Highlanders vs Lions
-
@gunner said in Highlanders vs Lions:
He refs have well and truly bottled that
Sounded like the TMO had no clue what to do, and just told the ref what happened. I've no bloody idea if an inadvertant touch puts people in front of the kicker onside -- but they just ruled that if you don't play at it, it doesn't~
-
@gt12 said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@Damo will probably be able to clear this up, but I think the falcon ruling is right, if the player is not playing at it.
However, it should have been a penalty and YC.
When did not playing at it start creeping into rugby?
-
@nepia said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@gt12 said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@Damo will probably be able to clear this up, but I think the falcon ruling is right, if the player is not playing at it.
However, it should have been a penalty and YC.
When did not playing at it start creeping into rugby?
The laws state that:
A player offside under Law 10.4c cannot be put onside by any action of an opponent, apart from a charge down.
Except if an opponent intentionally touches the ball (which is the same thing).
-
@gt12 said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@nepia said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@gt12 said in Highlanders vs Lions:
@Damo will probably be able to clear this up, but I think the falcon ruling is right, if the player is not playing at it.
However, it should have been a penalty and YC.
When did not playing at it start creeping into rugby?
The laws state that:
A player offside under Law 10.4c cannot be put onside by any action of an opponent, apart from a charge down.
Except if an opponent intentionally touches the ball (which is the same thing).
Oh right, cheers. Does being offside and running into the path of the ball constitute 'intentionally touching the ball'?
-
@damo thats a bullshit explanation, its not like the halfback passed the ball intentionally into the offside player. The offside player had plenty time to get out of the way. If the ball hits him its intentional because he got there intentionally