• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

RWC SF: England v Springboks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
englandspringboks
1.1k Posts 82 Posters 69.3k Views
RWC SF: England v Springboks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    wrote on last edited by
    #1074

    Not likely.
    Bongi could sue for defamation though. Not against Curry per se but more likely the RFU for that statement.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #1075

    @Chris-B said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    @Dodge Shades of Susie if the Boks lose.

    They'll be blaming being upset by a bad Curry! 🙂

    Post of the year

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Billy Webb on last edited by
    #1076

    @Billy-Webb said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    @Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    No due process, repeat accusation, can only imagine the gnashing of teeth if the accusation had been the other way around. The abuse Tom Curry has received online is shameful

    I have tried to stay away from this topic.
    But Tom Curry receiving online abuse is shameful and cannot be condoned under any circumstances.

    Equally, the RFU doubling down on the claim of racist behaviour from Bongi when a WR investigation over 5 days and many independent pundit evaluations point to Curry most likely misinterpreting Afrikaans is absolutely shameful too. In my view that RFU statement is disgraceful for that part.

    For context, South Africans are extremely sensitive to racist behaviour which carries all sorts of penalties.
    Equally, a false claim of racist behaviour against someone can also land you with jail time in SA.

    Tbf, unless there is absolutely smoking gun proof there is no way WR is going to discipline a player for this days before the final. It has absolute shit storm written all over it. For obvious reasons. Too hard basket and definitely not the kind of press they want.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dodge
    replied to Billy Webb on last edited by
    #1077

    @Billy-Webb said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    @Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    No due process, repeat accusation, can only imagine the gnashing of teeth if the accusation had been the other way around. The abuse Tom Curry has received online is shameful

    I have tried to stay away from this topic.
    But Tom Curry receiving online abuse is shameful and cannot be condoned under any circumstances.

    Equally, the RFU doubling down on the claim of racist behaviour from Bongi when a WR investigation over 5 days and many independent pundit evaluations point to Curry most likely misinterpreting Afrikaans is absolutely shameful too. In my view that RFU statement is disgraceful for that part.

    For context, South Africans are extremely sensitive to racist behaviour which carries all sorts of penalties.
    Equally, a false claim of racist behaviour against someone can also land you with jail time in SA.

    Yes we’ve all seen all the fan videos claiming to exonerate Bongi, except none of them refer to the moment it supposedly happened. People are choosing to believe what they believe based on who they support and then hurling abuse at the person making the complaint.

    We’ve no idea what happened but the investigation so called, didn’t appear to interview either of the only two people who know the truth.

    I’ve also stayed out of it, but the immediate decision that it didn’t happen by most people, and the abuse that followed has just pissed me off. Seems to me that since the same player has been accused before, a proper investigation should have taken place.

    Billy WebbB Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
    7
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to OomPB on last edited by sparky
    #1078

    @OomPB said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    Can they charge Curry?

    Not likely. But there could be in a civil case in the UK against the RFU.

    Equally Curry or/and the RFU might look into implications under French law if they judge they haven’t been adequately protected by World Rugby.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    replied to Dodge on last edited by
    #1079

    @Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    @Billy-Webb said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    @Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    No due process, repeat accusation, can only imagine the gnashing of teeth if the accusation had been the other way around. The abuse Tom Curry has received online is shameful

    I have tried to stay away from this topic.
    But Tom Curry receiving online abuse is shameful and cannot be condoned under any circumstances.

    Equally, the RFU doubling down on the claim of racist behaviour from Bongi when a WR investigation over 5 days and many independent pundit evaluations point to Curry most likely misinterpreting Afrikaans is absolutely shameful too. In my view that RFU statement is disgraceful for that part.

    For context, South Africans are extremely sensitive to racist behaviour which carries all sorts of penalties.
    Equally, a false claim of racist behaviour against someone can also land you with jail time in SA.

    Yes we’ve all seen all the fan videos claiming to exonerate Bongi, except none of them refer to the moment it supposedly happened. People are choosing to believe what they believe based on who they support and then hurling abuse at the person making the complaint.

    We’ve no idea what happened but the investigation so called, didn’t appear to interview either of the only two people who know the truth.

