• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks v Argentina II

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksargentina
1.4k Posts 84 Posters 32.6k Views
All Blacks v Argentina II
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #615

    @MN5 said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @Bones said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @MN5 said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @Bones said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @pakman said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    Lord has the physical dimensions and sure he’s still a young pup but I think they’ll persist with him at least whilst he’s fit and there are injuries to two frontline locks.

    The key physical dimension he doesn't have is a weight of 125 kegs.

    Whenever he's actually been able to string games together I've been impressed though, he definitely plays above his apparent weight. Whitelock seemed a bit of a lightweight to start with too.

    Sam was very slight to start out and continued to put on weight in those early AB days. Retallick was the same.

    Lord is only 23 so he has time to pack on more. But I don’t think we need him at 125. If he’s up around 115-118 range would be more than adequate

    Fairly sure Lord is benching 140kg in one of those cheesy vids that does the rounds on social media. That’s pretty handy.

    Fuck yeah, if Williams falls on him while he's lying on the bench he might be able to push him off.

    Certainly better to push him off than pull him off

    Agree to disagree

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #616

    @Bones said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @MN5 said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @Bones said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @MN5 said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @Bones said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @pakman said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    Lord has the physical dimensions and sure he’s still a young pup but I think they’ll persist with him at least whilst he’s fit and there are injuries to two frontline locks.

    The key physical dimension he doesn't have is a weight of 125 kegs.

    Whenever he's actually been able to string games together I've been impressed though, he definitely plays above his apparent weight. Whitelock seemed a bit of a lightweight to start with too.

    Sam was very slight to start out and continued to put on weight in those early AB days. Retallick was the same.

    Lord is only 23 so he has time to pack on more. But I don’t think we need him at 125. If he’s up around 115-118 range would be more than adequate

    Fairly sure Lord is benching 140kg in one of those cheesy vids that does the rounds on social media. That’s pretty handy.

    Fuck yeah, if Williams falls on him while he's lying on the bench he might be able to push him off.

    Certainly better to push him off than pull him off

    Agree to disagree

    It’s about 3am over where you are. I shudder to think what you’ve been dreaming of

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #617

    @MN5 your ability to tell the time is matched by your concern for my location.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Online
    F Online
    frugby
    replied to Stag on last edited by
    #618

    @Stag said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @frugby 5 out of the 23 are from the Crusaders, 3 from Canterbury. How could anyone come up with team Canterbury from that???

    Mostly in relation to the selection of Blackadder... I did also say this when I thought de Groot had been dropped for Williams, but obviously turned out he was injured.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #619
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Mattasaurus on last edited by Bovidae
    #620

    I've just scrolled through 619 posts and the match hasn't even started yet. I've no idea when I'll get around to reading the test 1 thread.

    @Mattasaurus said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    Wouldn't have minded seeing ALB at 12 and Reiko at 13....

    Me too. I was annoyed that JB wasn't subbed last test. I get the feeling that sometimes coaches don't want to be shown that their original selections might not be the best option so avoid making that choice.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #621

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @Bones said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @pakman said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    Lord has the physical dimensions and sure he’s still a young pup but I think they’ll persist with him at least whilst he’s fit and there are injuries to two frontline locks.

    The key physical dimension he doesn't have is a weight of 125 kegs.

    Whenever he's actually been able to string games together I've been impressed though, he definitely plays above his apparent weight. Whitelock seemed a bit of a lightweight to start with too.

    Sam was very slight to start out and continued to put on weight in those early AB days. Retallick was the same.

    Lord is only 23 so he has time to pack on more. But I don’t think we need him at 125. If he’s up around 115-118 range would be more than adequate

    I think Lord is 6’ 9” so, while 125 was a provocation I think 120 ought to be the target.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #622

    @antipodean said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @Jet said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    The backrow have all been 7's and the backline 10-15 are all historically outside backs. 😂

    Where have the specialists gone?

    Razor has said he wants people who can play multiple positions. I'm guessing he's of the belief that success comes from an ability to cover injuries.

    Perhaps he should consider that success comes from having the best players in their best positions...?

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jet
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #623

    @canefan said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @antipodean said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @Jet said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    The backrow have all been 7's and the backline 10-15 are all historically outside backs. 😂

    Where have the specialists gone?

    Razor has said he wants people who can play multiple positions. I'm guessing he's of the belief that success comes from an ability to cover injuries.

    Perhaps he should consider that success comes from having the best players in their best positions...?

    As I alluded to in my post first test rant, I think the team can finally "move on" when Beaudy and Ardie are gone.

