• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
278 Posts 46 Posters 15.2k Views
Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to mimic on last edited by
    #252

    @mimic said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    I must admit, after watching this game, I believe Richie is the answer to the rush defence.

    His option taking and passing in tight spaces were brilliant.

    Using that game as the complete sample size, I would have him as the ABs starting 10.
    BB is a bit of an enigma. Maybe he suits test rugby better than Super somehow.
    If Mounga can play like that most of the time and also do so when given a shot in black he would be our best 10.

    Chester DrawsC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #253

    @crucial said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    If Mounga can play like that most of the time and also do so when given a shot in black he would be our best 10.

    That 'if" is doing some mighty heavy carrying.

    It needs to be a "because" before he gets to start as AB 10.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to shark on last edited by pakman
    #254

    @shark said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Laumape reminds me of Sam Tuitupou in many ways. Similarly limited but good enough at what he does well to please people when he’s on.

    Saw Sam last year playing club rugby for Coventry. A little larger round the middle, but still runs very punchy lines off the short ball.

    Does Laumape have any form with Lions locks? 😂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #255

    I watching the game again and focused on the Cnaes defense. It use to us a strength and now its a weakness

    Some of the defensive laps were school-boyish. For example two players grouping together with nil reason too. Savea and Lam were guilty of this

    Lam is not a great defender. He is not quick enough other than running straight. But moving quickly to one side. He's hopeless. So give him the ball with the line open or against poor defenders and he's brilliant. But otherwise not up to much.

    Savea was Ok-good but blundered once by not staying out instead moving in to help his mate out. Jordie is not a center. I doubt if he ever will be. Either FB or maybe 2nd 5 but he needs to learn the defensive ropes at 2nd. Laumape is great and poor. MS I can't really remember him doing anything bad but not much good either

    So Savea was the best of the outside back defensively along with Goosen when he came on. And thats the issue for me. Too many outside backs that are limited defensively. And a good+ defender (Goosen) and a good attacker doens't get to start. Hes a much better option than Jordie at center

    The forwards went well. But Shields made a few blunders and missed on easy enough tackle. If he wants to make the England starting team he will have to improve a lot of this front

    I'm unsure whats happened to the coaches. they just seem to have (completely) lost the plot. Don't they review the games afterwards. Defense has been an issue for some time

    Next years they must have a good defending mid-field. Its essential. BB is good as is Penenara. So Proctor and Goosen are two options. I haven't really watched Aso in this respect. Jordie isn't good enough. He might be one day but not yet. Laumape needs a lot of work on this aspect.

    Lam also needs to massively improve. Either do so or they must look at other options. The coaches have been rubbish this year. I thought the attack game plan was dreadful but there are also major issues with the back-line defense. Although to be fair the forward with lots of injuries went well. Maybe the fall out with Boyd leaving created fiction. I hope its this not Plumtree having lost it

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #256

    I am watching the game again too and I must say that the Canes scrum was not as bad as some ferners lamented (with one notable occasion though).
    Gareth Evans was their best forward while Toby Smith ran hard. Sam Lousi looked tired. Riccitelli as well. Maybe both of them have played too much this year.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DiceD Offline
    DiceD Offline
    Dice
    wrote on last edited by
    #257

    @winger That's one game though.

    Aso isn't that good in traffic and that's something he's going to have to deal with at 12. He has size but isn't much of a crash ball guy nor a guy who wins the gain line when he doesn't have space to work with. He reminds me a lot of Romi Ropati, who could also play 12, but did his best work at centre and wing.

    It's odd that you say that the Canes need a good defensive midfield, but champion Aso of all people to be in that midfield.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to cgrant on last edited by
    #258

    @cgrant said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    I am watching the game again too and I must say that the Canes scrum was not as bad as some ferners lamented (with one notable occasion though).
    Gareth Evans was their best forward while Toby Smith ran hard. Sam Lousi looked tired. Riccitelli as well. Maybe both of them have played too much this year.

    Spot on. Due to Coles' and Aumua's injuries, he has played the most minutes (1,231) of all hookers in the SR competition. The next one is Malcom Marx with 999 minutes, who obviously still has a game to play. That must be the 2nd year in a row for Riccitelli to play that much, considering Coles was also injured during most of the 2017 season and there was no adequate back-up (Apisai was also injured for some time).

