SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)
-
Whitelock and Blackadder are big losses for the Crusader's but I still think they'll get through. Blues forwards aren't quite there yet to force the result.
I'm amazed to see the line "injury ravaged Crusaders team" and still see Goodhue on the team sheet however.
-
I'm picking a boil over tonight, I think the Blues will get the job done somehow.
The Crusaders without Whitelock in the playoffs are there for the taking. They always go down a cog when he's not on the field and I think with the injury toll to the Crusaders, it might just be the Blues night.
But I also wouldn't put my money on the Crusaders losing so what do I know.
-
I’m so looking forward to this game. We have a shot, we are a good team and well coached these days. Winning away in Christchurch is not easy, and there is an obvious mental hurdle that all teams need against them to cross to get a win.
We also have injuries, having two in one position which is also the main area that the Crusaders will attack is not great. Hopefully Coventry has simple solutions that can be implemented under the blowtorch that’s coming.
Proper battle coming, can’t wait.
-
@Kirwan I with you as a neutral!! Add to that while in Wellington last weekend , I attended the Garage Project brewery and bought a selection of beers to go with my rugby watching this weekend! I not a big drinker these days, but do enjoy a couple of craft beers!
-
-
@KiwiMurph said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Rieko's hands for a centre are abysmal.
Fuck me dead.
Doesn't need to catch it outside Jordie.
-
I don't actually mind Marshall as a comments man, but if I hear hims say "How good was that !!" one more time, I'm likely to chunder...
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
I don't actually mind Marshall as a comments man, but if I hear hims say "How good was that !!" one more time, I'm likely to chunder...
He compliments Nisbos blandness very well