All Blacks vs Scotland
-
@Nepia said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
I expect the thread will acknowledge that and it wont just be vitriol at Foster.
@Nepia said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
SB had a good game.
you ok hun
-
@Bones said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Nepia said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
I expect the thread will acknowledge that and it wont just be vitriol at Foster.
@Nepia said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
SB had a good game.
you ok hun
Lol.
TBF, my main issue with SB is him getting Fern MOTM votes when he's clearly not the best on the field.
-
@NTA said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
Interesting game. Possession was king and both teams struggled a bit on defence with the pace of the opposition. Scotland had the advantage of playing together a bit more, but their last quarter was decidedly "meh".
Looked like they'd emptied the tank by about 60 minutes, having run the ABs ragged. I don't think it was their bench that lost them the game tho, as much as the inability to hold possession and give it to the big Saffer on the wing enough in the last 20.
Scots would be a bit unhappy with:
- the knock on called against DvdM which allowed the away side some much needed ball and territory. Looks like that was a call from Andrew Brace, who is not high on the list of quality referees. The other AR, but contrast, was a mute.
- The YC against Dempsey - might have been let go by another ref as a knock on in the tackle - certainly did his best to make it look like a tackle
- The penalty against WP Nel for boring in, late in the game. Bower folds in, drops his bind, and hits the deck. But yeah that was definitely Scotland's fault for angling in on their own ball
Overall tho, they didn't show enough ambition. You don't beat the ABs kicking penalties, and once they had a 6-point buffer they should have gone for the corner and tried to get another try. Overly conservative either from Townsend in the planning room, or Ritchie out on the field. Losing Watson early would have also sucked.
ABs got a bit of their own medicine in terms of defending a fast, accurate team. Similar to Japan I guess. The presence of ALB was good bar a little period either side of his yellow card, where he looked like he was knocking the rust off.
A bit of talk about Jordie at 12. Maybe that is where to go, because I watch Havili and never see much more than "workmanlike" in what he does. Back row had a great run at points, but didn't get much play as Scotland headed wide and the turnover opportunities dried up.
AB set piece did pretty well and the maul was strong both on attack and defence.
Starting halves didn't get much time with the ball, but the regular dinky crossfield kicks and chips are a black mark against Beaugan. Once he started running to the line and passing things looked better.
Mark Telea is fucking great to watch. The guy has sublime balance and footwork through contact. Wish he was an Aussie.
Frank Murphy looks like a jaded school teacher who only agreed to referee because the other guy didn't turn up. It was piss funny seeing him tell Papali'i "I've got to stand somewhere". Dalton should be well aware that using the ref as a blocker is an age-old tradition
Tony Johnson can bitch as much as he likes about "elbows on the ground" but the fact is most of the turnovers by both sides were purely about a lack of support players in the cleanout. He kept repeating it, like a mantra, until it became the truth in the very narrow gap between his eyes. He is the Ian Smith of rugby commentary, without the sense of humour.
Couple of things:
-
Was in stands and didn’t see Nel wrongful arrest. BUT earlier Scots got three points when Fagerson bored straight in and EDG hit the deck. So they had it coming.
-
When Bower came on and was making some hard yards the cleaning from Codie and Brewer [EDIT:Newell], and possibly Frizell or others, was immediate and effective. Made a huge difference. Once ABs started getting quick ball the haggis was well and truly cooked.
-
Richie Gray cited after all blacks game -
The Scotland lock will now attend an independent disciplinary hearing and could miss the final autumn Test, against Argentina at Murrayfield on Saturday. Gray is accused of breaching Law No 9.20(a) which states that a player must not charge into a ruck or maul. Charging includes any contact made without binding onto another player. -
@Daffy-Jaffy said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
Richie Gray cited after all blacks game -
The Scotland lock will now attend an independent disciplinary hearing and could miss the final autumn Test, against Argentina at Murrayfield on Saturday. Gray is accused of breaching Law No 9.20(a) which states that a player must not charge into a ruck or maul. Charging includes any contact made without binding onto another player.Just the one?
Saw a few of those and forgot them after the TMO said nothing
-
This post is deleted!
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Joans-Town-Jones said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Joans-Town-Jones said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Joans-Town-Jones said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@No-Quarter said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Joans-Town-Jones said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
Yeah this chopping and changing is such a great idea. Fucking change my mind.
