• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
rwcjapanspringboks
495 Posts 62 Posters 23.0k Views
RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rebound
    wrote on last edited by
    #369

    So a tackle around the ball is high

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Rebound on last edited by
    #370

    @Rebound Headgear grab.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #371

    So Colby flips a Japanese player over the horizontal and....

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    wrote on last edited by Anonymous
    #372

    So the ball carrier is allowed to lift defenders over their shoulders and drop them?

    R TimT 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #373

    @Tim said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    @Rebound Headgear grab.

    Barely touched it. The player was reacting to the player landing on his ankle

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rebound
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #374

    @Anonymous and get as penalty for hurting himself

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #375

    @Anonymous Don't go high.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #376

    @ACT-Crusader said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    So Colby flips a Japanese player over the horizontal and....

    And no one seems to be asking them to provide a urine sample...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    wrote on last edited by
    #377

    It seems it's not considered as he is not a tackler.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #378

    That. Is. Gorgeous.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #379

    What a massive maul. That’s a good note for me to bow out. Boks finally did something good.

    Great effort Japan.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #380

    Mauls are a blight on the game when players join in front of the ball carrier.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Magpie_in_ausM Offline
    Magpie_in_ausM Offline
    Magpie_in_aus
    wrote on last edited by
    #381

    Is that not obstruction when you roll the maul into no one?

    R canefanC ACT CrusaderA 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rebound
    replied to Magpie_in_aus on last edited by
    #382

    @Magpie_in_aus exactly should be a penalty to Japan

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #383

    Final score? I reckon about 31 -3.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #384

    @ACT-Crusader said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    Mauls are a blight on the game when players join in front of the ball carrier.

    If only there was a law against that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Magpie_in_aus on last edited by
    #385

    @Magpie_in_aus said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    Is that not obstruction when you roll the maul into no one?

    That's truck and trailer isn't it?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by
    #386

    Japan too tired and too small.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Magpie_in_aus on last edited by
    #387

    @Magpie_in_aus said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    Is that not obstruction when you roll the maul into no one?

    Two Bok players rush in and join the side of the maul to drive. Last time I checked the laws any player that joins a maul needs to do so from the back.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to Rebound on last edited by
    #388

    @Rebound said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    @Magpie_in_aus exactly should be a penalty to Japan

    Think it’s still the original maul so no obstruction

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    1

RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4)
Rugby Matches
rwcjapanspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.