All Blacks vs England I
-
@MiketheSnow said in All Blacks vs England I:
England should start Baby Face Nelson (ranga prop), Spencer and Finn Smith next week
Yes. No. No.
Baxter did very well for a debutant and steadied the scrum a bit which Marler was struggling to do. The other option is Bevan Road and his scrummaging has been found out time and again at test level. Baxter is a shoo-in for selection.
Spencer was sooo much slower than Mitchell and I can only think he was sent on to change the game into a more kick orientated affair but to me it was noticeable that NZ had more time to counter anything that England did once he was on. As good as he's been for Bath all season I just don't feel he has what it takes at this level. I'd prefer to see Randall as the back up.
Finn Smith is still finding his feet and has seemed a bit overawed playing test rugby. I think he has what it takes but it is not quite happening for him just yet. Marcus Smith did a lot of good stuff but those two missed sitters have blotted his copybook. I'd keep him as the starter and maybe have Slade as a back up place kicker if he effs up again.
-
@booboo said in All Blacks vs England I:
@Tordah said in All Blacks vs England I:
Last two penalties were so bad, should have been exactly the other way around (1st one, Christie should have won it - game over, second one ABs should have been penalised for off their feet).
They were only off feet after England had conceded the penalty. In fact they were only off feet because England had conceded the penalty.
Nah, that was not even a 50/50, more like a 20/80 (against the ABs) for me. Scooter in his post game comments said we were very lucky with that last penalty.
-
@Catogrande said in All Blacks vs England I:
@MiketheSnow said in All Blacks vs England I:
England should start Baby Face Nelson (ranga prop), Spencer and Finn Smith next week
Yes. No. No.
Baxter did very well for a debutant and steadied the scrum a bit which Marler was struggling to do. The other option is Bevan Road and his scrummaging has been found out time and again at test level. Baxter is a shoo-in for selection.
Spencer was sooo much slower than Mitchell and I can only think he was sent on to change the game into a more kick orientated affair but to me it was noticeable that NZ had more time to counter anything that England did once he was on. As good as he's been for Bath all season I just don't feel he has what it takes at this level. I'd prefer to see Randall as the back up.
Finn Smith is still finding his feet and has seemed a bit overawed playing test rugby. I think he has what it takes but it is not quite happening for him just yet. Marcus Smith did a lot of good stuff but those two missed sitters have blotted his copybook. I'd keep him as the starter and maybe have Slade as a back up place kicker if he effs up again.
I'd be tempted to start Finn Smith, who plays club with Mitchell, and save Marcus for when things open up later in match. I felt Earl was guilty of trying too much, although not sure who'd play 8 if he was saved for impact.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks vs England I:
@booboo said in All Blacks vs England I:
@Tordah said in All Blacks vs England I:
Last two penalties were so bad, should have been exactly the other way around (1st one, Christie should have won it - game over, second one ABs should have been penalised for off their feet).
They were only off feet after England had conceded the penalty. In fact they were only off feet because England had conceded the penalty.
Nah, that was not even a 50/50, more like a 20/80 (against the ABs) for me. Scooter in his post game comments said we were very lucky with that last penalty.
It might have looked wrong, because it all happened fast, but the sequence was that England conceded first.
Why are we struggling to accept a legit penalty in our favour?
Kiwi guilt?
-
Obviously there is a lot of hyperbole and writing to an Ozzie audience, but the core is correct - earn the right to go wide. We still can't deal with rush/blitz defences cos were still trying to 2015 them. Ain't working.
I give more space for razor to implement his tactics, but I really hope there is change and we get more hard carrying munters on the field
-
People have got short memories. I remember days in the not too distant past where we had a headless chicken midfield, no front row, sacrificial dinks and a decent second five on the wing.
Currently we are trending upward -
-
@Daffy-Jaffy didn't feel like he gained a lot of ground when doing so, would be interesting to see that stat.
-
Stats can be misleading, and I'm a Tele'a fan.
I would posit that Tele'a rarely beats a defender 1-on-1. In traffic he often beats 2-3 players in gaining under 10m of territory
-
@pakman said in All Blacks vs England I:
@Catogrande said in All Blacks vs England I:
@MiketheSnow said in All Blacks vs England I:
England should start Baby Face Nelson (ranga prop), Spencer and Finn Smith next week
Yes. No. No.
Baxter did very well for a debutant and steadied the scrum a bit which Marler was struggling to do. The other option is Bevan Road and his scrummaging has been found out time and again at test level. Baxter is a shoo-in for selection.
Spencer was sooo much slower than Mitchell and I can only think he was sent on to change the game into a more kick orientated affair but to me it was noticeable that NZ had more time to counter anything that England did once he was on. As good as he's been for Bath all season I just don't feel he has what it takes at this level. I'd prefer to see Randall as the back up.
