TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)
-
@Chris-B still not really giving any insights into what they are looking to achieve (as in RM-10, BB-15..1 off experiment vs our old foe, or a nod to the future...)
Sure the 1st test v Aus might show us where they are looking in terms of personell, but what about the game plan, and if they give a hint of thier best 15 v Aus, we then have a 2nd test v Aus and a test v Tonga to fine tune before meeting SA again...time is against us.
While I thnk they are still fine tuning, time is against us.
-
@taniwharugby said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
time is against us.
I guess that is the problem with our draw at the RWC. One of our most important matches is the first one. We can't build into it like the cricket.
-
Patty T has the potential to be a great ball carrying lock who could give us real go-forward and smash other forwards backwards.
He has shown glimpses of his destructive potential at test level - 2nd half against England in the rain a few years back and in the last part of the thriller we won in Brisbane.
He too often seems ponderous though. Shame, we really need a big grunter in the pack, particularly considering our starting props, Whitelock and Read are not destructive ball runners at all.
-
@taniwharugby It's all a bit of guesswork, but I'm expecting to see Beaudy start at 10 for the first game vs Oz and Richie start the second (probably Beauden at 15).
If they're taking Josh Ioane to Japan then he'll probably only get time off the bench - maybe only against Samoa (maybe in Bled II).
I don't think we (or the Jaapies) will know who is our starting first five until the final Thursday. Won't actually be the end of the world (cup) if we lose that one.
Then we've got three games to do some more fine-tuning. Remember, last time we were still ringing the death-knell of our chances when we looked pretty shit against Georgia and Tonga, so I'm not panicking about anything just yet - except Retallick's shoulder.
-
@Frank said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Patty T has the potential to be a great ball carrying lock who could give us real go-forward and smash other forwards backwards.
He has shown glimpses of his destructive potential at test level - 2nd half against England in the rain a few years back and in the last part of the thriller we won in Brisbane.
In gerenal he's a player that takes a few games to get into form. He's not a player that immediately plays well after a few weeks off.
-
@Chris-B I'm not really panicking either, I am just struggling to see the bigger picture, unlike other years where at least I could sorta see what they were trying for.
Yeah losing to the Bokke in the opening game wont be the end, but will be our first pool loss ever, and doesnt bode well...
What worries me though, is our combinations, or lack thereof, clear to see vs Argentina and last night we have no combinations or cohesion, given we are likely to see more changes v Aus, it wont help that.
Taylor v Coles - this is almost a coin toss, guess you could say Coles is making the impact off the bench, but we know he can start
Props - MOody I think is safe, but FRanks effectiveness outside the scrum is starting to show (More)
Locks - no BBBR, has to be Scott, but its probably BBBRs grunt at scrumtime we wil miss most, I dont think he has been near his best elsewhere in BLack for a while now.
Loosies - IMO, the best 3 is clear (even if you think Read is out of form, he is still the best 8, or 6 if you pushed him there to accomodate Savea at 8 )
AS v TJP - reckon AS edge TJ last night, which is telling given TJ is supposed to be superior in the physicality and SA were certainly that.
RM v BB - well, it woudl seem clear BB will return
Midfield -
Back 3 - very interesting, Reiko not in very good form, BB an option, BFA not back to best...then?So IMO, we will have 1 change at lock (garanteed) 2 changes in the loose, halfback, 1st 5, I expect 1 in the mid-field, and 1 in the back 3...so by my count that will be 7 changes from last nights match that will push us close to our 1st 15.
-
@nzzp said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@No-Quarter said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Right now Beauden is clearly our best 10 and 15.
If we play him at 15, we have to start a rookie at 10.
If we play him at 10, we start one of our most experienced players at 15.
... and our experienced 15 is coming back from a leg injury. Fitness and pace will come back as he gets more training time.
Jeepers, how many times do you have to see that not happen before you stop believing? Old guys just don't get their pace back during a season. At best he might over a long off-season get a tiny bit of it back, but between now and the Cup there is no chance he is going to get faster.
