• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

RWC Week 1: France v All Blacks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
rwcfranceallblacks
2.1k Posts 112 Posters 208.8k Views
RWC Week 1: France v All Blacks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by
    #350

    Please let the game start! I can’t take any more of McLeod at 2nd five! Leicester at 2nd five! If only Roigard was there!

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to Darren on last edited by
    #351

    @Darren said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

    frugby are you really arguing to put shitty replacements on the bench when we have a really good match winner not being selected? That's an argument that's not making a lot of sense.
    I'll probably also put McKenzie on the bench too, he could really change a game around and offer a point of difference.

    No I'm not arguing that. Maybe read what I actually said.

    I'll say it loud and clear, I think Christie is terrible, probably not in my top 5 halfbacks in NZ, let alone being on the bench for this test.

    I think Roigard is great, and will be great, but when we lose (because I think we will) people will likely scapegoat Christie, and will discuss the what if Roigard was on the bench?

    In reality, I think we are more likely to lose because of a lack of a good tighthead prop, the lack of a proper blindside flanker, the lack of a hard-carrying 12 and the lack of a proper backup lock - granted in these positions, the coach's hands were somewhat tied.

    Of course we could and should criticise the selection of Christie, but for the maximum 15 minutes he is likely to play, I don't actually think it greatly affects the outcome of this game.

    If it does, and we lose because Christie did some terrible kicks, or some shitty passes, just like everyone else I'll be hounding it, and I hold my hands up, but I really don't believe he will he even get 10 minutes, and I don't believe it will have a material outcome on the game.

    Joans Town JonesJ 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Darren
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #352

    @Victor-Meldrew

    Couldn't even tell the difference when he come on against the Bok.

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #353

    Roigard is tailored for test rugby IMO : best kicking and running halfback in NZ by a country mile, good pass and a physique only matched by Perenara's. It would have been very useful to throw him against a tiring defense.

    1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCorner
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #354

    @Victor-Meldrew said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

    @Dan54 said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

    Yep, and as almost president of Roigard fan club myself, I not sure if the cauldron of opening match against home team at WC best place for a kid to get experience, though I can see him getting a few games in other pool games, and maybe get a spot by QFs.

    Nah, Roigard is proven winner in RWC games. Only a clown like Foster wouldn't play him....

    ...style of thing

    Are you still banging the drum that Razor hasn't got enough international experience...
    Apologies. The nerves are a bit frayed after Twickenham

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to Darren on last edited by
    #355

    @Darren said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

    @Victor-Meldrew

    Couldn't even tell the difference when he come on against the Bok.

    So logically then, as he made a difference and was clearly better than Smith, you're arguing he should start ahead of Smith against France?

    Can't agree there.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #356

    So, when's kick off...

    Team is selected, people can piss and moan all they like, the team is pretty much what was expected.

    These guys can win, however if they will remains to be seen

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Darren
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #357

    @Victor-Meldrew

    Oh hell no
    But everyone was having a bad day, nice to bring on someone to turn the game around a bit. Just don't think Christie does that. He is not going to add a spark that might make a difference.
    I'm just not liking the makeup of this team, and the squad in general just seems to be selected badly.

    Victor MeldrewV No QuarterN Dan54D 3 Replies Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #358

    Eddie Jones recently made a comment about the importance of halfback defence in the current game so i suspect that's why Christie gets the nod.

    My issue with that logic is only focusing on defence doesn't pay enough attention to kicking, distribution, decision making and sniping - all areas where Roigard is superior and indirectly can help defence (field position, smoother attack leading to less time on defence etc).

    Having said all that he's picked now so I hope Finlay dominates.

    F taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #359

    @KiwiMurph said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

    Eddie Jones recently made a comment about the importance of halfback defence in the current game so i suspect that's why Christie gets the nod.

