Brisbane Global 10s
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="antipodean" data-cid="595836" data-time="1468197067">
<div>
<p>Real rugby field. Brisbane in February?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Dunno, is Suncorp that bad in Feb? Or are you referring to its use for football? Obviously, I was making a comparison with shitty farm fields.</p> -
<p>you'd have to think under the NZ model, the NZRU would pick up any prize money and maybe just give bonuses to players (who are likely to be WTG players, surely?)</p>
-
<p>I am glad its Super teams and not some other concoction. I'll be watching</p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Stargazer" data-cid="595838" data-time="1468197249">
<div>
<p>Dunno, is Suncorp that bad in Feb? Or are you referring to its use for football? Obviously, I was making a comparison with shitty farm fields.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Depends if it rains.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2011/01/13/1225987/385177-suncorp-stadium.jpg" alt="385177-suncorp-stadium.jpg"></p> -
The had exactly the same thing about 20 years ago. I remember Bull Allen doing his thing for the Canes. Think Cullen was injured at the time. I remember it being a pretty good concept. Not sure why it has been shelved for so long.<br><br>
The problem in Brisbane in February isn't the rain but the heat. -
10s in Brisbane in Feb? <br><br>
Pfffffft. That's not 10s! 10s is supposed to be played barefoot, at 8:00 am, in a frost. -
This post is deleted!
-
<p>Well no doubt the concept will work for the first year or two.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'd be interested in the details about who pays for the travel of such largish squads. Also if it's a WTG thing or if the teams have to guarantee some big names.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>From a coach's point of view it's a bit disrupting as it's not really a chance to sort combinations, lineout drills or really too much in terms of 15 a side tactics. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Pretty much just a chance at some team bonding and a cash grab as far as I can see</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="595918" data-time="1468240185">
<div>
<p>Well no doubt the concept will work for the first year or two.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'd be interested in the details about who pays for the travel of such largish squads. <strong>Also if it's a WTG thing or if the teams have to guarantee some big names.</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>From a coach's point of view it's a bit disrupting as it's not really a chance to sort combinations, lineout drills or really too much in terms of 15 a side tactics. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Pretty much just a chance at some team bonding and a cash grab as far as I can see</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Given the squad sizes will be 35-36 players, I doubt there is much room for the main players not to be there. Most of the big name players will have one maybe two hitouts for a half or so in a preseason game. With the financial incentives I think there will be genuine interest from the franchises to do well so will send quality</p> -
14 teams?
Sounds like a right balls up already.
How the hell does that even work? Do pool a and b just have to suck it up and play an extra game? Or do pool c & d have to randomly play one team in their pool twice?Either way, totally unbalanced and unfair.
Makes a bit of a mockery of the whole thing before it has even begun. -
you'd think they of had more than 14 wanting in, so there must be a reason for it surely, rather than oh shit 14 doesn't divide into 4 evenly
