Foster, Robertson etc
-
"Here’s the crux of the matter. Foster’s record does not stand up to scrutiny. He has won 67% of his tests – behind all of his predecessors in the professional era. John Hart won 76%, Wayne Smith (who quit in dismay) 71, John Mitchell (unceremoniously dumped after a 2003 World Cup semifinal exit) 82, Graham Henry 85 and Steve Hansen 87."
"Dig deeper and the picture is even gloomier. Foster has had a lot of creampuffs on his schedule. His record against fellow top-five teams – Ireland, France, South Africa and England – reads an abysmal three wins from seven."
"It appears the All Blacks coach wants his cake and to eat it, too. He was happy to be reappointed before his first two-year term was up, without consideration for other parties (the first of several mistakes made by NZR on this). Yet now he’s adamant the time must play out."
-
@KiwiMurph said in Foster, Robertson etc:
OPINION: Mark Robinson is wedged between a rock and a hard place now...Missed a trick there. Hinton could have written:
OPINION: Mark Robinson is wedged between a sook and a sad place now -
@kiwi_expat said in Foster, Robertson etc:
"Here’s the crux of the matter. Foster’s record does not stand up to scrutiny. He has won 67% of his tests – behind all of his predecessors in the professional era. John Hart won 76%, Wayne Smith (who quit in dismay) 71, John Mitchell (unceremoniously dumped after a 2003 World Cup semifinal exit) 82, Graham Henry 85 and Steve Hansen 87."
"Dig deeper and the picture is even gloomier. Foster has had a lot of creampuffs on his schedule. His record against fellow top-five teams – Ireland, France, South Africa and England – reads an abysmal three wins from seven."
"It appears the All Blacks coach wants his cake and to eat it, too. He was happy to be reappointed before his first two-year term was up, without consideration for other parties (the first of several mistakes made by NZR on this). Yet now he’s adamant the time must play out."
Finally someone in the media pointing out the obvious. Really this should have been said to his face, and then see how he reacts. But interviewers are normally facetious
-
@Machpants said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@kiwi_expat said in Foster, Robertson etc:
"Here’s the crux of the matter. Foster’s record does not stand up to scrutiny. He has won 67% of his tests – behind all of his predecessors in the professional era. John Hart won 76%, Wayne Smith (who quit in dismay) 71, John Mitchell (unceremoniously dumped after a 2003 World Cup semifinal exit) 82, Graham Henry 85 and Steve Hansen 87."
"Dig deeper and the picture is even gloomier. Foster has had a lot of creampuffs on his schedule. His record against fellow top-five teams – Ireland, France, South Africa and England – reads an abysmal three wins from seven."
"It appears the All Blacks coach wants his cake and to eat it, too. He was happy to be reappointed before his first two-year term was up, without consideration for other parties (the first of several mistakes made by NZR on this). Yet now he’s adamant the time must play out."
Finally someone in the media pointing out the obvious. Really this should have been said to his face, and then see how he reacts. But interviewers are normally facetious
lies, damn lies, and statistics though
John Hart's record looks great with the incredible team he was handed, and having Christian Fucking Cullen fall in his lap. 98 and 99 not so good. And guess what his record was against top 5 teams in those years? oh look a very similar 7 of 15
Smith's record against the top 5 teams isn't too much better at about 6 from 11
JMitch is the one who probably has the most to whinge about. A great record over all AND against the other top 5 sides he won 11 of 14
The Henry through Hanson era will never be replicated and shouldn't even be compared to (except by the first two years of Hart's reign)Add in Foster playing a far higher percentage of games outside of NZ and those numbers are going to get screwy.
Do i think he's doing a good job? no
But some of the shit that is getting thrown around at the moment is quite fucking ridiculous. He's going to the World Cup, and if a couple of things fall our way, we're as much of a chance as anyone to win it too -
@mariner4life said in Foster, Robertson etc:
John Hart's record looks great with the incredible team he was handed, and having Christian Fucking Cullen fall in his lap. 98 and 99 not so good. And guess what his record was against top 5 teams in those years? oh look a very similar 7 of 15
True. And the last time a coach really copped it for his efforts -- that very same Hart. He was not treated at all gracefully. Worse than anything Foster has got yet (although if we crap out at the Cup, then I imagine that will change).
Foster is in this trouble because he has been poor. Just as Hart got lots of flak when the losses started to mount.
(The win/loss statistics do hide one thing -- Hart lost very few test by a lot. Foster's losses have been of a very different nature. The ABs have always lost, but rarely been thrashed.)
-
@Chester-Draws and looked incapable of winning at times too.
Henry copped plenty post 2007 too...seems we haven't grown up that much?
-
'I've sat quiet and I've toed the line': Ian Foster doubles down on NZR call
Ian Foster has doubled down on his call for the announcement of the All Blacks coach beyond 2023 to be made following this year's World Cup.
When The Platform later asked if he felt he’d done the right thing by speaking out, Foster doubled down: “Absolutely. I’m not trying to do anything overtly clever here, I’m just trying to express what the All Blacks head coach thinks of what’s happening here at the moment.
“It’s about my team,” Foster said. “One of the All Blacks’ big rocks, values, call it whatever you like, that we have is that the team comes first and the decisions that we make is about the team and for me when I know that things are happening that are impacting on my group, my role is to poke my head up and I guess say what I think.
“I’ve sat quiet and I’ve toed the line listening to this conversation and debate and all my management is hearing is that other people are determining the timelines for what happens in this team.