    I’ve also stayed out of it, but the immediate decision that it didn’t happen by most people, and the abuse that followed has just pissed me off. Seems to me that since the same player has been accused before, a proper investigation should have taken place.

    So, World Rugby took circa 5 days to review 2 games and came up with nothing.
    Yet the RFU can outright call Bongi a racist based on what is possibly / probably a misinterpreted Afrikaans phrase / phrases shown to be commonly used by the Boks... and that's ok?

    That's not some arbitrary individual, that's a national governing body of a sport behaving like that.
    With a published, public statement.
    If you want to talk about being pissed off - that's the bit that's got me wound up.

    The RFU can "Choose my side" (google translate to Afrikaans).

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Dodge on last edited by
    #1080

    @Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    @Billy-Webb said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    @Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    No due process, repeat accusation, can only imagine the gnashing of teeth if the accusation had been the other way around. The abuse Tom Curry has received online is shameful

    I have tried to stay away from this topic.
    But Tom Curry receiving online abuse is shameful and cannot be condoned under any circumstances.

    Equally, the RFU doubling down on the claim of racist behaviour from Bongi when a WR investigation over 5 days and many independent pundit evaluations point to Curry most likely misinterpreting Afrikaans is absolutely shameful too. In my view that RFU statement is disgraceful for that part.

    For context, South Africans are extremely sensitive to racist behaviour which carries all sorts of penalties.
    Equally, a false claim of racist behaviour against someone can also land you with jail time in SA.

    Yes we’ve all seen all the fan videos claiming to exonerate Bongi, except none of them refer to the moment it supposedly happened. People are choosing to believe what they believe based on who they support and then hurling abuse at the person making the complaint.

    We’ve no idea what happened but the investigation so called, didn’t appear to interview either of the only two people who know the truth.

    I’ve also stayed out of it, but the immediate decision that it didn’t happen by most people, and the abuse that followed has just pissed me off. Seems to me that since the same player has been accused before, a proper investigation should have taken place.

    All I know is that "white side" is rather close to "the dog ate my homework" on the bs meter.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Billy Webb on last edited by
    #1081

    @Billy-Webb said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    @Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    @Billy-Webb said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    @Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    No due process, repeat accusation, can only imagine the gnashing of teeth if the accusation had been the other way around. The abuse Tom Curry has received online is shameful

    I have tried to stay away from this topic.
    But Tom Curry receiving online abuse is shameful and cannot be condoned under any circumstances.

    Equally, the RFU doubling down on the claim of racist behaviour from Bongi when a WR investigation over 5 days and many independent pundit evaluations point to Curry most likely misinterpreting Afrikaans is absolutely shameful too. In my view that RFU statement is disgraceful for that part.

    For context, South Africans are extremely sensitive to racist behaviour which carries all sorts of penalties.
    Equally, a false claim of racist behaviour against someone can also land you with jail time in SA.

    Yes we’ve all seen all the fan videos claiming to exonerate Bongi, except none of them refer to the moment it supposedly happened. People are choosing to believe what they believe based on who they support and then hurling abuse at the person making the complaint.

    We’ve no idea what happened but the investigation so called, didn’t appear to interview either of the only two people who know the truth.

    I’ve also stayed out of it, but the immediate decision that it didn’t happen by most people, and the abuse that followed has just pissed me off. Seems to me that since the same player has been accused before, a proper investigation should have taken place.

    So, World Rugby took circa 5 days to review 2 games and came up with nothing.
    Yet the RFU can outright call Bongi a racist based on what is possibly / probably a misinterpreted Afrikaans phrase / phrases shown to be commonly used by the Boks... and that's ok?

    That's not some arbitrary individual, that's a national governing body of a sport behaving like that.
    With a published, public statement.
    If you want to talk about being pissed off - that's the bit that's got me wound up.

    The RFU can "Choose my side" (google translate to Afrikaans).

    WR were always going to sweep it under the carpet. The big question is why the RFU are doubling down. Could be that they're still salty about the SF, but they really have zero to gain from doing this. Before I was firmly in the camp that it there was nothing in it and that Curry should have focussed on the biggest game of his life and not bad words hurting his feelings. Now I not so sure. Again, why double down?

