• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
278 Posts 46 Posters 15.2k Views
Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by Rapido
    #94

    Christ, almost a 12 point try. Go from grubbering it into someone's shins hot on attack time standing under your posts.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #95

    Ah fook it Jordie.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #96

    We're killing ourselves.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #97

    Lots of kicking by canes and only two have been good so far FFS

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #98

    Yikes, Justin Marshall just spoke a whole lot of sense...

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • FrankF Offline
    FrankF Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by
    #99

    Poor miss on Todd from Evans

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #100

    This is a shame. That forward dominance isn't happening yet. Just stupid shit. I'll be happy with this score at half time.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #101

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    This is a shame. That forward dominance isn't happening yet. Just stupid shit. I'll be happy with this score at half time.

    It is now

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    dingo
    wrote on last edited by
    #102

    TBF Grant Nesbit made a fair statement there. What was the penalty for when Codie Taylor popped his bind first? J Marshall appear to answer that its the zen of the thing.

    DamoD Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #103

    Sadly going to script so far

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • FrankF Offline
    FrankF Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by
    #104

    So George Bridge might have just got himself into the ABs ahead of NMS with that take. Very Ben Smith-like

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #105

    Todd brilliant.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #106

    @no-quarter said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Todd brilliant.

    Only looking that good cos Ardie of the field and injured.........

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #107

    Most disappointing thing so far is that our backline just doesn't look fluid at all. We aren't creating any great opportunities.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #108

    The story of last Super season was the NZ dominance (and Lions).

    The story of this year is the Crusaders dominance. Not surprising when Dagg and Crockett can't even make the 23. Not team even looks close.

    Talk about an unbalanced competition.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #109

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @no-quarter said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Todd brilliant.

    Only looking that good cos Ardie of the field and injured.........

    It was clever by Jules to place the ball and buy himself time but Todd picked it and grabbed the ball, killing off the first half. Nothing to do with Ardie, the guy is just all class.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #110

    @no-quarter

    alt text

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    wrote on last edited by
    #111

    Canes are poor so far

    Poor defense. Too many unforced mistakes (two cost 12 points). And totally and utterly clueless on attack

    They will need to stop producing this garbage rugby or the will loss by 50 points

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to dingo on last edited by
    #112

    @dingo said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    TBF Grant Nesbit made a fair statement there. What was the penalty for when Codie Taylor popped his bind first? J Marshall appear to answer that its the zen of the thing.

    Though Codie came up first, the reason he popped up was because the canes players were back pedalling and bailed out, forcing the scrum up rather than backwards.

    Looked a reasonable call to me.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    dingo
    replied to Damo on last edited by dingo
    #113

    @damo said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @dingo said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    TBF Grant Nesbit made a fair statement there. What was the penalty for when Codie Taylor popped his bind first? J Marshall appear to answer that its the zen of the thing.

    Though Codie came up first, the reason he popped up was because the canes players were back pedalling and bailed out, forcing the scrum up rather than backwards.

    Looked a reasonable call to me.

    So what were they penalised for exactly? From the rules book.

    They didn't collapse. They weren't popped. To me it didn't look like their Loose forwards released early...So what?

    I'm not arguing it wasn't the right decision but why? What was the exact infringement ruled?

    DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF
Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.