• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.6k Posts 96 Posters 134.8k Views
All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to ploughboy on last edited by booboo
    #1264

    @ploughboy said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @booboo nah we lost because the bok played better. not making excuses just little things make a difference which add uo to a [poor performance

    I'm not taking shots, I'm doing it (identifying contributing reasons) too.

    Just finding it amusing when I step back and notice it all.

    There's plenty of contributory factors, and I'm not writing us off, or inking them in on the basis of that game.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #1265

    @booboo said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @ploughboy said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @booboo nah we lost because the bok played better. not making excuses just little things make a difference which add uo to a [poor performance

    I'm not taking shots, I'm doing it (identifying contributing reasons) too.

    Just finding it amusing when I step back and notice it all.

    There's plenty of contributory factors, and I'm not writing us off, or inking them in on the basis of that game.

    The weekend's results just show that this cup is wide open. If you don't show up mentally and physically you can seriously get beaten

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #1266

    @canefan said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @booboo said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @ploughboy said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @booboo nah we lost because the bok played better. not making excuses just little things make a difference which add uo to a [poor performance

    I'm not taking shots, I'm doing it (identifying contributing reasons) too.

    Just finding it amusing when I step back and notice it all.

    There's plenty of contributory factors, and I'm not writing us off, or inking them in on the basis of that game.

    The weekend's results just show that this cup is wide open. If you don't show up mentally and physically you can seriously get beaten

    I commented on the wildly swinging, week to week results last year.

    It's always been small margins swing results in Tests. Now it's small margins severely impact scores.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    replied to ploughboy on last edited by
    #1267

    @ploughboy said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    one thing we will never know but i would imagine our training load would be huge at the moment which would facter into fatigue later into game

    In a recent interview with shag , he talked about the training preparing for the final stages as being the most important part . And the pool games , you just do enough to qualify, and he spoke about 2015 where they were flat in the pool games from exactly that .

    He suggested they would be following a similar program this year .

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1268

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    This game wouldn't even be played if there wasn't a RWC.

    Bollocks.

    Every other team is playing warm-up games. Many are playing several. Yet you think we should go into the RWC absolutely cold? If we had gone in cold, this performance would have been against France.

    I've stayed off commenting on the Fern this year because I've ridden the Foster train before, and I am well aware that this is exactly what his teams do. Always have.

    The bad parts of that game were pure Foster. Back to poor exits. Back to defensive bombs. Back to poor discipline. Still never dropping players, ever, no matter how bad. Still the game plan from 2005, where we think we can run other sides off their feet. Still "clever" selections like making sure our best hooker gets almost no game time, loses his mojo, and is then terrible when you finally let him get onto the field.

    After four years of this bullshit, I can't believe some of you think Foster is not the main culprit. How many terrible records does he have to break before you realise that he is a dreadful coach? You just watched that dreck, and think, "you know what, I'll stick up for him".

    And for those of you who think that the All Blacks have had a wake-up call and won't be this bad again, well I have news for you. We will never be this bad again -- it was, after all our biggest loss ever -- but Foster is capable of pretty much anything, when it comes to bad.

    S TimT 2 Replies Last reply
    13
  • FrankF Offline
    FrankF Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by Frank
    #1269

    Damn that Roigard try was a great individual effort! He beat three or four players.

    1 Reply Last reply
    12
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #1270

    @Machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @antipodean said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @Machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    And he can't own up when his team puts what is objectively the worst performance ever in black

    Utter fucking nonsense.

    So a28 point loss isn't objectively the worst ever? Carry on in your dream world. He at no point in the interview admits anything but good learnings. Not 'we didn't prepare well enough' nor 'the tactics weren't quite right' doing shitty little kicks in our 22.Just we will learn. Except they don't and haven't over the last 6 odd years

    Losing to Munster 12-0 in 78 is the worst ever…

    HigginsH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Online
    P Online
    ploughboy
    replied to kiwiinmelb on last edited by
    #1271

    @kiwiinmelb was thinking about 2015 when i posted that. with out speadout games would make sense

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Steve on last edited by
    #1272

    @Steve said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    The team is a raking punt light both at 10 and 15.

    That's why Stevenson is one of the 47 wings in the squad, no, wait, that was just me dreaming again.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #1273

    There was one Bok exit in thr 2nd half that had me in tears. They swung right and wipers kicked out at around our 40. No nonsense, high effect. 22 to our 40, no fuss.

    chimoausC 1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steve
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by Steve
    #1274

    @Chester-Draws said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    Still never dropping players, ever, no matter how bad.

    This is his biggest weakness in my opinion.

    In the past, rightly or wrongly, other managers made big calls with some big players. Mitchell dropped Cullen while he still had something to offer, Nonu got dropped for the 2007 RWC, Dagg missed out in 2015, Ben Smith and Cane dropped for the semi in 2019.

