Waratahs v Highlanders

hydro11

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Bones" data-cid="565707" data-time="1458332132">
<div>
Just watched the game. What that fuck was that last try to the tahs? How on earth did the TMO see a try there? And why was the ref rushing the Highlanders on the last couple of penalties?
 
Anyway, great to watch, Highlanders just so technically accurate for the most part. Sopoaga just keeps getting better and better, really impressive tonight - especially in defence. Put in quite a few important tackles and got into good positions.
 
Thompson looked handy, did a very good job, as did Tongia.
 
Bloody handy loosies this year too, not missing Nasty or Hardie at all.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Highlanders were clearly time wasting. I think they were lucky to get a warning.

Bones

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hydro11" data-cid="565710" data-time="1458334491">Highlanders were clearly time wasting. I think they were lucky to get a warning.</blockquote>
Yeah...nah. Compare that to any other penalty throughout the match. Clearly not time time wasting.

Siam

Yep.The ref seemed to be influenced by the crowd and match situation. 
Threatening to reverse penalties is bollocks. Far better to stop the clock. Fundamentally you can't referee the last 5 minutes differently to the first 5. Similarly when Landers shut up shop and had advantage one of the tahs commited a most blatant professional foul to force the penaltywith sole intention of getting a lineout. Apparently according to laws professional fouls are cardable 
Blaming a ref for a loss might be not on but critiquing his performance is a must.

Frank

I wonder if the Highlanders were to win the title again would Joseph go ahead of Rennie in the pecking order.
 
Regardless, it would be great to see him in the AB set-up .
Role - Hard-Ass Forwards Coach.

pukunui

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Bones" data-cid="565685" data-time="1458311385">
<div>
Who knows - but he's not been injured out of a side yet huh. I'd prefer him there for 60-70 than not at all.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
So which is it? To give the 3rd choice some experience, he can't go 80 or that he is apparently injury prone in the last 10 mins? All seem pretty far fetched to me when that thinking is only applied to him.
Looks more like a preconceived tactical change to IMO but i can't see what the benefit is.

Crash

No doubt the Highlanders have something, I'll be damned if I know what it is - taking a team of relative unknowns i.e. Thmpson, Faddes and Tongia, (when their first-stringers are out injured) and walking away with the spoils when you think of some of the names in the Tahs - Hoopah,Beale, Mumm, Folau, Skelton Phipps, Dennis - these rare all regular Wallabies.

Smudge

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Frank" data-cid="565723" data-time="1458347205">
<div>
I wonder if the Highlanders were to win the title again would Joseph go ahead of Rennie in the pecking order.
 
Regardless, it would be great to see him in the AB set-up .
Role - Hard-Ass Forwards Coach.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
He's already signed to take over the Japan national team at the end of the year. So, no, he won't be going ahead of Rennie.

hydro11

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="565720" data-time="1458345434">
<div>
Yep.The ref seemed to be influenced by the crowd and match situation. 
Threatening to reverse penalties is bollocks. Far better to stop the clock. Fundamentally you can't referee the last 5 minutes differently to the first 5. Similarly when Landers shut up shop and had advantage one of the tahs commited a most blatant professional foul to force the penaltywith sole intention of getting a lineout. Apparently according to laws professional fouls are cardable 
Blaming a ref for a loss might be not on but critiquing his performance is a must.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="565720" data-time="1458345434">
<div>
Yep.The ref seemed to be influenced by the crowd and match situation. 
Threatening to reverse penalties is bollocks. Far better to stop the clock. Fundamentally you can't referee the last 5 minutes differently to the first 5. Similarly when Landers shut up shop and had advantage one of the tahs commited a most blatant professional foul to force the penaltywith sole intention of getting a lineout. Apparently according to laws professional fouls are cardable 
Blaming a ref for a loss might be not on but critiquing his performance is a must.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
How does conceding a penalty force a lineout? If the line out was in the best interest of the Waratahs then the Highlanders should have kicked the ball into touch.

Siam

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hydro11" data-cid="565761" data-time="1458368460">
<div>
How does conceding a penalty force a lineout? If the line out was in the best interest of the Waratahs then the Highlanders should have kicked the ball into touch.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Did you see what the Highlanders were doing? Did you see about 4 minutes of pick and go for zero field advancement? They retained possession through 2 penalty advantages
 
The Highlanders didn't want a lineout even with their throw. The Tahs only option was to have a lineout with a Landers throw to try and steal it. Hooper deliberately conceded a penalty to get the ref to blow his whistle.
 
I'd imagine the very short discussion the Highlanders got ridiculously threatened for was whether to tap and keep picking and going or risk a lineout.
 
 
Your second sentence makes no sense

Rancid Schnitzel

Just watched a replay. I understand the furore here. Some of those calls were appalling. 
Was wondering about that one with Phipps right on the line when it was ruled that the tacklers didn't realise. Wasn't Phipps still on his feet and pushing forward?