    Billy WebbB boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by
    #1082

    It is worth adding that the RFU’s barrister, Richard Smith KC, is about as experienced and respected as you can get in sports law.

    dev.login

    Richard Smith KC

    Richard Smith KC

    Richard Smith KC is a Crime barrister and Sports Law barrister. He has over 35 years' experience at the Bar.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #1083

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    The big question is why the RFU are doubling down. Could be that they're still salty about the SF, but they really have zero to gain from doing this. Before I was firmly in the camp that it there was nothing in it and that Curry should have focussed on the biggest game of his life and not bad words hurting his feelings. Now I not so sure. Again, why double down?

    We're talking about the RFU here.
    Not really the paragon of a thoughtful well run organization with a bunch of geniuses at the top of late are they?

    Rancid SchnitzelR CatograndeC 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Billy Webb on last edited by
    #1084

    @Billy-Webb said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    The big question is why the RFU are doubling down. Could be that they're still salty about the SF, but they really have zero to gain from doing this. Before I was firmly in the camp that it there was nothing in it and that Curry should have focussed on the biggest game of his life and not bad words hurting his feelings. Now I not so sure. Again, why double down?

    We're talking about the RFU here.
    Not really the paragon of a thoughtful well run organization with a bunch of geniuses at the top of late are they?

    Swap RFU with WR.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #1085

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    The big question is why the RFU are doubling down.

    This is a really interesting question.

    There's no reverse of result

    So there seems to be some thought of protecting their guy. They really think they're right.

    W 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to Billy Webb on last edited by
    #1086

    @Billy-Webb said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    The big question is why the RFU are doubling down. Could be that they're still salty about the SF, but they really have zero to gain from doing this. Before I was firmly in the camp that it there was nothing in it and that Curry should have focussed on the biggest game of his life and not bad words hurting his feelings. Now I not so sure. Again, why double down?

    We're talking about the RFU here.
    Not really the paragon of a thoughtful well run organization with a bunch of geniuses at the top of late are they?

    Whilst I agree with you view on the RFU, what makes me wonder is that they have effectively broken ranks with the status quo and that is not really in their DNA.

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    wrote on last edited by
    #1087

    Because they’re Kants?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by sparky
    #1088

    Steve Borthwick not happy with World Rugby, accusing them of not following due process. He voices his approval for the RFU statement.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #1089

    @sparky

    It more and more looks as though there is something that it is felt has not been addressed. Too many people putting their necks on the line for it to be deemed otherwise.

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #1090

    @Catogrande Normally extremely cautious people are going all in here. I’m beginning to wonder if they is a lot more to the story than has been made public.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    wrote on last edited by
    #1091

    There’s less.

    borthwinger is only too keen to keep hiding behind this malicious smokescreen instead of talking about how he was relaxing and congratulating himself at 60 minutes just as the game was turning.

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Smuts on last edited by
    #1092

    @Smuts said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    There’s less.

    borthwinger is only too keen to keep hiding behind this malicious smokescreen instead of talking about how he was relaxing and congratulating himself at 60 minutes just as the game was turning.

    Not really, Borthwick’s team exceeded expectations at home. Even if his side lose tomorrow night, he can probably negotiate a new contract with the England set-up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    wrote on last edited by Smuts
    #1093

    You’ve elided my point.

    If EJ was still the England coach and they’d choked like that, would the boys at the Telegraph/Mail etc be riding this nonsense or would they be calling the coach out for what was a humiliating failure to adapt to the boks’ in game tactical changes - changes that Borthwick ought to have prepared for.

    Especially as getting humped at the scrum by the boks is a pro that should’ve been fixed in the four years since 2019.

    The press is happy - accusing South Africans of racism sells far more papers than dry technical analysis of their shortcomings as a sporting nation.

    On top of all this, I’d bet dollars to donuts there’s some PR manager pushing this for fear of what ought to be righteous anger at recklessly raising such an insidious allegation.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    3

RWC SF: England v Springboks
Rugby Matches
englandspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.