.

    I'm also unsure how well McKenzie will age as a player - quite heavily reliant on pace?

    What I really mean, is who is our next World Class 10, the next ABs 10 who is in the best in the world category? Maybe I am harsh, but I think at best McKenzie is a Top 5 in the world. I have Pollard, Sacha, Russell and Smith (at the very least) ahead of him.

    Smith??

    Pollard is overrated as a 10 - does the basics very well but isn't a great playmaker by any stretch.

    Aside from the missed kicks at goal, McKenzie was fine in that second match. He didn't look any worse than Mo'unga has previously looked against the Springboks.

    Though Mo'unga was not on the same level as a 10 as Cruden, Carter etc (and, frankly, neither was Barrett), so that doesn't really counter your overall point.

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #66

    @frugby said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @nzzp said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @frugby said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    neither of them are close to that superstar level though

    hah! Just set the bar at GOAT level please!

    They are not close to that; DMac probably has the potential with his speed and long passing game ... but they can do a job for the ABs.

    Maybe it is reactionary, but that loss in Cape Town felt big for McKenzie's ABs career. I'd expect him to hold onto the jersey for now, so he has a chance to work his way back, but he failed to take that game by the scruff of the neck, and I really just see Mo'unga coming back and taking the jersey.

    I'm also unsure how well McKenzie will age as a player - quite heavily reliant on pace?

    What I really mean, is who is our next World Class 10, the next ABs 10 who is in the best in the world category? Maybe I am harsh, but I think at best McKenzie is a Top 5 in the world. I have Pollard, Sacha, Russell and Smith (at the very least) ahead of him.

    When has Mo'unga ever taken a test against a big opponent by the scruff of the neck?
    Also he's reliant on pace, McKenzie can actually pass as well as run.

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #67

    @nzzp said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @MN5 said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @nzzp said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @sparky said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    If Grant Fox were an emerging NZ First Five today, he'd end up playing international Rugby in Irish Green.

    was going to point to SexBomb as an example of a physically limited but very effective Test 10.

    How so ? Big, strong, pretty quick and abrasive ?

    Certainly more physical than most 10s.

    You'd put him behind Carter, Cruden, Mo'unga, DMac in terms of physical gifts though - I don't think he was quick - but really smart rugby brain and played the quarterback role brilliantly.

    HOnest question: is my recollection that wrong? I did not think he had much going for him physically

    No, you're 100% right. He was really quite slow, medium-sized, and a pussy.
    My mentally limited comment was more a reference to choking than rugby brain.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Mr Fish on last edited by sparky
    #68

    @Mr-Fish said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @frugby said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @nzzp said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @frugby said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    neither of them are close to that superstar level though

    hah! Just set the bar at GOAT level please!

    They are not close to that; DMac probably has the potential with his speed and long passing game ... but they can do a job for the ABs.

    Maybe it is reactionary, but that loss in Cape Town felt big for McKenzie's ABs career. I'd expect him to hold onto the jersey for now, so he has a chance to work his way back, but he failed to take that game by the scruff of the neck, and I really just see Mo'unga coming back and taking the jersey.

    I'm also unsure how well McKenzie will age as a player - quite heavily reliant on pace?

    What I really mean, is who is our next World Class 10, the next ABs 10 who is in the best in the world category? Maybe I am harsh, but I think at best McKenzie is a Top 5 in the world. I have Pollard, Sacha, Russell and Smith (at the very least) ahead of him.

    Smith??

    Pollard is overrated as a 10 - does the basics very well

    Given Pollard has won back-to-back World Cups I would say he is underrated and doing the basics very well is what being an international Number 10 is all about.

    nzzpN M N 3 Replies Last reply
    6
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #69

    @sparky said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @Mr-Fish said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @frugby said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @nzzp said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @frugby said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    neither of them are close to that superstar level though

    hah! Just set the bar at GOAT level please!

    They are not close to that; DMac probably has the potential with his speed and long passing game ... but they can do a job for the ABs.

    Maybe it is reactionary, but that loss in Cape Town felt big for McKenzie's ABs career. I'd expect him to hold onto the jersey for now, so he has a chance to work his way back, but he failed to take that game by the scruff of the neck, and I really just see Mo'unga coming back and taking the jersey.

    I'm also unsure how well McKenzie will age as a player - quite heavily reliant on pace?

    What I really mean, is who is our next World Class 10, the next ABs 10 who is in the best in the world category? Maybe I am harsh, but I think at best McKenzie is a Top 5 in the world. I have Pollard, Sacha, Russell and Smith (at the very least) ahead of him.

    Smith??

    Pollard is overrated as a 10 - does the basics very well

    Given Pollard has won back-to-back World Cups I would say he is underrated and doing the basics very well is what being an international Number 10 is all about.

    you need a low error rate. Making consistently good decisions - SexBomb as well. Wouldn't mind seeing how Plummer's game goes there too - not pretending he's a world beater, but the Blues style seems to map pretty well to Tests

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by sparky
    #70

    It beggars belief to me that the All Blacks' exit work has been consistently appalling since 2016. It's as though successive coaches don't see this basic, fundamental part of the game as terribly important.

    Game after game after game poor exit work has put their sides under needless pressure.

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mr Fish
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #71

    @sparky said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @Mr-Fish said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @frugby said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @nzzp said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @frugby said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    neither of them are close to that superstar level though

    hah! Just set the bar at GOAT level please!

    They are not close to that; DMac probably has the potential with his speed and long passing game ... but they can do a job for the ABs.

    Maybe it is reactionary, but that loss in Cape Town felt big for McKenzie's ABs career. I'd expect him to hold onto the jersey for now, so he has a chance to work his way back, but he failed to take that game by the scruff of the neck, and I really just see Mo'unga coming back and taking the jersey.

    I'm also unsure how well McKenzie will age as a player - quite heavily reliant on pace?

    What I really mean, is who is our next World Class 10, the next ABs 10 who is in the best in the world category? Maybe I am harsh, but I think at best McKenzie is a Top 5 in the world. I have Pollard, Sacha, Russell and Smith (at the very least) ahead of him.

    Smith??

    Pollard is overrated as a 10 - does the basics very well

    Given Pollard has won back-to-back World Cups I would say he is underrated and doing the basics very well is what being an international Number 10 is all about.

    Does that mean that every Springbok who's won back-to-back WCs is underrated...?

    I'm not suggesting the basics aren't important, but he's very much a cog in the Springboks machine.

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0

NZ First Five Crisis
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.