Ma'a Nonu played something like 70 tests at 12 and 62 of those were with Conrad Smith. Jordie B has had 2 and looks a million times better than that headless chook Havili. We're 10 tests away from a QF but yeah, keep changing the fucking team.
Since 2015 we've been looking for centers. Hansen fucked the team around all the way up to the SF in 2019. Foster has done the same. Finally find a potential candidate and he won't be played 2 tests in succession.
For all the doom and gloom in this test, the Jocks are gifted a PT (DP was blocked from making a tackle and the ball ingoal makes a huge dogleg to the left, not probable in my book but hey) and Mr Indecisive gift wraps and pass right into the hands of the Jocks.
And what happens if we put all our eggs in the Jordie basket, he gets injured and we don't have back-ups with reasonable experience.?
You can say that about any number of players from every single team in the world. That's just the nature of the beast. This obsession NZ has with trying to have 2 players in every position with loads of test experience is absurd and is really hurting us as our top team rarely gets consecutive games together. We are just shooting ourselves in the foot with this while other teams build combinations.
Not really talking about having 2 players in every position, more about having a viable and reasonably seasoned option if a player gets injured - e.g.12. We don't currently have that and are running out of time to deliver it.
You want more time developing a backup than a starter? Fucking mindless.
It's not binary. Try actually reading what I wrote rather than throwing your toys out of the pam because I don't agree with you.
Its exactly what you said, pam.
You have to be seriously lacking in basic comprehension skills if you think my view that we need to develop Jordie and provide a reasonable backup option if Jordie gets injured, equates to me arguing for developing the backup option over Jordie as a starting 12.
Your literal argument is we need to develop backups for JB. How do we sufficiently do that without sacrificing JBs time at 12 in the next 10 tests? Again, we don't have 20-30 tests. We have 10. Perhaps you can't comprehend your own argument.
Well at least you've stopped putting words in my mouth.....
But yeah, time's short so let's give JB all the game time we can and make him play 80 minutes each game as there's zero risk he might get injured and he'll always be 100% fit and raring to go every Test until the end of RWC2023.
Sounds like a well thought out plan.
DC got injured in training. The both of them. Do you want them to stop training?
-
@NTA said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Bovidae said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
Taukei'aho has now scored 10 tries in 20 tests, the best strike rate for an All Black forward in history.
Oh yeah I forgot to mention him. Maybe I'm just used to the fact he's a total runaway train on attack. Fuck he's good
One of things I like is Samisoni's simple and direct approach, there aren't many delicate levers to go slightly askew. He goes forward or he doesn't!
-
@Bones said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@pakman said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
Brewer
nope, got nothing
Newell!!!
-
@Joans-Town-Jones said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Joans-Town-Jones said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Joans-Town-Jones said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Joans-Town-Jones said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@No-Quarter said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Joans-Town-Jones said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
Yeah this chopping and changing is such a great idea. Fucking change my mind.
Ma'a Nonu played something like 70 tests at 12 and 62 of those were with Conrad Smith. Jordie B has had 2 and looks a million times better than that headless chook Havili. We're 10 tests away from a QF but yeah, keep changing the fucking team.
Since 2015 we've been looking for centers. Hansen fucked the team around all the way up to the SF in 2019. Foster has done the same. Finally find a potential candidate and he won't be played 2 tests in succession.
For all the doom and gloom in this test, the Jocks are gifted a PT (DP was blocked from making a tackle and the ball ingoal makes a huge dogleg to the left, not probable in my book but hey) and Mr Indecisive gift wraps and pass right into the hands of the Jocks.
And what happens if we put all our eggs in the Jordie basket, he gets injured and we don't have back-ups with reasonable experience.?
You can say that about any number of players from every single team in the world. That's just the nature of the beast. This obsession NZ has with trying to have 2 players in every position with loads of test experience is absurd and is really hurting us as our top team rarely gets consecutive games together. We are just shooting ourselves in the foot with this while other teams build combinations.
Not really talking about having 2 players in every position, more about having a viable and reasonably seasoned option if a player gets injured - e.g.12. We don't currently have that and are running out of time to deliver it.
You want more time developing a backup than a starter? Fucking mindless.
It's not binary. Try actually reading what I wrote rather than throwing your toys out of the pam because I don't agree with you.
Its exactly what you said, pam.
