Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?
-
If Nonu looks half decent in next years SR is there any chance of a recall or does his age automatically put him out of contention despite being a cut above when at his best?
-
@african-monkey I really can't see that happening, but shit, Goodhue with an in form Nonu is a tasty sounding midfield.
-
@kiwimurph said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:
@junior I wouldn't say Carter was lucky to be selected for the RWC. By the time the actual RWC squad was selected it was after the ABs had demolished the Wallabies at Eden Park and Carter produced a performance that was clear that he was back.
"Lucky" is probably not the best word to use, but it might be fair to say that, had Cruden not been injured, it's not entirely clear that Carter goes on to have the role he eventually did.
-
I think there's a chance that the loose forward trio at the RWC will be Read, Cane and Papali'i. None of the blindsides post Kaino have impressed and if Dalton can have a good Super campaign at blindside, it would be worth a shot to play him in the RC and see how he goes. We usually go in with a bolter at most RWCs, it could be him this time.
-
Whilst I can’t see too much change in personal moving forward you never know when someone will have an outstanding season and push their claims or if there’s a lack of form from an incumbent or injury.
players I will be watching a little bit closer during super rugby are.Paripari Parkinson
Dalton Papalii
Akira Ioane
George Bridge
Billy Proctor
Wil Jordon
Brad WeberI believe if Akira has a massive super campaign,he has to be in the frame,also George Bridge comes into the same equation..
Brad Weber is probably ranked outside the group,but still has an opportunity if injuries arrive, I put Dalton in this area.
Just threw out a couple of other names out there..I really rate Parkinson to me he’s the closest to a Whitelock or Retallick moving forward,but maybe post World Cup he comes into the picture. -
-
@akan004 said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:
@bones A starting 6 or a bench cover for 8/6?
Bench cover for 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 11, 14.
As well as head coach, team doctor and general miracle worker, Head physio, head trainer, director of psychology, etc. He'll be stationed below Blake Gibson.
-
How are we tracking?
Pretty darn good I’d say.
We’ve lost what 3 or 4 games in the last 4 years?
Not always playing great rugby, but still winning. Winning ugly I think they call it. Nothing wrong with that, it builds character.
I tend to think the coaches are really experimenting with different game plans, all the while keeping something tucked up their sleeves for next year. -
We have a a combative, physical forward pack who will not be dominated and stable scrum & lineout. With those things you are on the shortlist to win the World Cup.
Unfortunately, comparing the two teams in the first post we no longer have (in order of importance); historically good defence, reliable goal kicking, confidence in the decision making of our 9, confidence in the decision making of our 10 and a stable midfield. Those things make me doubt the ability of this team to grind out a win like the 2011 Final or 2015 semi-final when things are tight.
The lack of concern (at least publicly) for some of those issues is alarming. The Lions series was an unpalatable result (if Chicago wasn't already) and should have been a major turning point for the side like the '93 Lions test loss, '07 World Cup loss or even '09 season where the coaching staff rung the alarm bells before the EOYT. Instead it seems to be business as usual for the side.
Hansen (and I guess Fox) are the only two in the whole set up who know what a RWC loss tastes like. Read, Whitelock, SBW and B.Smith have an idea how things were before the hoodoo was lifted. IMO there is a very real chance we make the same mistake we did in '99 where all warning signs were ignored from '98 and things were 'business as usual' after we mopped France etc. Many (including myself) made the mistake of thinking enough of the infrastructure remained from the 95-7 teams to assume '98 was an anomaly - but it wasn't.
That said, things can change, the '95 and '03 RWC sides were unfathomable 1 year out and those were both good sides. So by no means are we doomed, I just worry the coaching staff have a rosy view of their ability to hit the switch when required.
-
@rotated We have shown our ability to win ugly two times this year against quality committed opposition (SA in Pretoria, and England). As you say we are in the mix, I think we have the quality required to win the cup, and superior depth to any other country. Having said all that, as we observed over the 24 years from 1987 to 2011, it is a difficult competition to win and should not be taken for granted. We fans have been spoiled of late, but should be under no illusions that an AB win will be easy in knock out rugby, one off game and we are on the plane home. Shag knows what he is doing though, and I think the squad is building very well.