Glath

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Rancid Schnitzel" data-cid="565790" data-time="1458374054">
<div>
Just watched a replay. I understand the furore here. Some of those calls were appalling. 
Was wondering about that one with Phipps right on the line when it was ruled that the tacklers didn't realise. Wasn't Phipps still on his feet and pushing forward?
</div>
</blockquote>
Yep. He was.

Bones

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="pukunui" data-cid="565733" data-time="1458352464">
<div>
So which is it? To give the 3rd choice some experience, he can't go 80 or that he is apparently injury prone in the last 10 mins? All seem pretty far fetched to me when that thinking is only applied to him.
Looks more like a preconceived tactical change to IMO but i can't see what the benefit is.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Hah, now it has to be one definite reason? Only one? Gosh, who knew.
 
Ok I give up, you're right. Joseph is doing it because he's an idiot with no idea, there's no benefit at all.
 
However, I was expecting to see Parker take a shit on the field after your complaining. Turns out he actually went ok, apart from being held up in the tackle once. Go figure.

hydro11

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="565770" data-time="1458370781">
<div>
Did you see what the Highlanders were doing? Did you see about 4 minutes of pick and go for zero field advancement? They retained possession through 2 penalty advantages
 
The Highlanders didn't want a lineout even with their throw. The Tahs only option was to have a lineout with a Landers throw to try and steal it. Hoopah deliberately conceded a penalty to get the ref to blow his whistle.
 
I'd imagine the very short discussion the Highlanders got ridiculously threatened for was whether to tap and keep picking and going or risk a lineout.
 
 
Your second sentence makes no sense
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Sorry the second sentence should have read "should not have." Again, if it was so obvious that going for the lineout was a poor option, the Highlanders should not have done it. I half agree with respect to Hooper. He conceded the penalty not to force a lineout throw but to just end the advantage. Hooper is a great fetcher - he could have stolen the ball or a penalty could have been conceded.

pukunui

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Bones" data-cid="565809" data-time="1458377080">
Hah, now it has to be one definite reason? Only one? Gosh, who knew. 
Ok I give up, you're right. Joseph is doing it because he's an idiot with no idea, there's no benefit at all. 
However, I was expecting to see Parker take a shit on the field after your complaining. Turns out he actually went ok, apart from being held up in the tackle once. Go figure.</blockquote>
 
No i just think you are pulling reasons out of your arse. Then changing your mind. Never said he played badly just that i don't see the reason for consistantly dragging one of your best players. Really was a harmless query but it seems to have got up your nose. Will leave it there.

Bones

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="pukunui" data-cid="565898" data-time="1458387287">No i just think you are pulling reasons out of your arse. Then changing your mind. Never said he played badly just that i don't see the reason for consistantly dragging one of your best players. Really was a harmless query but it seems to have got up your nose. Will leave it there.</blockquote>
Haaaa yes those are completely made up reasons that no coach would ever think of for making subs. I provided you with harmless hints as to what the thinking may be, if you can't accept logical thinking I guess you'll just have to stick with Joseph having no idea.

Siam

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hydro11" data-cid="565891" data-time="1458384998">
<div>
Sorry the second sentence should have read "should not have." Again, if it was so obvious that going for the lineout was a poor option, the Highlanders should not have done it. I half agree with respect to Hoopah. He conceded the penalty not to force a lineout throw but to just end the advantage. Hoopah is a great fetcher - he could have stolen the ball or a penalty could have been conceded.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
What? Did you see it? 
 
The highlanders neither wanted to stop play or go for a lineout. They were quite happy eating up the clock till the siren went. The expertise of the Landers pick and go made it abundantly clear that the Tahs were very unlikely to regain the ball.
 
Hoopah knew this, so he deliberately disrupted play to get the ref to blow his whistle thus causing a restart. The ref then hounded and demanded the Landers get on with it so they kicked the ball out, (they didn't particularly want a lineout, they'd have preferred to keep picking and going), but that bloody whistle means you have to stop playing :idiot2: .
 
Hoopah sucked the ref in and the Highlanders decided they'd win the game by winning the last lineout. They had to act quick or else dickhead was going to reverse the penalty
 
How hard is this to grasp? Other options for the Highlanders were a scrum or tap kick (which they didn't really have time to organise thanks to a rattled ref).

NTA

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote">Never in the 134-year history of NSW rugby, established in 1882, has a reserve player come on in a first grade clash and scored three tries.
Astonishingly, Holloway managed this feat in just 16 minutes on Friday for the Waratahs against defending Super Rugby champions the Highlanders.
In a stark contrast of the present and future, backrower Holloway replaced veteran Wycliff Palu in the 56th minute, and scored within 60 seconds with his second touch.
He crossed again the 65th and 72nd minutes to rack up an incredible hat-trick</blockquote>

The Silver Fern

Waratahs v Highlanders