• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders vs Waratahs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusaderswaratahs
243 Posts 45 Posters 14.5k Views
Crusaders vs Waratahs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #218

    @tim said in Crusaders vs Waratahs:

    Waratahs should be extremely pissed off by that.

    Irritated, but if we're honest, that's not the reason we lost a game we should have won. We went away from what was working for us in the first half.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #219

    @nepia said in Crusaders vs Waratahs:

    @chris-b said in Crusaders vs Waratahs:

    Fuck you, Joe!

    We need to clone Wyatt Crockett.

    Loosehead prop who can play lots of minutes without getting broken and without doing ridiculously dumb shit!

    However the explanatory calculations run, he'll get two weeks for that.

    Wait, are you sure you're talking about Crockett?

    When Chris B said that I was immediately thinking of Crockett injuring himself in the last RWC with his flying elbow ruck clean out.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #220

    @rapido To be fair, apart from a few select highlights, my rugby memory doesn't extend much beyond a week these days. 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by MajorRage
    #221

    Massive dive by Beale!!!

    ToddyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by Toddy
    #222

    @majorrage

    Messam's against South Africa in 2013 would've had the Jaguares nodding in appreciation.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Toddy on last edited by nzzp
    #223

    @toddy said in Crusaders vs Waratahs:

    Messam's against South Africa in 2013 would've had the Jaguares nodding in appreciation.

    Wow. I just no longer know what is satire any more.

    As an aside, have been watching some old AB SA games while exercising. Messam has been simply immense against him - a fair few saffer fans I know rate him, and I can see why based on his perforamnce against them. He was quality for a long time.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #224

    Wow, I can't wait to read the decision.

    UniteU 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • UniteU Offline
    UniteU Offline
    Unite
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #225

    @stargazer

    That seems pretty light to me.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #226

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Unite on last edited by
    #227

    @unite Yes, that's what it seems to me as well, but we haven't seen all the angles. All we know at the moment is that the entry point was 4 weeks. We don't know exactly yet what he was deemed to be guilty of (and/or not guilty of).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    wrote on last edited by
    #228

    Having seen those still shots 2 weeks seems anout right to me. However i would be pissed if i was a tah supporter. That try was a turning point. Take that away and add a yellow or red card and i don't see the Crusaders getting back into the game.
    Oh well, im happy to see that happen to any team with Folau in it.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #229
    It has now been found that Moody contravened Law 9.12: Striking with hand or arm.
    
    In his finding, Foul Play Review Committee Chairman Nigel Hampton QC ruled the following: “Having conducted a detailed review of all the available evidence, including all camera angles and a statement from the player, and submissions from his legal representative, Aaron Lloyd, the Foul Play Review Committee upheld the citing under Law 9.12.”
    
    “With respect to sanction the Foul Play Review Committee deemed the act of foul play merited a mid-range entry point of 4 weeks due to the dangerous contact with the opposing Player’s head. However, taking into account mitigating factors including the Player’s excellent judicial record, good character and guilty plea at the earliest possible opportunity, the Foul Play Review Committee reduced the suspension to 2 weeks.”
    
    “The player is therefore suspended for 2 weeks, up to and including Friday 25 May 2018.”
    
    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #230

    @pukunui said in Crusaders vs Waratahs:

    i would be pissed if i was a tah supporter. That try was a turning point. Take that away and add a yellow or red card and i don't see the Crusaders getting back into the game.

    Yeah, nah. Thing is there were another stack of chances to win or stay ahead in that game, and we blew it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #231

    The World Rugby Laws thing is offline apparently, and I believe they "simplified" it recently by rewriting a few sections.

    I still had the 2015 copy I downloaded for one of our guys being cited. It states that under Law 10.4(a) Striking another Player with a hand, arm or fist the entry level is 2 weeks, Mid-range is 5 weeks, Top End 8 weeks.

    However, if they deemed it contact to the head - and understanding that Moody has a clean record* - then it doesn't send a great message about all the concussion-related stuff and protecting players' heads that has been talked about.

    Not sure what his character has to do with fuck all. Its not a popularity contest.

    But it was always going to be 2-4 weeks so yeah, all good.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #232

    @stargazer said in Crusaders vs Waratahs:

    It has now been found that Moody contravened Law 9.12: Striking with hand or arm.
    
    In his finding, Foul Play Review Committee Chairman Nigel Hampton QC ruled the following: “Having conducted a detailed review of all the available evidence, including all camera angles and a statement from the player, and submissions from his legal representative, Aaron Lloyd, the Foul Play Review Committee upheld the citing under Law 9.12.”
    
    “With respect to sanction the Foul Play Review Committee deemed the act of foul play merited a mid-range entry point of 4 weeks due to the dangerous contact with the opposing Player’s head. However, taking into account mitigating factors including the Player’s excellent judicial record, good character and guilty plea at the earliest possible opportunity, the Foul Play Review Committee reduced the suspension to 2 weeks.”
    
    “The player is therefore suspended for 2 weeks, up to and including Friday 25 May 2018.”
    

    He's a very lucky boy. Leave your fate in the hands of the judiciary and anything can happen

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #233

    Below is the relevant bit of the WR Handbook. I think what the key difference is between the accusations from Australian media on the one hand, and the citing and decision of SANZAAR on the other, is that the Aussies claimed that Moody hit Beale's throat with his elbow. The charge and decision are about striking with the hand or arm, not elbow. That's why they started with a mid-rang entry point of 4 instead of 6 weeks.

    APPENDIX 1. WORLD RUGBY SANCTIONS FOR FOUL PLAY (REGULATION 17)

    0_1526207839616_1a58c3ef-3c5b-43b3-a929-155d54e4b453-image.png

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #234

    @Stargazer very important distinction. Maybe he would have had 4 weeks if the reduction stood at 2 weeks.

    But treading a very fine line - any martial artist will tell you a forearm strike is just an elbow you mistimed 😉

    From now its up to Moody's good character to see it doesn't happen again, because he can't fall back on "clean record".

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #235

    Also at what point do you have a "clean" record if you have a warning from the citing commissioner?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #236

    @nzzp said in Crusaders vs Waratahs:

    @toddy said in Crusaders vs Waratahs:

    Messam's against South Africa in 2013 would've had the Jaguares nodding in appreciation.

    Wow. I just no longer know what is satire any more.

    As an aside, have been watching some old AB SA games while exercising. Messam has been simply immense against him - a fair few saffer fans I know rate him, and I can see why based on his perforamnce against them. He was quality for a long time.

    Don't know why, but Messam played like he way 5 kg bigger most of the times he played Boks, recall some extraordinary disruption of their maul.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #237

    Phew lucky for moody and ABs, the Ozzie forums are going to go nuts. Four weeks looks about right to me, initial impact chest, but just fkn stupid. Minus two weeks is stupid, but that is the citing random number generator in action.

    Re Messam, he's been playing better this season than the last few I think, real freedom and venom

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Crusaders vs Waratahs
Rugby Matches
crusaderswaratahs
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.