• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks vs Springboks I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.9k Posts 92 Posters 222.2k Views
All Blacks vs Springboks I
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #1751

    I have no problem with the way the Boks play, and do not want to see all teams trying to play exactly the same game plan.

    This game was a great contrast in style, and it wasn't crap because of the Boks, it was crap because we just continued to drop the bloody ball leading to stoppage after stoppage which played into their hands. We just have to be a damn sight more accurate.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #1752

    @booboo said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @tim said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    A lot of scrum penalties against us when we are going marginally forward, this year. What's the story?

    Set piece rather poor tonight.

    Ref seemed to see our props after they'd been folded in by theirs.

    Suspect ref may be sitting in some uncomfortable reviews this week.

    My issue with ref (possibly already mentioned. I haven’t read through thread) was that he was compliant toward the Bok way of playing - every stoppage had him asking them to hurry up but he never enforced it. That’s Ok if he also allows us to play our style. He never made a quick mark for a penalty, blew up the advantage quickly without another infringement or even had a word about negative tactics throwing the ball away.
    Every team just wants the chance to play their game. He allowed the boks theirs but not us.
    When TJ called him out about them slowing the game at a penalty he even said “they aren’t slowing things down, I am”
    That’s just plainly unequal reffing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #1753

    @chimoaus if prior to set piece and a prop or hooker it doesn't make it as simple

    chimoausC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #1754

    Not sure about the subs, but actual realistic points. Unlike NZH all around 6 and 7

    Stuff
    S Rancid SchnitzelR antipodeanA 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by Rancid Schnitzel
    #1755

    @no-quarter said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    I have no problem with the way the Boks play, and do not want to see all teams trying to play exactly the same game plan.

    This game was a great contrast in style, and it wasn't crap because of the Boks, it was crap because we just continued to drop the bloody ball leading to stoppage after stoppage which played into their hands. We just have to be a damn sight more accurate.

    I have no problem with them playing that way because it makes them much more beatable. Shit we beat them yesterday and could barely string 3 phases together. They can be insanely good when they play proper rugby and the shit they can do can be downright scary at times. If they want to play within themselves and deliver this dross then so be it.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #1756

    @machpants biggest mystery is how Bridge got 4, probably about 3 more than i would have given him .
    Great to see Blackadder rate so high, thought he was one of our better forwards.
    If i had seen these ratings before knowing the score, i would have thought the worst …will take this result every day of the week and twice on Sunday ..
    And besides its 36 wins to the Boks, 4 x draws ,and 60 wins to the good guys , thats a decent win rate .

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #1757

    @machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    Not sure about the subs, but actual realistic points. Unlike NZH all around 6 and 7

    Stuff

    Yeah that was pretty spot on except for Jordan. He did some good things but farked up several times. Not Bridge bad but pretty farking close to it.

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Steven Harris on last edited by
    #1758

    @steven-harris said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @machpants biggest mystery is how Bridge got 4, probably about 3 more than i would have given him .
    Great to see Blackadder rate so high, thought he was one of our better forwards.
    If i had seen these ratings before knowing the score, i would have thought the worst …will take this result every day of the week and twice on Sunday ..
    And besides its 36 wins to the Boks, 4 x draws ,and 60 wins to the good guys , thats a decent win rate .

    The Boks had more wins prior to their isolation didn’t they ? Fair to say the ABs have done a bit better in th pro era.

    taniwharugbyT boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1759

    @mn5 was much closer pre professionalism, maybe a couple in it, but definitely struggled since then.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #1760

    @machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    Not sure about the subs, but actual realistic points. Unlike NZH all around 6 and 7

    Stuff

    LOL at those rankings. Rieko the same as Bridge?

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #1761

    This was from an article about the 100th test and rivalry between the teams.

    Up until 1981, the All Blacks had won just 15 of 37 (40.54 per cent), but post-apartheid, the difference is stark. The men in black have triumphed in 44 of 62 (70.97 per cent) since the teams reconvened in 1992.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • OomPBO Offline
    OomPBO Offline
    OomPB
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #1762

    @african-monkey we missed PSdT and Kolbey. Don't get better then them

    SmutsS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #1763

    @antipodean said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    Not sure about the subs, but actual realistic points. Unlike NZH all around 6 and 7

    Stuff

    LOL at those rankings. Rieko the same as Bridge?

    Watched the game on my phone in a noisy pub with a few beers under my belt. Can't say I noticed Rieko at all. Good or bad. Unfortunately I noticed Bridge.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #1764

    @taniwharugby said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @chimoaus if prior to set piece and a prop or hooker it doesn't make it as simple

    Yeah, makes it difficult, I 'don't know the answer but I hope they can figure it out. Are there any refs who call bullshit more than others?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #1765

    @rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @no-quarter said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    I have no problem with the way the Boks play, and do not want to see all teams trying to play exactly the same game plan.

    This game was a great contrast in style, and it wasn't crap because of the Boks, it was crap because we just continued to drop the bloody ball leading to stoppage after stoppage which played into their hands. We just have to be a damn sight more accurate.

    I have no problem with them playing that way because it makes them much more beatable. Shit we beat them yesterday and could barely string 3 phases together. They can be insanely good when they play proper rugby and the shit they can do can be downright scary at times. If they want to play within themselves and deliver this dross then so be it.

    You spelled passes wrong

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #1766

    @mn5 said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @steven-harris said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    @machpants biggest mystery is how Bridge got 4, probably about 3 more than i would have given him .
    Great to see Blackadder rate so high, thought he was one of our better forwards.
    If i had seen these ratings before knowing the score, i would have thought the worst …will take this result every day of the week and twice on Sunday ..
    And besides its 36 wins to the Boks, 4 x draws ,and 60 wins to the good guys , thats a decent win rate .

    The Boks had more wins prior to their isolation neutral referees didn’t they ? Fair to say the ABs have done a bit better in th pro era.

    FIFY

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by canefan
    #1767

    @taniwharugby said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    Another thing to show the ref had no feel for the game was how often he was in the way of players running or passing or they had to adjust what they were doing with him in thier line or peripheral.

    I said it during the game, he was a great lazy runner. I'm surprised he didn't get hit with a pass. Maybe that was how bad TJs pass was that he didn't hit him...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mantissanetM Offline
    mantissanetM Offline
    mantissanet
    wrote on last edited by
    #1768

    Congrats to ABs on the pretty tense win 👍🏻 Jordie really played very well. Blackadder was a pretty busy guy too. Siya Kwagga and Eben were great for us I thought and generally our forwards looked better than Oz games. Lots of errors both sides and neither team really got control going. Surprised it didn’t open up at least a bit in last 20 or so and automaton kicking right to the death was just weird…umm STUPID... Wonder what lineup changes we will have for last one… Surely there will be a lot now and hopefully a very different game awaits …🤞🏻

    ACT CrusaderA boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to mantissanet on last edited by
    #1769

    @mantissanet I think they should start Jantjies and give Pollard a rest.

    broughieB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to mantissanet on last edited by
    #1770

    @mantissanet said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:

    Congrats to ABs on the pretty tense win 👍🏻 Jordie really played very well. Blackadder was a pretty busy guy too. Siya Kwagga and Eben were great for us I thought and generally our forwards looked better than Oz games. Lots of errors both sides and neither team really got control going. Surprised it didn’t open up at least a bit in last 20 or so and automaton kicking right to the death was just weird…umm STUPID... Wonder what lineup changes we will have for last one… Surely there will be a lot now and hopefully a very different game awaits …🤞🏻

    Didn't mind seeing him dragged.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

All Blacks vs Springboks I
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.