You have to be seriously lacking in basic comprehension skills if you think my view that we need to develop Jordie and provide a reasonable backup option if Jordie gets injured, equates to me arguing for developing the backup option over Jordie as a starting 12.
Your literal argument is we need to develop backups for JB. How do we sufficiently do that without sacrificing JBs time at 12 in the next 10 tests? Again, we don't have 20-30 tests. We have 10. Perhaps you can't comprehend your own argument.
Well at least you've stopped putting words in my mouth.....
But yeah, time's short so let's give JB all the game time we can and make him play 80 minutes each game as there's zero risk he might get injured and he'll always be 100% fit and raring to go every Test until the end of RWC2023.
Sounds like a well thought out plan.
DC got injured in training. The both of them. Do you want them to stop training?
Are you now arguing that Jordie should play 80 minutes of every game until the end of the RWC, but to mitigate risk of a training injury, you don't want him to train?
-
@nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@NTA said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Bovidae said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
Taukei'aho has now scored 10 tries in 20 tests, the best strike rate for an All Black forward in history.
Oh yeah I forgot to mention him. Maybe I'm just used to the fact he's a total runaway train on attack. Fuck he's good
One of things I like is Samisoni's simple and direct approach, there aren't many delicate levers to go slightly askew. He goes forward or he doesn't!
I think the Foster Co op have handled him really well and am beginning to like the way they use him and Taylor. Starting Sami to soften up the opposition or bring him on later in the game for impact depending on the opponents. Helps that Taylor's game has improved no end as well.
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
am beginning to like the way they use him and Taylor
I'm not. They've only got it right once.
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Joans-Town-Jones said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Joans-Town-Jones said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Joans-Town-Jones said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Joans-Town-Jones said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@No-Quarter said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@Joans-Town-Jones said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
Yeah this chopping and changing is such a great idea. Fucking change my mind.
Ma'a Nonu played something like 70 tests at 12 and 62 of those were with Conrad Smith. Jordie B has had 2 and looks a million times better than that headless chook Havili. We're 10 tests away from a QF but yeah, keep changing the fucking team.
Since 2015 we've been looking for centers. Hansen fucked the team around all the way up to the SF in 2019. Foster has done the same. Finally find a potential candidate and he won't be played 2 tests in succession.
For all the doom and gloom in this test, the Jocks are gifted a PT (DP was blocked from making a tackle and the ball ingoal makes a huge dogleg to the left, not probable in my book but hey) and Mr Indecisive gift wraps and pass right into the hands of the Jocks.
And what happens if we put all our eggs in the Jordie basket, he gets injured and we don't have back-ups with reasonable experience.?
You can say that about any number of players from every single team in the world. That's just the nature of the beast. This obsession NZ has with trying to have 2 players in every position with loads of test experience is absurd and is really hurting us as our top team rarely gets consecutive games together. We are just shooting ourselves in the foot with this while other teams build combinations.
Not really talking about having 2 players in every position, more about having a viable and reasonably seasoned option if a player gets injured - e.g.12. We don't currently have that and are running out of time to deliver it.
You want more time developing a backup than a starter? Fucking mindless.
It's not binary. Try actually reading what I wrote rather than throwing your toys out of the pam because I don't agree with you.
Its exactly what you said, pam.
You have to be seriously lacking in basic comprehension skills if you think my view that we need to develop Jordie and provide a reasonable backup option if Jordie gets injured, equates to me arguing for developing the backup option over Jordie as a starting 12.
Your literal argument is we need to develop backups for JB. How do we sufficiently do that without sacrificing JBs time at 12 in the next 10 tests? Again, we don't have 20-30 tests. We have 10. Perhaps you can't comprehend your own argument.
Well at least you've stopped putting words in my mouth.....
But yeah, time's short so let's give JB all the game time we can and make him play 80 minutes each game as there's zero risk he might get injured and he'll always be 100% fit and raring to go every Test until the end of RWC2023.
Sounds like a well thought out plan.
DC got injured in training. The both of them. Do you want them to stop training?
Are you now arguing that Jordie should play 80 minutes of every game until the end of the RWC, but to mitigate risk of a training injury, you don't want him to train?
That's exactly what I'm arguing.
-
@African-Monkey said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
Hmmm a lot of negativity on here, having finally gotten round to watching the game, I see more positives than negatives.