    Only one frontower has played more than Riccitelli this year; Tom Robertson from the Waratahs with 1,252 minutes.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #259

    @winger Savea has always been a good defender IMO and I think that was one of the reasons the AB selectors kept him in for as long as they did.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #260

    Missed tackle stats are one thing but how/why they are missing tackles is more important.

    It’s interesting when you look back at stats alone there are a few quality centres that had relatively high missed tackle counts. Kahui for example, even Conrad.

    There’s not a rugby player on this earth that will ever not miss a tackle and yes the midfield is tough place to defend, but you know when someone’s not moving well or shoots out of the line and doesn’t read the play. Laumape, Reiko and Jordie have some ways to go when it comes to those aspects.

    taniwharugbyT DiceD 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #261

    @act-crusader not to mention how often a player mis-reads a play or is too slow to react, and the attacker waltzes past them (not a miss for them in stats) this player then beats the 2nd line of defence and the FB or winger gets a missed tackle stat, despite it not really being his fault.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #262

    @taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @act-crusader not to mention how often a player mis-reads a play or is too slow to react, and the attacker waltzes past them (not a miss for them in stats) this player then beats the 2nd line of defence and the FB or winger gets a missed tackle stat, despite it not really being his fault.

    Agree TR. Just on that, that is one of Jordie’s real strengths in defence. He’s an excellent cover tackler (as is his brother). They have the combination of good anticipation and speed to cover ground and run a good angle. Beauden one of the best I’ve ever seen.

    DMac isn’t too bad either. Havili ok and improving. He’s a better front on tackler and probably doesn’t have the pace of those other 3.

    Dan Carter (remember that guy) was a damn good 12 because his defence was superb. Copy book tackling technique and good eye for reading the play. He didn’t make every tackle but he rarely got caught out of position.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DiceD Offline
    DiceD Offline
    Dice
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by Dice
    #263

    @act-crusader I don't think Conrad has ever been that high in missed tackles, at least compared to the volume of tackles he made. I followed his stats for years and his tackle completion % was consistently around 89%- 90%. Honestly, it rarely went lower or higher than that, which I found fascinating.

    I remember when there use to be debates here on Conrad vs Kahui, and the tackle stats came out and Kahui had more missed tackles than Conrad, but Conrad attempted more than twice as many tackles. Conrad would be in my shortlist for GOAT defender.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #264

    @rocky-rockbottom said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    ps changed my profile pic in solidarity with my southern freak brothers

    Change it back to your Bloos logo ya freak

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #265

    Is that the same as @SammyC 's? If so we could get some amusing cases of mistaken identity

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #266

    @mariner4life haha I only just realised it wasnt @SammyC and was thinking I am certain that was your avatar already!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #267

    @rocky-rockbottom said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @mariner4life said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    we could get some amusing cases of mistaken identity

    it's gonna be weird getting thought of as someone who makes sense for 1 or 2 minute spells

    I'm looking forward to when the cantab mafia round on Sammy when he declares Akira Ioane to be waaaay better than Luke Whitelock; and for hating on Tana

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #268

    On J Barrett, for mine he's not suited to the midfield - certainly not centre - and I don't expect him to end up there as anything more than cover, at the highest levels. He's a gangly streak of weasel piss for a start which is a physique you don't see in the midfield for a reason. He's got some class about him at fullback and that appears to be what he should concentrate on as much as is within his own control (does that make sense??), given Bender won't be around in 18 months' time.

    Maybe it's B Barretts' career confusing me, but has J Barrett any background at 10? I can't recall. Kind of in the Leon MacDonald mould, if you can play fullback and 12 (and Jordie did make a good fist of 12 in his debut NPC season for Canterbury), I tend to think you should be able to play 10.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #269

    Noticed a bit of niggle emanating from Barrett the youngest. An errant shoulder and such

    Quite like it ( till he gives away a penalty in black) 🙂

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #270

    @siam said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Noticed a bit of niggle emanating from Barrett the youngest. An errant shoulder and such

    Quite like it ( till he gives away a penalty in black) 🙂

    wait, i thought the narrative was a bit of niggle was a dead giveaway for a bad attitude meaning that said player will never amount to anything at the higher level?

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #271

    @mariner4life said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @siam said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Noticed a bit of niggle emanating from Barrett the youngest. An errant shoulder and such

    Quite like it ( till he gives away a penalty in black) 🙂

    wait, i thought the narrative was a bit of niggle was a dead giveaway for a bad attitude meaning that said player will never amount to anything at the higher level?

    Only when it's Akira.

    Not when it's Coles, Retallick, Cane etc

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF
Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.