• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Springboks V All Blacks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
842 Posts 75 Posters 56.4k Views
Springboks V All Blacks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • raznomoreR Offline
    raznomoreR Offline
    raznomore
    wrote on last edited by
    #48

    I just came here to see if we'd lost our aura. What's that? You say no one gives a fuck?? Just some shit trotted out annually to humanise a bunch of..ah..humans.

    Say no more fam. As you were then.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #49

    @rapido said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Scrum should be interesting this week.

    I've been impressed with the Boks scrum this year, after a few indifferent years for them considering their traditional strength in that area.

    I was very interested in ABs v Boks 1 at Wellington, as it was the first time Karl T started a test and so I watched closely to how he would go in the starting role.

    I have to cast my memory back 2 weeks now.

    The scrums with starting front rows were pretty much parity, with, I thought, Tuinukuafe having a very, very slight edge on Malherbe on that side of the scrum, and Kitshoff and Franks cancelled each other out. When Mtarawira cam on as second half sub he had the edge on Ofa T. I would say Mtarawira must be the best scrummaging prop Ofa T has come up against in the fellow sub role.

    I also watched the Boks v Wallabies scrums as I was very interested to see how Tupou would go in the starting role. Again it was pretty much parity until subs came on.

    I'm probably placing too much importance on 2 test greenhorns in Tongan Thor and Karl T, and rating opposites against them. But I've been so impressed with both that it has got me looking more closely.

    Boks hammered the English scrum in June (including a pushover penalty try). But that comes with a caveat that I'm not very impressed with current British scrummaging after their performances on the Lions tour. But they dominatedat to escape, not just edged them. (Incidentally, Joe Marler was a British prop of whom my opinion grew after that tour, but he has announced his retirement last week aged 28.)

    Fair points, although curious that at home and with Figallo at TH Pumas handled Boks scrum?

    RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #50

    Brendon Venter:

    I know for a fact that the All Black coaches didn't disrespect the Springboks because they rate them and would never have picked their best side if they didn't. Sometimes what you say as a coach off the field doesn't necessarily translate to what happens on the field. The All Black coaching staff would have told the players to respect the Springboks, but deep down they didn't.

    Wonder if he has dis-respected and under-estimated mixed up?

    Stuff
    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #51

    @taniwharugby So everry time the ABs lose to a team, they disrespect (or underestimate) them according to this author? What a bullshit. They just made too many mistakes and the Boks played wel; nothing to do with disrespecting (or underestimating) the opposition.

    kiwiinmelbK 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #52

    @pakman said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Fair points, although curious that at home and with Figallo at TH Pumas handled Boks scrum?

    OK, didn't see that match.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by Rapido
    #53

    That Venter article was a good read, actually. I'd encourage readers to actually click that link and read the whole thing, some interesting stuff also on Boks defence. Rather than skip it based on negative comments on here. Well done Stuff for actually commissioning some original journalism of an opposing view of the up-coming match.

    Disrespect, underestimate, take too lightly, whatever. It's semantics. He expects players won't make similar decisions in Pretoria due to a change in their mental approach of risk v reward.

    I agree the All Blacks approach will be different in Pretoria, tighter, more 'traditional test match like' and we already saw that in Buenos Aires

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #54

    When is the team named?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #55

    @rapido I think there is a big difference between disrepecting and underestimating someone.

    But then the quote I highlighted doesnt make alot of sense, otherwise not sure what the negative comments were.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #56

    @taniwharugby said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rapido I think there is a big difference between disrepecting and underestimating someone.

    But then the quote I highlighted doesnt make alot of sense, otherwise not sure what the negative comments were.

    Yeah I'm quite interested in how he knows it for a fact.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #57

    I’m always underestimating.

    When I predict the All Blacks by 10 they usually win by 20. When I say by 20 they win by 25+.

    I won’t ever do it again.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooper
    wrote on last edited by
    #58

    Get on with naming the team already....ffs

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #59

    @act-crusader said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    I’m always underestimating.

    When I predict the All Blacks by 10 they usually win by 20. When I say by 20 they win by 25+.

    I won’t ever do it again.

    Is that because you make the predication based on your Canta-blacks selection and not on the actual selection?

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to ShadowTrooper on last edited by
    #60

    @shadowtrooper yep, can genuinely ask, when is the team named?

    UniteU 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #61

    @Stargazer WHEN?????

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by kiwiinmelb
    #62

    @stargazer said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @taniwharugby So everry time the ABs lose to a team, they disrespect (or underestimate) them according to this author? What a bullshit. They just made too many mistakes and the Boks played wel; nothing to do with disrespecting (or underestimating) the opposition.

    I believe every now and then when we are on a winning streak a sub par performance is on the cards ,

    I don’t believe it has anything to do with how we view the opposition, just our own mental edge is not quite where it should be .

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • UniteU Offline
    UniteU Offline
    Unite
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #63

    @taniwharugby said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @shadowtrooper yep, can genuinely ask, when is the team named?

    5pm NZ time.

    Is that disrespect for naming the time when convenient for the NZ nightly news?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SouthernMann
    wrote on last edited by SouthernMann
    #64

    All Blacks to face Springboks from a very good source.

    New Zealand: Ben Smith, Waisake Naholo, Jack Goodhue, Sonny Bill Williams, Rieko Ioane, Beauden Barrett, Aaron Smith, Kieran Read (c), Sam Cane, Shannon Frizell, Scott Barrett, Sam Whitelock, Owen Franks, Codie Taylor, Karl Tu'inukuafe. Reserves: Nathan Harris, Tim Perry, Ofa Tuungafasi, Patrick Tuipulotu, Ardie Savea, TJ Perenara, Richie Mo'unga, Ryan Crotty.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #65

    @unite not sure, given they usually name at 5am which is when I am asleep, even more disrespectful

    @SouthernMann that is interesting as Crotty has been doing a little bit of media this week and that is usually an indicator they are looking to start.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #66

    If that's the team @mariner4life's toys will not stay in the cot long.

    HoorooH Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #67

    That was my preferred starting 15 - I'd be pleased.

    Not so sure about the hooker researve (although to be expected) plus no Dmac or ALB...

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Springboks V All Blacks
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.