• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

SF Crusaders v Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
589 Posts 53 Posters 26.5k Views
SF Crusaders v Chiefs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • YeetyaahY Online
    YeetyaahY Online
    Yeetyaah
    replied to Nevorian on last edited by
    #523

    @Nevorian said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Did I just hear the Crusaders are going to Eden Park next week?

    Yeah they leaked the script

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • YeetyaahY Online
    YeetyaahY Online
    Yeetyaah
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #524

    @Crucial said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

    I also expect all those Saders posters that declared QT a cock last week to chime in on what a bigger cock Reece is

    One bashed his Mrs and the other didn't so speaks volumes

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to Dice on last edited by Canes4life
    #525

    @Dice Samisoni surely has that 2 locked up for the All Blacks. He just gets better and better.#beastmode

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #526

    Holy stink up the place chiefs. That was a stunning display of yuuuuck.

    Congratulations crusaders, tenacious stuff.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #527

    Looking at the game statistics, imagine the score line if Hall, Mo'unga and Jordan swapped with their counterparts.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #528

    @African-Monkey said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Chris Alright mate settle down haha your team won lol.

    He is a tool he should be no where near an AB jersey.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by Chris
    #529

    Big games from a Crusader viewpoint by Grace, Barrett and good work of the bench from McAlister,Newell,Williams and Strange

    Mounga,Jordan, Havilli were very good
    Ennor and Bridge good of the bench.

    Chiefs

    ST,
    Tao’Vai
    Vaa’i

    Were the best I thought

    broughieB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • FrankF Offline
    FrankF Offline
    Frank
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #530

    @antipodean said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Webber - be a leader and take responsibility. It is after all partly your fault.

    It's not the SJW way.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    wrote on last edited by
    #531

    Chiefs need a back 3 with higher work rate and game smarts next year. They pose almost no threat when ball gets kicked to them or passed out wide and rarely feature in kick chases. My feeling is that is why other teams can force so many errors on Chiefs attack and defence... because they don't have a strike player with anticipation and speed. So defenders only have to cover the options in the centre of the park.
    Must be gutting for the front row after their huge performance tonight.

    Canes4lifeC CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to ARHS on last edited by Canes4life
    #532

    @ARHS they need to get rid of Trask, Lowe and Tiatia, they are all very limited players. Getting McKenzie back will be huge.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to ARHS on last edited by
    #533

    @ARHS said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Chiefs need a back 3 with higher work rate and game smarts next year. They pose almost no threat when ball gets kicked to them or passed out wide and rarely feature in kick chases. My feeling is that is why other teams can force so many errors on Chiefs attack and defence... because they don't have a strike player with anticipation and speed. So defenders only have to cover the options in the centre of the park.
    Must be gutting for the front row after their huge performance tonight.

    We did know all of this at the start of the season. Going any further than we did depended on Ioane being the AB candidate he was once and for three of the back three options to play better than they ever had before.
    Glaring weaknesses right from the squad selection but there’s only so many of those guys in the game and we didn’t manage to get any of them.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #534

    Meh. Well done Sith.

    Great D.

    Dumb attack by Chiefies.

    Some calls early marginally in Sith's favour (QT YC could have gone penalty only, Matera could have gone Red ... btw second YC was straight red ... but little difference). And a couple of others I can't remember.

    What the FUCK was PGS doing when he did everything he could not to score? Fucking seriously.

    Otherwise hats off to the Saders.

    F KiwiPieK 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frye
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #535

    @booboo I think he was looking to pass infield to improve the angle. Incredibly poor decision.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to Frye on last edited by
    #536

    @Frye fucked

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #537

    @Crucial said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

    I also expect all those Saders posters that declared QT a cock last week to chime in on what a bigger cock Reece is

    No need. You won the argument last week - nothing wrong with a bit of niggle 😀

    But in all seriousness, it was a acknowledged last week that Reece can be a cock with the niggle too.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by gt12
    #538

    Expected result. Crusaders are going to Sade.

    Joane has been a bust and isn’t worth re-signing. I thought it was a good idea, but I was 100% wrong.

    Without Dmac back at 10, we’ll be fighting for 3rd best NZ team again next year. Gatland isn’t good enough to win Super rugby.

    Our back three is a fucking mess and needs a significant overhaul.

    I cant be fucked writing a long enough article for a year review but:

    • props are getting better although we might need a new TH
    • lock is a position of strength
    • loosies are useful but we rely on PGS not doing dumb things, hopefully Finau will continue to develop
    • halfback needs some decisions, Weber is no longer a running threat
    • first five needs Dmac then to develop Reihana or another option
    • midfield could be good, however QT looks average without ALB, losing Sullivan has proven to be a bad move, but hopefully Wrampling will develop.
    • wings are average, Lowe is our best but we need better quality, I’d move a few of them along
    • we need a quality fullback and a couple of players (apart from 10) who can help with the kicking game.

    I doubt we’ll cut loose the shit BOP outsides so if we get Dmac back we’ll likely stay the 3rd/4th best NZ side, so another semifinal exit would be a good achievement.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • FrankF Offline
    FrankF Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by
    #539

    QT does not look to be much more than a bash merchant with a not particularly good passing game.

    boobooB BonesB Victor MeldrewV 3 Replies Last reply
    5
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #540

    @Frank said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

    QT does not look to be much more than a bash merchant with a not particularly good passing game.

    And is he that great at bashing?

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #541

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by MiketheSnow
    #542

    Really hope that the SH dumbfuckery and dirty cuntery at the tackle continues in the June Tests.

    NH might have a chance.

    Reds are old school I believe. Down a man for the duration

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0

SF Crusaders v Chiefs
Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.