-
Big point missing in the posts above is that most of the symptoms described occur at periods in matches where we are trying different things. We are trying to build up a variety of playing systems and the ability to switch them up during matches.
I think recent games have shown evidence of that where, on the surface, it can look like we changed attitude or focus when, in reality, we made quite big changes like pod systems, width of first phase etc etc.
I think we made two major change ups in the England game which stopped them scoring for the last hour of the game. We went back to a 13/1/2 defensive system (after the 14/1 version resulted in a manipulated try) and we changed the midfield pods/drives.
What this means for RWC is that opposition teams will need a variety of analysed attacks and be able to assess which ones to use. England didn't have enough tricks and once they ran out of them the scoreboard got stuck. We have also developed, since 2015, an ability to change up before we need to ie move from plan B to C before the opposition implemented plans against B.
In some games (Lions Tour) we got this wrong and picked the wrong change but that was lesson learning.
McCaw was a huge key to the last RWCs because of his ability and leadership through admiration. Read is learning to be the leader we need through on field tactical changes and is hugely important. -
@canefan said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:
@rotated We have shown our ability to win ugly two times this year against quality committed opposition (SA in Pretoria, and England).
I didn't take that away from the last test. Yes they won and it was ugly, but the final 20 minutes did not inspire any confidence that it was a controlled landing. The TJP chargedown and then subsequent effortless march up the field by England are a massive concern.
They have shown an undeniable resilience and self-belief this season which was a missing piece of the puzzle when the side got punched in the mouth anytime between '99-'03. It makes a huge difference when something inevitably goes against them in three play-off games.
@canefan said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:
@rotated it is a difficult competition to win and should not be taken for granted.
We underestimate how difficult to win, but overestimate how hard it is to make the final if the cookie crumbles nicely. The key is to not trip over yourself on the way there and this side looks like they are capable of that.
-
-
@sparky said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:
Big surprise this year is Hansen sticking with SBW when week in, week out, he's the worst performing player in the Black Jersey.
They've stuck with Crotty as well and he came right.
-
Firstly, I think we travel better than most other teams. Japan are not good enough that home advantage will get them further than the quarter-finals at best (would require a victory over either Scotland or Ireland in pool play as a minimum). So it will basically be a RWC on genuinely neutral territory, with Ireland probably likely to have the best travelling contingent. The grounds should be fast and dry if I'm not mistaken, no complaints there.
I think our pack is set in stone, with the exception of 6. We have to hope that Whitelock, and especially Retallick, remain fit. Read too. But we have a lot of decent propping options on both sides of the scrum, and decent hookers, although we can do better than Harris for the 3rd choice.
In the backs, if things continue as they are, I'm not ruling out TJP as the starting 9 with TTT on the bench. Smith has been pretty average all season. I don't think the selectors are going to do the "Richie 10/BB 15" thing, so it'll be Beauden at 10. You can lock in Rieko at 11, and BFA at either 14 or 15. We see whether the selectors persist with McKenzie at 15, but the back three is still not entirely settled.
It's somewhat concerning to see that we still can't settle on a midfield. I think you can lock Goodhue into 13, and then hope Crotty and ALB stay fit. Laumape will be there or thereabouts, and despite his age, you can't entirely rule out Nonu. SBW needs a massive Super Rugby season, otherwise I would just leave him out altogether.
I think this will be the closest RWC ever. Sides like SA & Argentina will freely choose their European stars, France is likely to be better than at present, and the Lions sides will all be there or thereabouts.
I think the fans who should be the most worried are the Aussies - it's hard to think of any overseas players who could come back and significantly improve their team. They will always be a chance, but they are probably the only main player who seem to be actively regressing.
I think we will have as good a chance as any other team, but I don't buy any stonewall favourites talk.
-
@billy-tell said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:
I think we will have a god a chance as any other team, but I don't buy any stonewall favourites talk.
Richie is secretly coming back?
