• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Aussie Pro Rugby

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
australia
5.2k Posts 137 Posters 924.2k Views
Aussie Pro Rugby
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #471

    @no-quarter said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    @chris-b said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    @no-quarter said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    and the idiots on social media work themselves into a lather.

    We have met the enemy and he is us! 🙂

    The Fern is different!! Just don't mention the Cookie Monster...

    I'm afraid not. We are all now "Internet Personalities".

    We should be fucking ashamed!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #472

    @barbarian said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    I hardly think that can be used to adequately gauge the level of public outrage. Nor can social media for that matter.

    OK. Well let's go a different metric - I've had more than a few conversations at work about it. My girlfriend (not a huge rugby head but understands the game thankfully) has wanted to chat about it. My mum brought it with me yesterday.

    Now this may not constitute 'outrage' but I certainly think there has been a very high interest.

    I just had my kid at a 3 day rugby camp and nobody even mentioned it. There is only "high" interest because the media keeps fanning the flames.

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #473

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    I just had my kid at a 3 day rugby camp and nobody even mentioned it. There is only "high" interest because the media keeps fanning the flames.

    Of course. But it's a bit of a chicken and egg thing. Rugby journos are on it because it's broken beyond the sport, and it's probably getting good clicks/comments online.

    But I've forgotten what we're even arguing about now, so I'll tap out here.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #474

    alan jones wanking on (and on) since - well - forever.

    The whole freedom of speech argument is a non sequitar.

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by MajorRage
    #475

    I thought actually a fair article from Jones - as an opinion piece anyway. It's not written as fact, and presents one side of things.

    Rugby has taken some decent strides over the years in ensuring acceptance for people who bat for the other team. It's most high profile ref is open, a lions captain is open & then you have well recognised and supported gay rugby competitions and teams. This didn't happen overnight.

    Folau posting things like this could be read as taking some backward steps and in a public forum, does need to be dealt with. Yes, there are contradictions all over the show, but the ARU almost has an obligation to World Rugby to condemn.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Online
    CatograndeC Online
    Catogrande
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #476

    @majorrage said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    I thought actually a fair article from Jones - as an opinion piece anyway. It's not written as fact, and presents one side of things.

    Rugby has taken some decent strides over the years in ensuring acceptance for people who bat for the other team. It's most high profile ref is open, a lions captain is open & then you have well recognised and supported gay rugby competitions and teams. This didn't happen overnight.

    Folau posting things like this could be read as taking some backward steps and in a public forum, does need to be dealt with. Yes, there are contradictions all over the show, but the ARU almost has an obligation to World Rugby to condemn.

    Correct me if I'm wrong - and I say that 'cos I know you bastards will, but didn't Folau simply answer a question that was put to him rather than trumpet his views? That's my recollection anyway and if true then I would want to know who posed the question and why?

    MajorRageM boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #477

    @catogrande said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    Correct me if I'm wrong - and I say that 'cos I know you bastards will, but didn't Folau simply answer a question that was put to him rather than trumpet his views? That's my recollection anyway and if true then I would want to know who posed the question and why?

    Correct ... but it was online and he chose to answer it. Between twitter, instagram etc he gets loads of questions but doesn't answer them all ...

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Online
    CatograndeC Online
    Catogrande
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #478

    @majorrage Fair enough, he has some culpability then.

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by Tim
    #479

    @dogmeat said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    The whole freedom of speech argument is a non sequitar.

    No it isn't.

    Calls of "hate speech", which are calls of censorship, have been published in all the newspapers.

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by MajorRage
    #480

    @catogrande said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    @majorrage Fair enough, he has some culpability then.

    I get your point though - this happens all the time in interview, especially with Steve Hansen, Michael Chieka, Eddie Jones.

    They'll hold a press conference as required by their employers, world rugby, broadcasters etc. and then a reporter will say ask one of them a direct question which will be answered diplomatically with an opinion on it ... then the headline on the opposite side of the equator will read "Hansen Slams 6 Nations After Dismal England Performance" ... then every Harby-Jones, Tarquin, and Griffith-Joyner will go nuts acting like Hansen called it to explicityly have a go.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #481

    @catogrande said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    @majorrage said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    I thought actually a fair article from Jones - as an opinion piece anyway. It's not written as fact, and presents one side of things.

    Rugby has taken some decent strides over the years in ensuring acceptance for people who bat for the other team. It's most high profile ref is open, a lions captain is open & then you have well recognised and supported gay rugby competitions and teams. This didn't happen overnight.

    Folau posting things like this could be read as taking some backward steps and in a public forum, does need to be dealt with. Yes, there are contradictions all over the show, but the ARU almost has an obligation to World Rugby to condemn.

    Correct me if I'm wrong - and I say that 'cos I know you bastards will, but didn't Folau simply answer a question that was put to him rather than trumpet his views? That's my recollection anyway and if true then I would want to know who posed the question and why?

    Correct me if I'm wrong - and I say that 'cos I know you bastards will, but didn't Folau simply answer a question that was put to him rather than trumpet his views? That's my recollection anyway and if true then I would want to know who posed the question and why?

    Can I just slide a wee opinion in here ... and again correct me if I am wrong ... and forgive me (like any Christian would or should do) ... as I forgive the weasel words of those who twitter against us ... but Folau never suggested that homosexuals should go to hell, or that he wants them to (that would be very un-Christian of him).

    Hardly "hate speech", more expressing an opinion derived from the Bible that they WILL go to Hell. Not "I hate you and I hope you burn".

    You'd hope a Christian would express something more akin to "I hope you are redeemed and don't go to Hell".

    WANTING someone to go to Hell is (or should be) anathema to a Christian.

    Remember that billboard that "God loves Osama bin Ladin"? In Christianity everyone is loved, including those we'd kind of like, on normal circumstances, to see suffer for eternity.

    ... geez listen to me ... who am I? Billy Graham?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #482

    OK what the fuck... Rebels get a penalty and don't tell the ref their decision for like 2-3 mins. He just waits.

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #483

    @bones said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    OK what the fuck... Rebels get a penalty and don't tell the ref their decision for like 2-3 mins. He just waits.

    Yep, that was a joke. And karma kicks in and the Rebels fuck it up completely 🙂 🙂

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #484

    @donsteppa after the ref swallow his whistle again. Nicely done Berry, nicely done.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #485

    That was arrogant from the Rebels. Paid the price. Well done Jags.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #486

    Tahs too much class for the Reds.

    Tahs a totally different side from last year. Not sure theyll have the forwards to really compete at the pointy end but they are clearly the best Aus team.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #487

    Shine coming off Thorne's coaching from those fans who think Quade is the answer...

    Fact: Reds haven't won with Higginbotham on the field this year

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #488
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #489

    @nta said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    Fact: Reds haven't won with Higginbotham on the field this year

    I'm happy to believe this is a clear case of causation.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #490

    Our club yesterday: 15 blokes showed up and the other team were all big, BIG boys. The 51yo Scottish prop who should never play above Third Grade wasn't thrilled that he had to start, and he ended up playing the whole game. Luckily one of the guys who came along brought another prop. We fucking dicked them at scrum time - couple of tight heads even, but they had power and pace out wide and we ended up playing with 13 as two injuries mounted. Final result was 86-0 as we just ran out of puff.

    Could be worse; we could be Penrith Grade hosting Sydney Uni yesterday:
    0-97
    7-137
    5-98
    0-87

    antipodeanA Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
    2

Aussie Pro Rugby
Sports Talk
australia
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.