• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps v India

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
823 Posts 48 Posters 66.5k Views
Black Caps v India
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • V Do not disturb
    V Do not disturb
    Virgil
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #699

    @Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v India:

    I find Santner annoying. Not talking about his ability but his mannerisms. That lanky walk while looking down, the way he doesn't jump when he bowls, and now those silly glasses he wears while batting.

    7 off 8 balls is an amazing effort when your supposed to be scoring 10+ runs each over,.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    wrote on last edited by
    #700

    The decision to send Santner in was very average. This is where a Coach earns his money. Noodling the ball around with wickets in hand will not win the game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #701

    Outstanding death bowling India. That is how you do it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #702

    I’m watching this on replay and have just seen the fucking shambles of a decision on the Mitchell dismissal.
    I’m in disbelief how an umpire can misinterpret the technology so bloody badly.
    It’s a bloody farce.

    What is the point in having hotspot if you’re not going to take any notice of it?

    That useless prick they call an umpire must be the only one on the planet that thought that was out.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #703

    @Gunner said in Black Caps v India:

    I’m watching this on replay and have just seen the fucking shambles of a decision on the Mitchell dismissal.
    I’m in disbelief how an umpire can misinterpret the technology so bloody badly.
    It’s a bloody farce.

    What is the point in having hotspot if you’re not going to take any notice of it?

    That useless prick they call an umpire must be the only one on the planet that thought that was out.

    I dunno - I don't think it was all that clear that the ball hit the bat was it? That very light mark could just as easily have been from contact with the pad. The way the ball looked to deviate it certainly seemed so on the front on first viewing, but maybe that was just a trick of the camera? There was not even a glimmer on snicko.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #704

    Mitchell was given out. If snicko and hot spot disagree, it should probably stay that way.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #705

    I’m obviously still behind, but catching up.

    That innings was bloody awful by the Caps, but India’s bowling, how good?

    Can anyone tell me why bloody Santner get to bat ahead of Kuggelijn and even Southee with only 5 overs to go?
    He looks so bloody awkward and looks like he’s struggling just to pick up the singles.

    We haven’t got anywhere near enough runs. India will chase this down in a canter.

    ToddyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #706

    @Gunner said in Black Caps v India:

    I’m obviously still behind, but catching up.

    That innings was bloody awful by the Caps, but India’s bowling, how good?

    Can anyone tell me why bloody Santner get to bat ahead of Kuggelijn and even Southee with only 5 overs to go?
    He looks so bloody awkward and looks like he’s struggling just to pick up the singles.

    We haven’t got anywhere near enough runs. India will chase this down in a canter.

    Pressure from Gilette?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #707

    @Virgil said in Black Caps v India:

    @Mokey said in Black Caps v India:

    I don't understand why Santner comes in ahead of Scott K. I really don't.

    Less rapey?

    I'm going to hell for laughing as much as I did at this post.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #708

    Funny how everyone always says '10-15 runs short'. India pissed that in. The reality is that at least 200 was par.

    PaekakboyzP 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #709

    @hydro11 or we did a better job of knocking off their top order. To few runs and they had a good start.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #710

    I'm having a retrospective whinge about the Daryl Mitchell LBW decision.

    I turned tele on milliseconds after he was given out on field, and he had said to Kane that he hit and asked if he should refer.

    Cool.

    Very first replay it was sooooo obvious he hit it I thought "oh good, not out".

    Then I hear hear dufus in the box saying " no bat".

    Say the fuck what? You fucking idiot.

    Then the rock and roll in very slomo was indecisive, but if they replayed the full replay he'd have seen the nick.

    Second, hot spot confirmed on both the bat and the ball.

    I will admit that there may have been a hotspot on the bat prior to the ball passing, possibly from brushing the pad . However hotspot was pretty definitive on both bat and ball from both sides.

    Sure snicko showed nothing. But the case for snicko being any sort of evidence is negated by Nigel "it could have come from anywhere, but I'm a complete moron" Llllllong.

    Upshot is the DRS failed miserably due to human error. Mitchell and NZ was fucked over by incompetence.

    Which brings me to my point.

    It was pretty obvious everybody, and I mean EVERYBODY, on the field knew Mitchell was not out.

    And it certainly appeared that Sharma said as much to Mitchell who then asked Sharma to speak to the umpires, which he started to do. At which point Dhoni intervened and seemed to persuade him not to.

    At this point I have lost any potential respect for Sharma who if he had any, ANY, integrity whatsoever he'd have called Mitchell back because he knew he was not out, but obviously has no mana or authority given he could be so overidden by his granddad MS.

