Highlanders vs Lions
-
Fuck me knock-on city currently
-
They're throwing it around inside their own 22, leaving the door open for the Lions.
-
Coltman, Franklin, Whitelock, Hammington and Matchbox with huge games. Walden a very mercurial game, some absolute hair tearing moments mixed with some sweet touches, more of the former though.
Refereeing was all over the show.
Dickson made a very good cameo.
-
Happy to get that win with A Smith out. We look lethal when outsides get ball. Whitelock had a a big game but overall The forwards have gone backwards. Don't think it's coaching just wear and tear of the combative style they play with very little turnover in personal overvthe years. That forward pack that finished though, geeze wldnt wantbtgem on the field for too long.
-
@damo said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@gt12 said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@nepia said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@gt12 said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@Damo will probably be able to clear this up, but I think the falcon ruling is right, if the player is not playing at it.
However, it should have been a penalty and YC.
When did not playing at it start creeping into rugby?
The laws state that:
A player offside under Law 10.4c cannot be put onside by any action of an opponent, apart from a charge down.
Except if an opponent intentionally touches the ball (which is the same thing).
10.4 c relates to the 10m law, which is not the case here. However that's not really relevant here.
Oops, sorry, so is it 10.6 c iv that applies?
- Other than under Law 10.4c, an offside player can be put onside when:
C. An opponent of that player:
Iv. Intentionally touches the ball without gaining possession of it
What do you think of the idea that the opponent put himself there deliberately (I.e., is a lazy runner?) in that case could you interpret it to be play on? Or, penalize the retiring player?
What I’m asking is, what would you do?
-
@gt12 live, I would have missed it and awarded the try.
As the TMO I think I'd do what the TMO did. He didn't intentionally play the ball. The lions player is subject to PK for interfering in the play, but it's a stretch to say his action of merely being there qualifies as putting Smith onside in terms of the law you quoted.
Blame the law if you like, but I don't think there is any option here.
-
@nepia said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@damo said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@nepia said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@majorrage said in Highlanders vs Lions:
The clan are getting away with forward passes all over the show .... then that lineout wasn't straight ....
Yep, although, you could possibly give the TMO a pass for that not stepping on the line that Sumo keeps going on about - he was obscured by Sopoaga a bit and probably looked like a foot would have to be out from that.
I thought the right foot was grounded over the touchline. Looked like the right call to me.
Didn't look like it on any of the 3 or 4 replays to me (or Sumo).
Willie Lose thought he was in touch (which makes me think I'm probably wrong).
-
-
Thanks. As our resident ref, I was interested in your thoughts. I’m not sure that there are any problems with the law (that wasn’t my point), and I assume that the ref could have got around them anyway if they ruled that the player put themselves there to interfere with play.
-
Problem being that the Lions boofhead purposefully stopped an attacking phase 15 metres out. Lazy running.
Had the ball not rebounded to bender it was a straight penalty and reasonable yellow card.
That the refs patently had no idea how to adjudicate this rare situation is understandable but not recognising the professional foul doesn't fill with confidence.
Substandard refereeing by all.
Similarly when the Lions winger tried to rescue a ball on the touchline only to fling it miles forward, the gathering Lions player was acres offside yet the apparent theatre of it all seemed to distract all referees and assistants and only a scrum for the forward throw was adjudicated.
I know this rule from the abortion that was the last minutes of a recent British Lions series. It had to be a penalty.
I'm sceptical that we're not teaching referees to play what's in front of them. Although Gardiner usually has some feel for the game and is one of the best.
Good win though
Whitelock has been playing good footy for 18 months now, very reliable.
Wee halfback tried his tits out
BFA always snaffles a few yards and a piece of momentum, mighty player
Lentjes goes well for a smaller ish 7. Worth keeping an eye on as a new Josh Blackie type
Coltman before Ricitelli surely?
We just need a playoff spot, a good dollop of luck, Buckman, Squire and Li (gulp) back, all other 1st choicers fit and we might be able to guts out 3 finals.Whatever happens, the 'landers are a good bunch to support at the moment, Mauger's done alright so far
-
@damo said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@nepia said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@damo said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@nepia said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@majorrage said in Highlanders vs Lions:
The clan are getting away with forward passes all over the show .... then that lineout wasn't straight ....
Yep, although, you could possibly give the TMO a pass for that not stepping on the line that Sumo keeps going on about - he was obscured by Sopoaga a bit and probably looked like a foot would have to be out from that.
I thought the right foot was grounded over the touchline. Looked like the right call to me.
Didn't look like it on any of the 3 or 4 replays to me (or Sumo).
Willie Lose thought he was in touch (which makes me think I'm probably wrong).
Wasn't Lose talking about a different scenario there? That was the one where the 'Landers took the quick throw and Thompson screwed up in midfield passing to Sopoaga?