    Foster has been in the setup for so long that it seems he has a cadre of undroppable players. Cane and Beaudy come to mind immediately. At times during his tenure they patently did not deserve their place on the field on merit. Who is the biggest name on his kill sheet? Akira Ioane? Sotutu?

    They are low hanging fruit.

    As I have said many times on this forum.

    The crest on the front is bigger than any name on the back. Or at least it should be for a team that prides itself on legacy and winning records.

    S KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    7
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by chimoaus
    #1275

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    There was one Bok exit in thr 2nd half that had me in tears. They swung right and wipers kicked out at around our 40. No nonsense, high effect. 22 to our 40, no fuss.

    Yep, I noticed that, they were very effective at exits in Mt Smart also, the goal should always be the halfway line, anything less than that just puts you back under pressure.

    The fact we got a penalty inside our 22 and the touch finder barely went past the 22 highlights this issue.

    It is odd as we have a big boot at 12 that should be able to clear better. Don't Ireland utilise Lowe a lot? Teams seem to have worked this out, no idea why we persist with RM and BB who seem to struggle with this a lot.

    It really does make the CC selection very odd as you really want a winger who is great under the high ball, has a big punt, good on D and can finish when needed.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steve
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #1276

    @chimoaus said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    There was one Bok exit in thr 2nd half that had me in tears. They swung right and wipers kicked out at around our 40. No nonsense, high effect. 22 to our 40, no fuss.

    Yep, I noticed that, they were very effective at exits in Mt Smart also, the goal should always be the halfway line, anything less than that just puts you back under pressure.

    The fact we got a penalty inside our 22 and the touch finder barely went past the 22 highlights this issue.

    It is odd as we have a big boot at 12 that should be able to clear better. Don't Ireland utilise Lowe a lot? Teams seem to have worked this out, no idea why we persist with RM and BB who seem to struggle with this a lot.

    It really does make the CC selection very odd as you really want a winger who is great under the high ball, has a big punt, good on D and can finish when needed.

    And based on Telea's cameos thus far, Clarke looks completely and utterly redundant in the squad.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Steve on last edited by
    #1277

    @Steve he’s ahead of Narawa based on previous selections. Plus Narawa has struggled to get over his niggle

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steve
    replied to Steve on last edited by
    #1278

    @Steve said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @Chester-Draws said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    Still never dropping players, ever, no matter how bad.

    This is his biggest weakness in my opinion.

    In the past, rightly or wrongly, other managers made big calls with some big players. Mitchell dropped Cullen while he still had something to offer, Nonu got dropped for the 2007 RWC, Dagg missed out in 2015, Ben Smith and Cane dropped for the semi in 2019.

    Foster has been in the setup for so long that it seems he has a cadre of undroppable players. Cane and Beaudy come to mind immediately. At times during his tenure they patently did not deserve their place on the field on merit. Who is the biggest name on his kill sheet? Akira Ioane? Sotutu?

    They are low hanging fruit.

    As I have said many times on this forum.

    The crest on the front is bigger than any name on the back. Or at least it should be for a team that prides itself on legacy and winning records.

    Beaudy has 112 caps now, of which id say the last 30 or so are completely forgettable in comparison to his first 70 odd.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steve
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #1279

    @Duluth said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @Steve he’s ahead of Narawa based on previous selections. Plus Narawa has struggled to get over his niggle

    Does Clarke cover 14?

    Thought Narawa was primarily 14/15.

    Clarke 11 and centre at an absolute straw clutch?

    Open to correction on both.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Steve on last edited by
    #1280

    @Steve

    It’s irrelevant because Telea covers both sides and Narawa is so far down the peaking order of fullback cover

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • HigginsH Offline
    HigginsH Offline
    Higgins
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #1281

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @Machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @antipodean said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @Machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    And he can't own up when his team puts what is objectively the worst performance ever in black

    Utter fucking nonsense.

    So a28 point loss isn't objectively the worst ever? Carry on in your dream world. He at no point in the interview admits anything but good learnings. Not 'we didn't prepare well enough' nor 'the tactics weren't quite right' doing shitty little kicks in our 22.Just we will learn. Except they don't and haven't over the last 6 odd years

    Losing to Munster 12-0 in 78 is the worst ever…

    No it's not, I well remember a real spanking against Sydney 17 - 40 at Penrith in 1992 that was the ultimate pits. That's the same year we had an unbeaten tour of Sth Africa!

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #1282

    @booboo said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    We're finding plenty of "reasons" for the loss huh?

    I think it has been mentioned by many that we simply weren't very good (at all). That might be one of many reasons but it is surely an important one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #1283

    @Duluth said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @Steve

    It’s irrelevant because Telea covers both sides and Narawa is so far down the peaking order of fullback cover

    Probably, but Narawa has a very good boot. I'd like to see more of it at test level but he might make a fine backup 15.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    1

All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.