• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.6k Posts 96 Posters 134.8k Views
All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #1251

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @Steve said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    I can visualise some unsung hero changing the narrative by luck rather than design, thrust into the piece due to injury or suspension. A Roigard or DMAC type getting loads of minutes due to unforeseen circumstances.

    I think the Allblacks are going to belt some big team, either France up first or SA/IRE in the quarters, but can't see them putting it together over consecutive weeks.

    Its going to be ref heavy, TMO heavy, score board ticking in 3's type Rugby.

    Playing rippa rugby in your own 22 in Autumn on NH pitches doesn't look like its going to work 6 weeks in a row.

    The team is a raking punt light both at 10 and 15.

    No pressure valve being offered from 9 either bar the potential of Roigards left boot off the bench.

    They only have to play really well three times: first match, quarters and final. But will want to be coming to boil around Italy match.

    SF a given then?

    TordahT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TordahT Offline
    TordahT Offline
    Tordah
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #1252

    @MiketheSnow said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @Steve said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    I can visualise some unsung hero changing the narrative by luck rather than design, thrust into the piece due to injury or suspension. A Roigard or DMAC type getting loads of minutes due to unforeseen circumstances.

    I think the Allblacks are going to belt some big team, either France up first or SA/IRE in the quarters, but can't see them putting it together over consecutive weeks.

    Its going to be ref heavy, TMO heavy, score board ticking in 3's type Rugby.

    Playing rippa rugby in your own 22 in Autumn on NH pitches doesn't look like its going to work 6 weeks in a row.

    The team is a raking punt light both at 10 and 15.

    No pressure valve being offered from 9 either bar the potential of Roigards left boot off the bench.

    They only have to play really well three times: first match, quarters and final. But will want to be coming to boil around Italy match.

    SF a given then?

    Easy, same as the QF in 2007

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    replied to sparky on last edited by akan004
    #1253

    @sparky said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    A Saturday morning press conference with Foz and more handling of the ball than his side did for 80 minutes yesterday.

    Well there you go, he hinted at not changing the squad. So one of the wingers gets a free holiday in France while we battle injury and fatigue in the loose forwards and locks. We have a genius coach here, QF exit coming up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote on last edited by
    #1254

    I am actually wondering if heads were not in right place yesterday? I actually said to Mrs just before game I was worried with talk, it sounded like they were trying to talk themselves into it being a must win game, and not quite coming off to me. I not suggesting in anyway taking away how well Boks played , or how poor ABs seemed to be, just a thought I had.

    His BobnessH 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to reprobate on last edited by
    #1255

    @reprobate said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @MiketheSnow No, it is not just you. If you followed super rugby this year you would have seen the Chiefs top the table before losing the final to the Crusaders by playing a long territorial kicking game all season with McKenzie and Stevenson.
    Our coaching / tactics are appalling.

    Vs Blues who crashed and burned again

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to kev on last edited by gt12
    #1256

    @kev said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @reprobate said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @MiketheSnow No, it is not just you. If you followed super rugby this year you would have seen the Chiefs top the table before losing the final to the Crusaders by playing a long territorial kicking game all season with McKenzie and Stevenson.
    Our coaching / tactics are appalling.

    Vs Blues who crashed and burned again

    Using a contestable kick heavy game plan.

    I'm wondering if Schmidt is getting a far easier ride than he deserves. It feels a bit moneyball to me, with a (mistaken) consideration of the ratio of contestables to regathers and opposition mistakes versus chance of them getting clean possession and easy scoring opportunities.

    The issue I have with it is that you can easily find yourself down two scores if two of those contestables go against you early, all you need is one great return or a mistake from us, and the opposition will camp out and wait until they can get their points.

    I do see the benefit of it as a tactic at certain times in a tight match, but it can't be the basis of our exit strategy. We need to be able to exit our territory.

    chimoausC 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #1257

    @gt12 This stupid moneyball tactic was in use well before Schmidt, BB has been doing it for years it seems. The Chiefs tactics were so different this year it was refreshing to see. I think DMAC kicked well over twice the penalties as any other team in the comp. Seems even blind freddy can see it is simply not worth the gamble in the test arena.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #1258

    @sparky said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    A Saturday morning press conference with Foz and more handling of the ball than his side did for 80 minutes yesterday.

    Wish they asked him about playing footy in your own 22 when you are under the pump.

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • P Online
    P Online
    ploughboy
    wrote on last edited by
    #1259

    one thing we will never know but i would imagine our training load would be huge at the moment which would facter into fatigue later into game

    kiwiinmelbK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #1260

    And we hadn't played for a month, whereas the Boks had a game last week to get the rust out

    Joans Town JonesJ 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #1261

    We're finding plenty of "reasons" for the loss huh?

