• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Super Rugby 2022

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.6k Posts 77 Posters 188.4k Views
Super Rugby 2022
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #1182

    @booboo said in Hurricanes v Reds:

    I'm kind of worried that we rate ourselves (NZ teams) so highly and Aus teams so low.

    But I've said that before and results continue to be one sided.

    Just reminder.

    Pride comes before a fall.

    Think our teams have misunderestimated ( πŸ™‚ ) the Ockers.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #1183

    Further ... I'm thinking our top XVs are better than theirs (not unbeatably so, but all things being equal), but our depth or lack thereof due to Exodus, is being exposed.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    replied to Grooter on last edited by chimoaus
    #1184

    @FakatavaFuture said in Super Rugby 2022:

    @chimoaus the ward XV Moody, Coles, Isi tu'ungafasi, Selby Rickit, Strange, Frizell, Flanders, Iose, Nock, Ioane, Stevenson, ALB, Wrampling, Nanai Seturo, Love

    That team could challenge a few sides no doubt, seems the Chiefs have been hit hard in the backs.

    GrooterG 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • GrooterG Offline
    GrooterG Offline
    Grooter
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by Grooter
    #1185

    @chimoaus very true about the chiefs , also how did I forget Brodie and Brad two great magpies with chiefs mana currently out injured

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #1186

    @booboo said in Super Rugby 2022:

    Further ... I'm thinking our top XVs are better than theirs (not unbeatably so, but all things being equal), but our depth or lack thereof due to Exodus, is being exposed.

    fair.
    Losses had a few second stringers -- but let's see results in a few weeks Some of the depth doesn't look strong at all

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Grooter on last edited by
    #1187

    @FakatavaFuture said in Super Rugby 2022:

    @chimoaus very true about the chiefs , also how did I forget Brodie and Brad

    I was about to post about those 2 obvious omissions. πŸ™‚

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #1188

    @booboo said in Super Rugby 2022:

    @booboo said in Hurricanes v Reds:

    I'm kind of worried that we rate ourselves (NZ teams) so highly and Aus teams so low.

    But I've said that before and results continue to be one sided.

    Just reminder.

    Pride comes before a fall.

    Think our teams have misunderestimated ( πŸ™‚ ) the Ockers.

    Having said that am reading a fair bit if triumphalism in Strayan Rugby Twitter.

    I'd urge caution on both sides.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expat
    wrote on last edited by kiwi_expat
    #1189

    Fairly confident the final will be contested between the two teams starting with 'B' however home advantage will be key, I could potentially see the Brumbies pipping Blues in a close one if they're forced to travel to Canberra, McKellar's record at GIO stadium (and also against the NZ franchises) is impressive. Superior to any Aussie coach's record versus Kiwi teams since McKenzie & White.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #1190

    Call it arrogant if you will but I am not too concerned about NZ team performances over the last two weeks.
    We were deep into the comp after a diet of brutal derbies, Covid shuffles and short turnarounds with many niggles and injuries. The convict teams needed those home wins more than we did in many cases. What we needed was as many table points as we could muster while getting ready for the latter part of the RR and the finals.
    I think that the foot was slightly off the gas in many cases, saving fuel for the late laps.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #1191

    chimoausC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #1192

    @Tim That is a bummer for the Reds, such a powerful player. He will be lacking some match fitness come the July Internationals.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #1193

    The sideline commentator seemed to be downplaying the seriousness of Tupou's injury on Friday night.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #1194

    Were any judiciary hearings held last night?

    Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #1195

    Now official, with kick-off time (FJT = NZT):

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #1196

    @Bovidae said in Super Rugby 2022:

    Were any judiciary hearings held last night?

    Aren't they Tues night? I don't know but haven't seen anything.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by Bovidae
    #1197

    Hamish Dalzell gets 3 weeks.
    Ray Nu'u gets 4 weeks.

    On the news last night it was mentioned that Barrett is the latest to get a 1 week reduction. πŸ€·πŸ»β™‚

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/300579726/super-rugby-pacific-crusaders-lock-hamish-dalzell-banned-for-three-weeks

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by Stargazer
    #1198

    @Bovidae Yep, that was in Barrett's decision. It isn't in Nu'u's second one.

    For completeness, because it's not mentioned in the article. Samipeni Finau was issued a warning.

    "Having conducted a detailed review of all the available evidence, including all camera angles

    and additional evidence, including from the player and submissions from his legal representative,

    Aaron Lloyd, the Foul Play Review Committee found the foul play did not breach the red card

    threshold."

    "With respect to sanction the Foul Play Review Committee deemed the act of foul play merited a

    Warning as it was close to, but did not breach the red card threshold. The Foul Play Review

    Committee deemed that the significant mitigating factors, including the tackler having lowered his

    body height to effect the tackle, mitigated the sanction to a Warning."

    "The player is therefore free to resume playing.”

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #1199

    @Stargazer said in Super Rugby 2022:

    @Bovidae Yep, that was in Barrett's decision. It isn't in Nu'u's second one.

    For completeness, because it's not mentioned in the article. Samipeni Finau was issued a warning.

    "Having conducted a detailed review of all the available evidence, including all camera angles

    and additional evidence, including from the player and submissions from his legal representative,

    Aaron Lloyd, the Foul Play Review Committee found the foul play did not breach the red card

    threshold."

    "With respect to sanction the Foul Play Review Committee deemed the act of foul play merited a

    Warning as it was close to, but did not breach the red card threshold. The Foul Play Review

    Committee deemed that the significant mitigating factors, including the tackler having lowered his

    body height to effect the tackle, mitigated the sanction to a Warning."

    "The player is therefore free to resume playing.”

    So basically Jacobson was correct in querying the ref who had placed way to much emphasis on irrelevant factors. Saying that Finau’s situation was more dangerous than the earlier game decision because he (legally) came out of the defensive line was ridiculous.
    The refs have well prescribed guidelines for mitigating and exacerbating factors and doing your job is not in either.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    wrote on last edited by Winger
    #1200

    I don't know if the coaching are worse overall than in the past or not. But Holland seems to be struggling big time but Canes have had poor head coaches in the fairly recent past. And starting out. Boyd was VG but in part he was lucky to have Plumtree as an assistant.

    https://www.msn.com/en-nz/sports/other/new-zealand-s-teams-are-getting-worse-and-a-good-deal-of-that-is-down-to-coaching/ar-AAWTyUR?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=bf2a464334fa44f496e9ed7e42144e21

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #1201

    @Winger i don't completely disagree, we put players in too early...just because Lomu could play with men doesn't make everyone lomu and NZR is becoming more and more a closed shop, in every aspect, coaching, players, everything and everyone already in that shop talking up everyone else

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Super Rugby 2022
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.