    And as for Dhoni? Despite his demi-god status in India is obviously an unethical underhanded selfish twunt. Hope you make the final of the world cup and get given out to a shocker with 2 runs left on the last ball with no reviews left.

    BonesB MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #711

    PS. Well played India. We were 20 runs short.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #712

    @booboo how do you know it was obvious to everybody on the field? What's the protocol around disobeying the umpire?

    MN5M boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #713

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @booboo how do you know it was obvious to everybody on the field? What's the protocol around disobeying the umpire?

    Don't do it is generally a good rule of thumb in all sports.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #714

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v India:

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @booboo how do you know it was obvious to everybody on the field? What's the protocol around disobeying the umpire?

    Don't do it is generally a good rule of thumb in all sports.

    Well yeah that's what I thought - Cricket is pretty harsh on dissent too isn't it? Mitchell sticking around on the field and gasping at the ump seemed bad to me.

    MN5M rotatedR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #715

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v India:

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @booboo how do you know it was obvious to everybody on the field? What's the protocol around disobeying the umpire?

    Don't do it is generally a good rule of thumb in all sports.

    Well yeah that's what I thought - Cricket is pretty harsh on dissent too isn't it? Mitchell sticking around on the field and gasping at the ump seemed bad to me.

    Yep. He could be in danger of losing some of his match fee.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #716

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @booboo how do you know it was obvious to everybody on the field? What's the protocol around disobeying the umpire?

    Different issue.

    He was given out by the process and had to go.

    I expect him and Kane to be fined.

    But those unethical Indian fluffybunnies knew he wasn't out.

    If they had any thread of decency they would have called him back.

    What got me was Sharma obviously said something to Mitchell, who then said "tell the umpires". Gutless prick bailed and then Dhoni pulled him away.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #717

    @booboo said in Black Caps v India:

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @booboo how do you know it was obvious to everybody on the field? What's the protocol around disobeying the umpire?

    Different issue.

    He was given out by the process and had to go.

    I expect him and Kane to be fined.

    But those unethical Indian fluffybunnies knew he wasn't out.

    If they had any thread of decency they would have called him back.

    What got me was Sharma obviously said something to Mitchell, who then said "tell the umpires". Gutless prick bailed and then Dhoni pulled him away.

    What the? How did you see/hear all this? I certainly couldn't on my coverage.

    It strikes me as a bit disingenuous to moan about the ethics of the Indian team when you don't know who knew/heard/saw/said what and Mitchell won't even leave the field when he's been given out.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #718

    @booboo said in Black Caps v India:

    I'm having a retrospective whinge about the Daryl Mitchell LBW decision.

    I turned tele on milliseconds after he was given out on field, and he had said to Kane that he hit and asked if he should refer.

    Cool.

    Very first replay it was sooooo obvious he hit it I thought "oh good, not out".

    Then I hear hear dufus in the box saying " no bat".

    Say the fuck what? You fucking idiot.

    Then the rock and roll in very slomo was indecisive, but if they replayed the full replay he'd have seen the nick.

    Second, hot spot confirmed on both the bat and the ball.

    I will admit that there may have been a hotspot on the bat prior to the ball passing, possibly from brushing the pad . However hotspot was pretty definitive on both bat and ball from both sides.

    Sure snicko showed nothing. But the case for snicko being any sort of evidence is negated by Nigel "it could have come from anywhere, but I'm a complete moron" Llllllong.

    Upshot is the DRS failed miserably due to human error. Mitchell and NZ was fucked over by incompetence.

    Which brings me to my point.

    It was pretty obvious everybody, and I mean EVERYBODY, on the field knew Mitchell was not out.

    And it certainly appeared that Sharma said as much to Mitchell who then asked Sharma to speak to the umpires, which he started to do. At which point Dhoni intervened and seemed to persuade him not to.

    At this point I have lost any potential respect for Sharma who if he had any, ANY, integrity whatsoever he'd have called Mitchell back because he knew he was not out, but obviously has no mana or authority given he could be so overidden by his granddad MS.

    And as for Dhoni? Despite his demi-god status in India is obviously an unethical underhanded selfish twunt. Hope you make the final of the world cup and get given out to a shocker with 2 runs left on the last ball with no reviews left.

    I wish there were more guys playing like Adam Gilchrist.

    Possibly my all time favourite Aussie cricketer overall, fucken legend and I do remember admiring his stance on walking. Some fucken good humour in this vid too.

    What Australian Cricket did to deserve going from him to Brad Haddin is anyone's guess.

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Black Caps v India
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.