    They are akin to latter career Cristiano Ronaldo.

    Former worldies, who cause you headaches in team dynamic and team selection with their inclusion. Thats harsh on Savea granted but I think it definitely applies to Barrett.

    Their deficiencies used to be masked by their propensity to pull highlight reel rabbits out of the hat. Cheat code players.

    In Barretts case the candle has dimmed, and in Savea's, he always upset the balance of the backrow size wise and has a penchant of trying to do everything on his own.

    The forwards and backs revolve around their selection, line out options, play making duties etc.

    Read, Carter, Ben Smith
    Savea, McKenzie, Barrett

    One of those trio's embodies clarity of role and specialisation.

    The other trio is a bunch of stray Jack Russells frolicking in a rubbish dump.

    D nostrildamusN 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • D Online
    D Online
    DaGrubster
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #624

    @mariner4life

    Essentially, we are seeing that Joe Schmidt is a better international coach than Razor is after 4 games in Charge.

    canefanC antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • D Online
    D Online
    DaGrubster
    replied to Jet on last edited by
    #625

    @Jet

    Move on from guy who was voted world player of the year 4 test matches ago?

    Move on from the player who saved our skin 2 tests ago?

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jet
    replied to DaGrubster on last edited by
    #626

    @DaGrubster said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @Jet

    Move on from guy who was voted world player of the year 4 test matches ago?

    Move on from the player who saved our skin 2 tests ago.

    Not necessarily. But I think he should have always been a 7.
    That’s why in my post I said I was being harsh on him.

    He can be both our best player and the team could be more balanced or functional without him at the same time.

    I think both things can be true in parallel.

    1. Finau
    2. Savea
    3. Sotutu

    Could have been a runner if Ardie had stayed at 7.

    He played 6 against Ireland in the 2019 World Cup 46-14 towelling of the Irish funnily enough.

    Dan54D D 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to Jet on last edited by
    #627

    @Jet said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    Read, Carter, Ben Smith
    Savea, McKenzie, Barrett

    One of those trio's embodies clarity of role and specialisation.

    The other trio is a bunch of stray Jack Russells frolicking in a rubbish dump.

    I'm a Ben Smith fan but in the ABs he played in at least 3 or more positions, not his fault, wasn't necessarily ideal, but doesn't help your argument.

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jet
    wrote on last edited by
    #628

    kiwiinmelbK 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jet
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #629

    @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @Jet said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    Read, Carter, Ben Smith
    Savea, McKenzie, Barrett

    One of those trio's embodies clarity of role and specialisation.

    The other trio is a bunch of stray Jack Russells frolicking in a rubbish dump.

    I'm a Ben Smith fan but in the ABs he played in at least 3 or more positions, not his fault, wasn't necessarily ideal, but doesn't help your argument.

    Dagg.....can I throw in a Dagg?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by Billy Tell
    #630

    As a kiwi overseas you can always throw in a dagg

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Jet on last edited by
    #631

    @Jet said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @DaGrubster said in All Blacks v Argentina II:

    @Jet

    Move on from guy who was voted world player of the year 4 test matches ago?

    Move on from the player who saved our skin 2 tests ago.

    Not necessarily. But I think he should have always been a 7.
    That’s why in my post I said I was being harsh on him.

    He can be both our best player and the team could be more balanced or functional without him at the same time.

    I think both things can be true in parallel.

    1. Finau
    2. Savea
    3. Sotutu

    Could have been a runner if Ardie had stayed at 7.

    He played 6 against Ireland in the 2019 World Cup 46-14 towelling of the Irish funnily enough.

    Funnily enough Ardie was never a good enough 7 to win World player of the year, so perhaps his best position ie really 8?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Online
    D Online
    DaGrubster
    replied to Jet on last edited by
    #632

    @Jet

    I like that backrow.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote on last edited by
    #633

    Just been wondering this week about coaching group etc and who is reponsible or takes responsibility?
    After halftime Jase Ryan on TV named Reece as a player doing a dumb thing that was hurting ABs (no mention of forwards etc?)-Forward coach
    Hansen next day made mention that forwards weren't giving TJ decent ball behind ruck etc.- Inside back coach
    And after game Razor just said they weren't doing what they were training -head coach
    Almost like everyone saying, it's not my fault isn't it??

    Taking the piss a bit fellas, but have been having a bit of a chuckle about it all week!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote on last edited by
    #634

    Hey has anyone heard much on DMac missing bus to Airport at San Diego?

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0

All Blacks v Argentina II
Rugby Matches
allblacksargentina
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.