The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread
-
@Chris said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Bones said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Chris said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Bones said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Chris said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
So I can’t judge how we are tracking under Foster with what we are playing against.
That doesn't make any sense at all. If we were losing horribly would you say the same? If no new talent was being blooded would you say the same? It'll be a pretty funny stance to reflect on if Aus manage to beat those teams when they next play.
That’s a big If
Why?
Something also worth taking note of...
, to show that we are ready for that when we do get to play those teams. It's not like England are going to change how they play in a year.
Don't get the "but it was last year" posts.
-
@Kirwan said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
Your basic point is right. We are great front runners, and struggle when matched up front by teams that don't play much.
but laying that at Foster's feet is a touch disingenuous because we've been like that for a long, long time. Slow the ball, limit turnovers, kick the ball out have been the keys to beating us for ages. We have, for a long time, played a simple game that is holding the opposition, then punishing the fuck out of errors (mainly bad kicks).
We don't pick teams apart with clever ball movement. We don't roll teams in the tight in a field position game and accumulate points. We rely on ruthlessly exploiting the opportunities that come from opposition errors, and a defensive system that keeps the opposition to 20 points or less. That's AB rugby.
-
@Kirwan said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Chris said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Bones said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Chris said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Bones said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Chris said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
So I can’t judge how we are tracking under Foster with what we are playing against.
That doesn't make any sense at all. If we were losing horribly would you say the same? If no new talent was being blooded would you say the same? It'll be a pretty funny stance to reflect on if Aus manage to beat those teams when they next play.
That’s a big If
Why?
Something also worth taking note of...
, to show that we are ready for that when we do get to play those teams. It's not like England are going to change how they play in a year.
Don't get the "but it was last year" posts.
Yeah thanks @Kirwan Exactly
-
@mariner4life said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Kirwan said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
Your basic point is right. We are great front runners, and struggle when matched up front by teams that don't play much.
but laying that at Foster's feet is a touch disingenuous because we've been like that for a long, long time. Slow the ball, limit turnovers, kick the ball out have been the keys to beating us for ages. We have, for a long time, played a simple game that is holding the opposition, then punishing the fuck out of errors (mainly bad kicks).
We don't pick teams apart with clever ball movement. We don't roll teams in the tight in a field position game and accumulate points. We rely on ruthlessly exploiting the opportunities that come from opposition errors, and a defensive system that keeps the opposition to 20 points or less. That's AB rugby.
And that predates Hansen
-
@ACT-Crusader said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@mariner4life said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Kirwan said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
Your basic point is right. We are great front runners, and struggle when matched up front by teams that don't play much.
but laying that at Foster's feet is a touch disingenuous because we've been like that for a long, long time. Slow the ball, limit turnovers, kick the ball out have been the keys to beating us for ages. We have, for a long time, played a simple game that is holding the opposition, then punishing the fuck out of errors (mainly bad kicks).
We don't pick teams apart with clever ball movement. We don't roll teams in the tight in a field position game and accumulate points. We rely on ruthlessly exploiting the opportunities that come from opposition errors, and a defensive system that keeps the opposition to 20 points or less. That's AB rugby.
And that predates Hansen
yes it does. It predates Ted as well.
-
I have fond memories of when NZ held SA to nil in Cape Town on 16 August 2008.
-
@mariner4life said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@ACT-Crusader said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@mariner4life said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Kirwan said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
Your basic point is right. We are great front runners, and struggle when matched up front by teams that don't play much.
but laying that at Foster's feet is a touch disingenuous because we've been like that for a long, long time. Slow the ball, limit turnovers, kick the ball out have been the keys to beating us for ages. We have, for a long time, played a simple game that is holding the opposition, then punishing the fuck out of errors (mainly bad kicks).
We don't pick teams apart with clever ball movement. We don't roll teams in the tight in a field position game and accumulate points. We rely on ruthlessly exploiting the opportunities that come from opposition errors, and a defensive system that keeps the opposition to 20 points or less. That's AB rugby.
And that predates Hansen
yes it does. It predates Ted as well.
So I guess my point is the fix is long overdue? Wasn't Plumtree supposed to add "starch" to the forward pack to fix that?
That was the PR when he was appointed
-
-
@Tim said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
I have fond memories of when NZ held SA to nil in Cape Town on 16 August 2008.
I remember there was a bit of angst going into that match after the Boks beat us in Dunners a few weeks earlier.
But McCaw being back for this match gave us a bit of hope.
There was a bit of ‘outrage’ too going into the Dunners test - Rodders at openside, the Wulf selection, Sivi moved to the right wing, Ellis and O’Neill selections, Afoa starting.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
But McCaw being back for this match gave us a bit of hope
how many times has this been written? what a player. The Greatest All Black
-
@ACT-Crusader Carter missing four in a row in the first half was not expected in the Cape Town test.