Finn Smith is still finding his feet and has seemed a bit overawed playing test rugby. I think he has what it takes but it is not quite happening for him just yet. Marcus Smith did a lot of good stuff but those two missed sitters have blotted his copybook. I'd keep him as the starter and maybe have Slade as a back up place kicker if he effs up again.
I'd be tempted to start Finn Smith, who plays club with Mitchell, and save Marcus for when things open up later in match. I felt Earl was guilty of trying too much, although not sure who'd play 8 if he was saved for impact.
I’m far less inclined to think that actually happens these days with how benches are used and how teams play.
Last Saturday I thought things actually got tighter in the latter parts of the match and the play was more narrow.
-
@ACT-Crusader because Marcus wasn't on and NZ replaced their fullback with a carthorse. Duh.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks vs England I:
@pakman said in All Blacks vs England I:
@Catogrande said in All Blacks vs England I:
@MiketheSnow said in All Blacks vs England I:
England should start Baby Face Nelson (ranga prop), Spencer and Finn Smith next week
Yes. No. No.
Baxter did very well for a debutant and steadied the scrum a bit which Marler was struggling to do. The other option is Bevan Road and his scrummaging has been found out time and again at test level. Baxter is a shoo-in for selection.
Spencer was sooo much slower than Mitchell and I can only think he was sent on to change the game into a more kick orientated affair but to me it was noticeable that NZ had more time to counter anything that England did once he was on. As good as he's been for Bath all season I just don't feel he has what it takes at this level. I'd prefer to see Randall as the back up.
Finn Smith is still finding his feet and has seemed a bit overawed playing test rugby. I think he has what it takes but it is not quite happening for him just yet. Marcus Smith did a lot of good stuff but those two missed sitters have blotted his copybook. I'd keep him as the starter and maybe have Slade as a back up place kicker if he effs up again.
I'd be tempted to start Finn Smith, who plays club with Mitchell, and save Marcus for when things open up later in match. I felt Earl was guilty of trying too much, although not sure who'd play 8 if he was saved for impact.
I’m far less inclined to think that actually happens these days with how benches are used and how teams play.
Last Saturday I thought things actually got tighter in the latter parts of the match and the play was more narrow.
That’s the theory, but grant you it didn’t happen on Saturday.
-
Telea is a very useful player, he doesn't have the top end pace to score long range tries, but he's extremely dangerous when close to the line and causes defenses real headaches. I think we need Clarke on the left though, hopefully he gets picked when fit again, he's a special player and his power gives us a point of difference in the back three.
-
@Bones said in All Blacks vs England I:
@Daffy-Jaffy didn't feel like he gained a lot of ground when doing so, would be interesting to see that stat.
Last season he was on the end of few longer range opportunities that had him beating multiple defenders in a single run, plus his closer in work. So not surprised by these stats.
What was surprising on Saturday was that there were at least 2 or 3 opportunities where I thought we could’ve seen one of those runs, but it didn’t happen.
-
@Bones said in All Blacks vs England I:
@Daffy-Jaffy didn't feel like he gained a lot of ground when doing so, would be interesting to see that stat.
I think some of it is due to his workrate, he's not afraid of getting in close to the ruck and picking and going or having a one-off run where he beats a few defenders so gets a few "beaten defenders" that other outside backs who never get close to the ruck don't get.
I understand where you and others are coming form in that he does seem to beat a lot of defenders without gaining a great deal of meters. I would think that's mainly the "fault" for want of a better word of the AB attack pattern which can't seem to get the ball to him in space and he's continually weaving his way through traffic.
So instead of getting the ball in space and weaving his way past wingers and fullbacks he's basically side-stepping the incoming cover defence, which then leads him back inside into even more cover defence so beating a couple of defenders doesn't gain you much. And that's not his fault and he does really well in the limited space he has, I'd just love to see him get a lot more space and time and have more 1:1 instead of 1:5 oppertunities.
-
@Windows97 said in All Blacks vs England I:
@Bones said in All Blacks vs England I:
@Daffy-Jaffy didn't feel like he gained a lot of ground when doing so, would be interesting to see that stat.
I think some of it is due to his workrate, he's not afraid of getting in close to the ruck and picking and going or having a one-off run where he beats a few defenders so gets a few "beaten defenders" that other outside backs who never get close to the ruck don't get.
I understand where you and others are coming form in that he does seem to beat a lot of defenders without gaining a great deal of meters. I would think that's mainly the "fault" for want of a better word of the AB attack pattern which can't seem to get the ball to him in space and he's continually weaving his way through traffic.
So instead of getting the ball in space and weaving his way past wingers and fullbacks he's basically side-stepping the incoming cover defence, which then leads him back inside into even more cover defence so beating a couple of defenders doesn't gain you much. And that's not his fault and he does really well in the limited space he has, I'd just love to see him get a lot more space and time and have more 1:1 instead of 1:5 oppertunities.
He was put in to outside space in the First test but didn't have the pace to sustain the outside break so got run down pretty easily.
-