    P nostrildamusN 2 Replies Last reply
    7
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1262

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    God you're boring @Machpants

    I'm sure it was Ian Foster who told them to give away dumb penalty after dumb penalty. To dive head first at a player on the ground. To miss tackles. To miss goal kicks.

    How bad are NZ rugby players that they would be amazing except their coach told them not to

    In no way did I say that. My point is the team are under so much pressure, which leads to more errors and penalties by the players, due to tactics. Yes the players were shit, but they have been good. But playing the ball in the 22, cross kicks and short kicks rather than decent exits, is a core problem. It came off beautifully last SA game, an unheard-of two thirds of kicks recovered. When the opposition catch the ball, and ABs get the normal ten percent back, it just creates tries for the opposition and/or more pressure in our red zone. And that had always been a go to tactic for the ABs under foster, and is unbelievably stupid. Attempting too run it out of the 22 even when opposition defence is set, is a foster tactic in the same vein, one little error and you're fucked

    1 Reply Last reply
    11
  • P Online
    P Online
    ploughboy
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #1263

    @booboo nah we lost because the bok played better. not making excuses just little things make a difference which add uo to a [poor performance

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to ploughboy on last edited by booboo
    #1264

    @ploughboy said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @booboo nah we lost because the bok played better. not making excuses just little things make a difference which add uo to a [poor performance

    I'm not taking shots, I'm doing it (identifying contributing reasons) too.

    Just finding it amusing when I step back and notice it all.

    There's plenty of contributory factors, and I'm not writing us off, or inking them in on the basis of that game.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #1265

    @booboo said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @ploughboy said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @booboo nah we lost because the bok played better. not making excuses just little things make a difference which add uo to a [poor performance

    I'm not taking shots, I'm doing it (identifying contributing reasons) too.

    Just finding it amusing when I step back and notice it all.

    There's plenty of contributory factors, and I'm not writing us off, or inking them in on the basis of that game.

    The weekend's results just show that this cup is wide open. If you don't show up mentally and physically you can seriously get beaten

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #1266

    @canefan said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @booboo said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @ploughboy said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @booboo nah we lost because the bok played better. not making excuses just little things make a difference which add uo to a [poor performance

    I'm not taking shots, I'm doing it (identifying contributing reasons) too.

    Just finding it amusing when I step back and notice it all.

    There's plenty of contributory factors, and I'm not writing us off, or inking them in on the basis of that game.

    The weekend's results just show that this cup is wide open. If you don't show up mentally and physically you can seriously get beaten

    I commented on the wildly swinging, week to week results last year.

    It's always been small margins swing results in Tests. Now it's small margins severely impact scores.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    replied to ploughboy on last edited by
    #1267

    @ploughboy said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    one thing we will never know but i would imagine our training load would be huge at the moment which would facter into fatigue later into game

    In a recent interview with shag , he talked about the training preparing for the final stages as being the most important part . And the pool games , you just do enough to qualify, and he spoke about 2015 where they were flat in the pool games from exactly that .

    He suggested they would be following a similar program this year .

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1268

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    This game wouldn't even be played if there wasn't a RWC.

    Bollocks.

    Every other team is playing warm-up games. Many are playing several. Yet you think we should go into the RWC absolutely cold? If we had gone in cold, this performance would have been against France.

    I've stayed off commenting on the Fern this year because I've ridden the Foster train before, and I am well aware that this is exactly what his teams do. Always have.

    The bad parts of that game were pure Foster. Back to poor exits. Back to defensive bombs. Back to poor discipline. Still never dropping players, ever, no matter how bad. Still the game plan from 2005, where we think we can run other sides off their feet. Still "clever" selections like making sure our best hooker gets almost no game time, loses his mojo, and is then terrible when you finally let him get onto the field.

    After four years of this bullshit, I can't believe some of you think Foster is not the main culprit. How many terrible records does he have to break before you realise that he is a dreadful coach? You just watched that dreck, and think, "you know what, I'll stick up for him".

    And for those of you who think that the All Blacks have had a wake-up call and won't be this bad again, well I have news for you. We will never be this bad again -- it was, after all our biggest loss ever -- but Foster is capable of pretty much anything, when it comes to bad.

    S TimT 2 Replies Last reply
    13
  • FrankF Offline
    FrankF Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by Frank
    #1269

    Damn that Roigard try was a great individual effort! He beat three or four players.

    1 Reply Last reply
    12
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #1270

    @Machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @antipodean said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @Machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    And he can't own up when his team puts what is objectively the worst performance ever in black

    Utter fucking nonsense.

    So a28 point loss isn't objectively the worst ever? Carry on in your dream world. He at no point in the interview admits anything but good learnings. Not 'we didn't prepare well enough' nor 'the tactics weren't quite right' doing shitty little kicks in our 22.Just we will learn. Except they don't and haven't over the last 6 odd years

    Losing to Munster 12-0 in 78 is the worst ever…

    HigginsH 1 Reply Last reply
    0

All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.