-
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
'I've sat quiet and I've toed the line': Ian Foster doubles down on NZR call
Ian Foster has doubled down on his call for the announcement of the All Blacks coach beyond 2023 to be made following this year's World Cup.
When The Platform later asked if he felt he’d done the right thing by speaking out, Foster doubled down: “Absolutely. I’m not trying to do anything overtly clever here, I’m just trying to express what the All Blacks head coach thinks of what’s happening here at the moment.
I think he's trying to be clever, and failing. Again.
“It’s about my team,” Foster said. “One of the All Blacks’ big rocks, values, call it whatever you like, that we have is that the team comes first and the decisions that we make is about the team and for me when I know that things are happening that are impacting on my group, my role is to poke my head up and I guess say what I think.
“I’ve sat quiet and I’ve toed the line listening to this conversation and debate and all my management is hearing is that other people are determining the timelines for what happens in this team.
It's not your team, the ABs belong to NZ, and the team should come first, by picking the head coach to succeed you while we can get our choice. You've done quite enough damage to our team already
-
@canefan said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
'I've sat quiet and I've toed the line': Ian Foster doubles down on NZR call
Ian Foster has doubled down on his call for the announcement of the All Blacks coach beyond 2023 to be made following this year's World Cup.
When The Platform later asked if he felt he’d done the right thing by speaking out, Foster doubled down: “Absolutely. I’m not trying to do anything overtly clever here, I’m just trying to express what the All Blacks head coach thinks of what’s happening here at the moment.
I think he's trying to be clever, and failing. Again.
“It’s about my team,” Foster said. “One of the All Blacks’ big rocks, values, call it whatever you like, that we have is that the team comes first and the decisions that we make is about the team and for me when I know that things are happening that are impacting on my group, my role is to poke my head up and I guess say what I think.
“I’ve sat quiet and I’ve toed the line listening to this conversation and debate and all my management is hearing is that other people are determining the timelines for what happens in this team.
It's not your team, the ABs belong to NZ, and the team should come first, by picking the head coach to succeed you while we can get our choice. You've done quite enough damage to our team already
Not a good look by Foster in my opinion he has pushed the NZR to the wall on making some sort of decision,yep the his team comment makes me cringe.
Foster looks a bit desperate in my eyes. -
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Foster, Robertson etc:
What's revisionist is the claim that it was ever acceptable to lose games irrespective of against who or when. Doesn't matter if it's the RWC or the intervening years. It's ridiculous to claim that AB fans would have happily accepted one or the other.
I know of one AB fan.......
I don't care if Foster's ABs go on to win the RWC with the kind of dominance that would make the 87 lot jealous.
-
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
“It’s about my team,” Foster said.
No it's not. It's primarily about your future employment.
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
“One of the All Blacks’ big rocks, values, call it whatever you like, that we have is that the team comes first
That's right, which is why you are going to be replaced. Given that are such are team man, I am sure you have no problem with it. Wait!!!!! You are not just trying to protect your job are you?
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
all my management is hearing is that other people are determining the timelines for what happens in this team.
They are primarily determining the coaching setup.
Ian you are a jammy bugger who got saved by the adults coming in to help you. Looks like your luck may have run out. Suck it up like the good team man that you are.
-
@Frank said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
“It’s about my team,” Foster said.
No it's not. It's primarily about your future employment.
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
“One of the All Blacks’ big rocks, values, call it whatever you like, that we have is that the team comes first
That's right, which is why you are going to be replaced. Given that are such are team man, I am sure you have no problem with it. Wait!!!!! You are not just trying to protect your job are you?
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
all my management is hearing is that other people are determining the timelines for what happens in this team.
They are primarily determining the coaching setup.
Ian you are a jammy bugger who got saved by the adults coming in to help you. Looks like your luck may have run out. Suck it up like the good team man that you are.
Perfectly said,A lot of what I was thinking when I read and posted that .
-
-
Be kind of amusing if the delay is that they are about to pull an Australia and sack Foster with Robertson for this world cup cycle.
Ignoring my preference for coach, it would be nice to break the dogma of four year cycles of coaches is sacrosanct. If a coach is failing or under delivering that should be replaced when there is a better option.
-
@Kirwan said in Foster, Robertson etc:
Be kind of amusing if the delay is that they are about to pull an Australia and sack Foster with Robertson for this world cup cycle.
Ignoring my preference for coach, it would be nice to break the dogma of four year cycles of coaches is sacrosanct. If a coach is failing or under delivering that should be replaced when there is a better option.
Good points but should have done it after Ireland III or Bokke I. Very little time for a new coach to settle in now. Not even the Hawthorn Effect would likely be much use.
-
@Kirwan said in Foster, Robertson etc:
Be kind of amusing if the delay is that they are about to pull an Australia and sack Foster with Robertson for this world cup cycle.
Ignoring my preference for coach, it would be nice to break the dogma of four year cycles of coaches is sacrosanct. If a coach is failing or under delivering that should be replaced when there is a better option.
agree with the 2nd para 100%
Not sure i would be happy with the first, unless all we are changing is the head coach (and maybe defense, though even that is fraught with danger)
Australia are now in a position where an entirely new coaching group has 5 games to the World Cup to bed in their preferred patterns. That's a tough ask
At least England and Wales have a 6 nations campaign and i imagine a couple of warm up games, and probably a couple of camps.
While i know that the last 3 years means less to success at the World Cup than the next 8, that notion is predicated on some sort of continuity.
Stuff