    My issue with that logic is only focusing on defence doesn't pay enough attention to kicking, distribution, decision making and sniping - all areas where Roigard is superior and indirectly can help defence (field position, smoother attack leading to less time on defence etc).

    Having said all that he's picked now so I hope Finlay dominates.

    If they wanted a defensive halfback, I feel as though Fakatava is the best defensive halfback available... maybe I'm wrong?

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #360

    @KiwiMurph said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

    Eddie Jones recently made a comment about the importance of halfback defence in the current game so i suspect that's why Christie gets the nod.

    so now we are basing our selections on what eddie says 😉

    Christie is an excellent defender, particularly cover defence, if he can get his decision making and clearance back to what he showed when he first made the ABs then he isnt a concern.

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to Darren on last edited by
    #361

    @Darren said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

    But everyone was having a bad day,

    Yeah, and as much of a Roigard fan as I am, there's the possibility that playing OK and scoring a great individual try in his second Test against a team 35 points up just might not be the definitive guide to his qualities in an RWC competition.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #362

    @taniwharugby said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

    Christie is an excellent defender, particularly cover defence, if he can get his decision making and clearance back to what he showed when he first made the ABs then he isnt a concern.

    He's gone backwards this year a fair way in that department. Never the quickest of players but was pretty solid in Tests last year coming on a replacement.

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #363

    @frugby Fakatava arguably has the most potential of any of the contenders, but at this stage he just makes too many mistakes. The chances of him turning our possession into our defence are not outweighed by his defensive ability.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by
    #364

    The Roigard non selection is silly but it also shows how inflexible Foster is. I really don't know why we even bothered having the ABs in SR when clearly form doesn't matter to the guy, he had already picked this AB team at the start of the year.

    Roigard would have been the perfect impact player on Friday. With the forecasted heat, players are bound to get tired and there will be gaps around the rucks late in the game as a result. This is the one game where you should select a guy like Roigard who has the running game to exploit those gaps.

    Victor MeldrewV F Joans Town JonesJ 3 Replies Last reply
    5
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #365

    @akan004 said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

    The Roigard non selection is silly but it also shows how inflexible Foster is. I really don't know why we even bothered having the ABs in SR when clearly form doesn't matter to the guy, he had already picked this AB team at the start of the year.

    The same criticism can be made against Henry and Hansen for sticking with Nonu at 12 despite being crap in SR.

    Canes4lifeC A KiwiMurphK FrankF 4 Replies Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    wrote on last edited by
    #366

    The guys just need to hang in the game for 60 minutes, then we can roll out our impact bench of Christie and Havili and run away with it

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by Canes4life
    #367

    @Victor-Meldrew Nonu was a beast for the Canes in 2015 though. If Carter hadn't pulled out his magic when he did to win World Player of the year, Nonu probably would have won that accolade.

    And plus, a underperforming Nonu at Super level was still quality, especially when you compare him to the 12s running around atm. A really good Christie is still average.

    F Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #368

    @akan004 said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

    The Roigard non selection is silly but it also shows how inflexible Foster is. I really don't know why we even bothered having the ABs in SR when clearly form doesn't matter to the guy, he had already picked this AB team at the start of the year.

    Not sure this is entirely true. Despite what we may think, I think the evidence would suggest that at the end of last year, the pecking order of halfbacks was probably:

    1. Smith
    2. Perenara
    3. Christie
    4. Weber
    5. Fakatava
    6. Ratima
    7. Roigard
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #369

    @Canes4life said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

    @Victor-Meldrew Nonu was a beast for the Canes in 2015 though. If Carter hadn't pulled out his magic when he did to win World Player of the year, Nonu probably would have won that accolade.

    And plus, a underperforming Nonu at Super level was still quality, especially when you compare him to the 12s running around atm. A really good Christie is still average.

    Yep. A shit Nonu is still 2x better than TJ Faiane playing at his best.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

RWC Week 1: France v All Blacks
Rugby Matches
rwcfranceallblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.