-
@Chester-Draws said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@nzzp said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@No-Quarter said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Right now Beauden is clearly our best 10 and 15.
If we play him at 15, we have to start a rookie at 10.
If we play him at 10, we start one of our most experienced players at 15.
... and our experienced 15 is coming back from a leg injury. Fitness and pace will come back as he gets more training time.
Jeepers, how many times do you have to see that not happen before you stop believing? Old guys just don't get their pace back during a season.
I agree- but this is coming off an injury, so I'm hopeful.
-
@taniwharugby Don't think we should worry in the slightest about the lack of cohesion - someone like Rieko probably hasn't played a game since the Blues got knocked out - maybe some club rugby? Even the Crusaders boys hadn't played for three weeks and were playing in new systems and new combinations.
I think it's barely worth questioning people like Read (especially), Franks and Ben Smith - if they're fit, they'll be playing - they're McCaw, Woodcock and Conrad Smith from 2015. Hansen loves experience and he's shown it over and over. When push comes to shove, he'll probably revert to Beauden at 10, even if he perhaps shouldn't (and we may all be on the Mo'unga bandwagon again a few weeks from now).
We discussed last year that - man for man - the current team simply isn't as good as the 2015 one. But, it is still good enough to win the RWC if it plays to its potential - though that might not be true without Retallick. He is the last person I wanted to lose.
-
@Chris-B but we dont really have a McCaw, DC, Nonu or Conrad from 2015...
anyways, stop it, you are making me sound like I think its all doom and gloom!
I know they are pretty good at getting the boys firing at the right time, but to me at least in 2015 there were stil signs they were on the right path, right now, I think they are lost, and struggling to find the path...
-
-
@Chris-B Yes, the lack of the June internationals may have skewed our perceptions. Those games are usually where the engines are run in. Though I guess you could argue that applies to everyone else in the RC as well.
The imminent return of Scott Barrett gives cause for hope. The news about Retallick this morning (no “structural damage”) is better. Our reserve front row was extremely impressive last night. The Mounga-Barrett experiment may be worth persevering with (though like others, I agree Ben Smith is better at fullback). And there were encouraging signs in the second half when Aaron Smith, ALB and Dan Coles were injected.
The ABs’ stuttering start, plus the Wallabies’ more convincing display against Argentina, has given the Aussies a sniff for the Bledisloe Cup and confidence is returning in Australia. However, that is not such a bad thing for the ABs as it reduces the chance of complacency going into the Perth game. And keep in mind, Savea and Cane will be back for that.
So the glass looks more half full than half empty today.
-
@booboo said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Clearout was fine
First time I've seen the vision.
You have an interesting idea about what constitutes "fine". Cleanout was the very definition of illegal.
He is perhaps slightly in the side, but nothing out of the ordinary. If you PK'ed that for in the side the game would be a very long one.
Certainly there is no foul play in the clip as people on the radio are suggesting.
-
-
He said midfielder Sonny Bill Williams, who got through 60 minutes without further injury apart a scratched nose which required a few stitches, would not travel to Perth, rather he would be available for Counties' next two games before the return test at Eden Park on August 18. Highlanders first-five Josh Ioane would also play provincial rugby, Hansen said. -
@KiwiMurph said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
He said midfielder Sonny Bill Williams, who got through 60 minutes without further injury apart a scratched nose which required a few stitches, would not travel to Perth, rather he would be available for Counties' next two games before the return test at Eden Park on August 18.
Highlanders first-five Josh Ioane would also play provincial rugby, Hansen said.
Oooh SBW dropped, finally! But
-
@Machpants said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Oooh SBW dropped, finally!
Give him a break - he scratched his nose! You can't expect him to play with that! He'll look terrible, and what about his hair- it got all messed up as well.
-
@KiwiMurph so he needs more rugby, lets send him down to a comp we dont rate and and let him run around there for 2 weeks.
That confirms the 1 midfield change I thought was coming.
Stuff