-
@Tim said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@ACT-Crusader Carter missing four in a row in the first half was not expected in the Cape Town test.
Left his kicking boots at the hotel with Suzie 😉
It was a game that we just smothered the Boks and took our opportunities. A stark contrast to both the Sydney and Dunners tests.
I guess that’s the test that lies ahead for Foster, the ABs will get outplayed and even lose (or draw) matches - shock horror - but it’s how we respond and change things up which is what will help bring the lynch mob along.
-
@Kirwan said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@mariner4life said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@ACT-Crusader said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@mariner4life said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Kirwan said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
Your basic point is right. We are great front runners, and struggle when matched up front by teams that don't play much.
but laying that at Foster's feet is a touch disingenuous because we've been like that for a long, long time. Slow the ball, limit turnovers, kick the ball out have been the keys to beating us for ages. We have, for a long time, played a simple game that is holding the opposition, then punishing the fuck out of errors (mainly bad kicks).
We don't pick teams apart with clever ball movement. We don't roll teams in the tight in a field position game and accumulate points. We rely on ruthlessly exploiting the opportunities that come from opposition errors, and a defensive system that keeps the opposition to 20 points or less. That's AB rugby.
And that predates Hansen
yes it does. It predates Ted as well.
So I guess my point is the fix is long overdue? Wasn't Plumtree supposed to add "starch" to the forward pack to fix that?
That was the PR when he was appointed
Yeah exactly, I don't think anyone was saying we move away from exploiting turnover ball, that is largely in our DNA and a good point well made. More of been able to play a different game plan, even using it just as effectively if and when required, including
changing within a game if needed.I don't see Foster as yet showing any change, unless he of course he thinks he needs different players versus different opposition. To early to tell and jury still out.
-
@Rapido said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Bones said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Chris said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@ACT-Crusader said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
All fine that you don’t have confidence in Foster but pumping up the Boks and Poms when they aren’t playing any test rugby and they are going through transitions themselves, is a little presumptive
I don’t think so You only have to look at last year that was not that far ago.And where SA and England can be again I don’t see we have progressed much from the end of Hansen’s area looks kind of the same to me.
I am looking forward to 2023 are you saying SA and England will be shit then not as shit as we might be if we don’t change the coach
How many tests have they won in 2020? Who are their shining lights as players in 2020?
England have won 3 x as many games as nz this year .
They've also lost infinitely many more times than NZ.
Lies, damned lies and statistics
-
@bayimports said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Kirwan said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@mariner4life said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@ACT-Crusader said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@mariner4life said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@Kirwan said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
Your basic point is right. We are great front runners, and struggle when matched up front by teams that don't play much.
but laying that at Foster's feet is a touch disingenuous because we've been like that for a long, long time. Slow the ball, limit turnovers, kick the ball out have been the keys to beating us for ages. We have, for a long time, played a simple game that is holding the opposition, then punishing the fuck out of errors (mainly bad kicks).
We don't pick teams apart with clever ball movement. We don't roll teams in the tight in a field position game and accumulate points. We rely on ruthlessly exploiting the opportunities that come from opposition errors, and a defensive system that keeps the opposition to 20 points or less. That's AB rugby.
And that predates Hansen
yes it does. It predates Ted as well.
So I guess my point is the fix is long overdue? Wasn't Plumtree supposed to add "starch" to the forward pack to fix that?
That was the PR when he was appointed
Yeah exactly, I don't think anyone was saying we move away from exploiting turnover ball, that is largely in our DNA and a good point well made. More of been able to play a different game plan, even using it just as effectively if and when required, including
changing within a game if needed.I don't see Foster as yet showing any change, unless he of course he thinks he needs different players versus different opposition. To early to tell and jury still out.
There aren't many international teams out there who have a reliable "plan b" that they execute as well as the "plan A". All top level teams start to struggle if you take their preferred game away from them.
-
@mariner4life True, I don't deny that, but the ABs aren't every team and in that essence I don't think we should settle for mediocrity, if that is a failure of most teams then that for me should be a goal we solve first. Have everyone chasing us, not the other way round.
Yes I'm an idealist
-
@bayimports said in The 'How is Fozzie going?' thread:
@mariner4life True, I don't deny that, but the ABs aren't every team and in that essence I don't think we should settle for mediocrity, if that is a failure of most teams then that for me should be a goal we solve first. Have everyone chasing us, not the other way round.
Yes I'm an idealist
Totally agree why cant we lead the pack and be one step ahead of everyone.
https://www.espn.co.uk/rugby/report?gameId=25710&league=244293
