RWC SF: England v Springboks
-
@sparky said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Sinkler and Vunipola should have been no where near the squad, let alone the 23. They are low below Test standard these days. Nostalgia picks that bit England in the arse.
Although the two old props were much better than their replacements, and the game changed after that. Vunipola was shit.
-
@Damo said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Scrum decisions were the difference in the end. I'd like to see the last one again from a good angle.
To be fair, from above it looked like SA turned in first, from BOK’s view it looked like genge followed him and lifted him - probably would have given the same even if it may not have been right.
-
@kev said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Darren said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
The scoreboard is keeping things interesting, and if I had a team in this I'd be on the edge of my seat.
But from a neutral point of view, it is about everything that is wrong with rugby in one game.Rugby like it or not is competing for the peoples time re entertainment. That was everything that is wrong with rugby. Teams that don’t want to play with the ball. Endless kicking. Close and tense but just a shit game.
Sorry you just don't get it
-
@chimoaus said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@mencey said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Ref need shooting. That last penalty was a joke.
If Farrell had kept his mouth shut that call would not have mattered, just saying.
Very true
-
So much better than I expected us to be, they gave me hope and it hurts now but I’m proud of how they muscled up and turned up. Right now feel hard done by but we had plenty of opportunities not to shoot ourselves in the foot.
Congrats to SA, they find a way. They’ll be hard to beat but they didn’t look the monster pack they have done and I think NZ have at least a 50:50 chance
-
-
@BerniesCorner said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@kev said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Darren said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
The scoreboard is keeping things interesting, and if I had a team in this I'd be on the edge of my seat.
But from a neutral point of view, it is about everything that is wrong with rugby in one game.Rugby like it or not is competing for the peoples time re entertainment. That was everything that is wrong with rugby. Teams that don’t want to play with the ball. Endless kicking. Close and tense but just a shit game.
Sorry you just don't get it
I get close rugby. As entertainment this game gave very little opportunity for the players to show a wide range of skills. What I want to see is players running with the ball in hand. I think most people would.
-
-
@kev said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@BerniesCorner said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@kev said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Darren said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
The scoreboard is keeping things interesting, and if I had a team in this I'd be on the edge of my seat.
But from a neutral point of view, it is about everything that is wrong with rugby in one game.Rugby like it or not is competing for the peoples time re entertainment. That was everything that is wrong with rugby. Teams that don’t want to play with the ball. Endless kicking. Close and tense but just a shit game.
Sorry you just don't get it
I get close rugby. As entertainment this game gave very little opportunity for the players to show a wide range of skills. What I want to see is players running with the ball in hand. I think most people would.
In some ways it good that England lost. Because if teams win it all that play like England do, I would almost stop watching rugby.
-
@LABCAT said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Why are people complaining about the try?
I couldn't see anything wrong with it.
Shame England didn't win as I doubt they would have any chance against the All Blacks.
Because the runner off the back of the lineoit was tackled to the ground and got up and went again without releasing