I think personally we're heading in the right direction, sure, there were some below par performances, but at least we now have a clear idea on what our top side is now (unlike 2019), and for those saying we need to build depth, we have plenty of it imo.
Thought the forwards went well, with the clear standouts being Ardie, Papali'i and Scott Barrett. Whitelock put in his usual sold shift as did Taukeiaho and I know people keep moaning about a lack of 6, I think Akira and Frizzell are doing a good job. People need to get over the fact that we don't have anyone as dominant as Kaino anymore and need to make do with what we have. I prefer Frizzell starting with Akira off the bench but am happy with whatever the coaches decide on that one.
The backs were a bit rusty out there but at the same time, we know what our starting backline is going forward so on the positive side, at least the got a run together, so if they are needed, they can jump in next year if need be. We'll done to Telea on his two tries on debut and maybe it was reading this thread thinking that Clarke had an absolute disaster, and yes, I'm not saying he was great or anything, but I was expecting a lot worse.
The bench was brilliant it must be said, punishing a tiring Scottish team. Perenara, Taylor and Frizzell were especially good. Well done to Taylor who has copped plenty of criticism this year, and also Perenara, who has thrown his name in the hat for a recall next year.
I'm not saying we're the finished article, but I think as a team, we're slowly starting to understand Schmidt's gameplan a bit better and as I said earlier, at least we know what our starting side will look like. I'm still doubtful about McLeod's defensive system as just like the Japanese did, the Scots also managed to get around us with relative ease. I would have had him gone with Mooar and Plumtree personally as despite him being there for so long, we still manage to get beaten out wide as has happened all year. Our loosies have improved as a unit as the year has gone on, but we still look a bit lost in the backs, especially off line out ball where teams use the extra space to create mismatches. I put that down to McLeod personally, and its one of our big worries heading into world cup year imo.
Still, we got the win with a half strength side out there and showed a bit of character out there after getting outplayed for large periods of the game.
I get all that. But discipline for a Schmidt team was appalling. So many penalties. Won’t be winning big matches with those penalty stats.
I watch most games on French tv these days. I like the neutral commentary (except if France playing). They were fairly bemused about BBs incessant cross kicks
-
@Billy-Tell Yup, no arguments here, it does need to improve, and yes, that's why I'd start Mo'unga ahead of Barrett at 10 these days. I feel that the team plays better with Mo'unga there and plays to the gameplan better, where as Barrett is playing more eyes up footy off the cuff which isn't really helping the side.
Man for man, I'd probably say that Barrett is a better player (either way there's not much between them these days), but Mo'unga is more suited to what we need from our 10 under these coaches gameplan.
-
@African-Monkey I still think Beaudie is the best fullback in the squad. Sure his form has been a little up and down, but I like his pace and instincts when he has space.
Take that Havili intercept play, Beaudie ran a great fullbacks outside line and angle that gave himself space that would’ve put the defender in two minds had he got the ball when he should’ve.
It’s not to say he hasn’t played some great footy at 1st 5 in the past, but I think he’s still a great fullback that could/can play 1st 5 rather than the other way around.
-
@ACT-Crusader Yeah I'm happy with Barrett at the back too. He can pick and choose when he comes into the line and take the pressure off Mo'unga from there, which he was doing in the 2 outings this year. It didn't work in the past as he was trying to take over which made Mo'unga a passenger out there, but now that he's playing the role of a fullback, the team seems to run better.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks vs Scotland:
@African-Monkey I still think Beaudie is the best fullback in the squad. Sure his form has been a little up and down, but I like his pace and instincts when he has space.
Take that Havili intercept play, Beaudie ran a great fullbacks outside line and angle that gave himself space that would’ve put the defender in two minds had he got the ball when he should’ve.
It’s not to say he hasn’t played some great footy at 1st 5 in the past, but I think he’s still a great fullback that could/can play 1st 5 rather than the other way around.
DH did everything right, BB ran a great line, all up to the point of that ridiculous pass. It blows my mind that a simple draw and pass could be screwed so badly. Hell, even if DH was tackled he still could have got the offload going. BB is a great threat from broken play at the back. I'm concerned about his decisions under pressure whether to kick or run but yeah.
-
@Joans-Town-Jones i think he drifted too wide, if the outside defender keeps holding off the tackle then he should have straightened and forced the wide man to commit. if he doesn't then he had a chance to break the line...if he does you can make the pass to BB in space....holding and drifting caused the problems
