SF Crusaders v Chiefs
-
@Tim said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:
Only watched the second half, but the Chiefs have been dire. Jacobson was dominated by Valentini, and I guess he did nothing tonight.
He contributed to a forward performance that won an absolute gluttony of possession. Despite playing in a fairly unfamiliar position. And certainly not his fault if that possession was squandered at every post.
Jacobson was one of the Chief's best all season, without performers like him they would be nowhere near playoffs at all. Ridiculous that some suggest he won't make the All Blacks. Baby out with the bathwater stuff.
-
Webber - be a leader and take responsibility. It is after all partly your fault.
-
@Chris Alright mate settle down haha your team won lol.
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Machpants said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:
Fuck me that defence, ABs take notice please
Bridge & Havili were both outstanding....
Well they stood out
-
Did you guys have a different interview from the one I've got where Marshall's ex asked him the same question 3 times over and he said the Crusaders were good for the win, rued the fact the Chiefs didn't take their chances, and was clearly gutted at the loss.
-
-
Looking at the game statistics, imagine the score line if Hall, Mo'unga and Jordan swapped with their counterparts.
-
@African-Monkey said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:
@Chris Alright mate settle down haha your team won lol.
He is a tool he should be no where near an AB jersey.
-
-
@antipodean said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:
Webber - be a leader and take responsibility. It is after all partly your fault.
It's not the SJW way.
-
Chiefs need a back 3 with higher work rate and game smarts next year. They pose almost no threat when ball gets kicked to them or passed out wide and rarely feature in kick chases. My feeling is that is why other teams can force so many errors on Chiefs attack and defence... because they don't have a strike player with anticipation and speed. So defenders only have to cover the options in the centre of the park.
Must be gutting for the front row after their huge performance tonight. -
@ARHS said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:
Chiefs need a back 3 with higher work rate and game smarts next year. They pose almost no threat when ball gets kicked to them or passed out wide and rarely feature in kick chases. My feeling is that is why other teams can force so many errors on Chiefs attack and defence... because they don't have a strike player with anticipation and speed. So defenders only have to cover the options in the centre of the park.
Must be gutting for the front row after their huge performance tonight.We did know all of this at the start of the season. Going any further than we did depended on Ioane being the AB candidate he was once and for three of the back three options to play better than they ever had before.
Glaring weaknesses right from the squad selection but there’s only so many of those guys in the game and we didn’t manage to get any of them. -
Meh. Well done Sith.
Great D.
Dumb attack by Chiefies.
Some calls early marginally in Sith's favour (QT YC could have gone penalty only, Matera could have gone Red ... btw second YC was straight red ... but little difference). And a couple of others I can't remember.
What the FUCK was PGS doing when he did everything he could not to score? Fucking seriously.
Otherwise hats off to the Saders.
-
