Hurricanes v Chiefs
-
@bones said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:
@dingo said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:
@bones said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:
@dingo I'd go with Aumua....
Which I suspect worries all of us.
Really? Why's that? I'm not worried...
Coles was considered not AB material for a long time, and then suddenly he was and then he became our first choice hooker very rapidly. Now he has been long term broken we all think about who is the replacement.
In general, hookers are battle hardened,not young fellas. Which is why RR comes into considerations.
-
-
-
@bones only because comes hasn't been playing... or have I been woosh'd!
-
@paekakboyz well when Coles was playing before injury, his form wasn't as good as Taylors...
-
@paekakboyz Taylor has progressed a lot in Coles' absence. He's at least as good, maybe even better than Coles was when he last played.
-
Great play again by DMac.
-
@antipodean Running into the touchline?
-
But was that post head knock? Would agree he wasn't at his best. But still the clear first choice imo
-
-
@paekakboyz I'd disagree it's clear, Coles wouldn't be bad off the bench...
-
@dingo said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:
@bones said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:
@dingo I'm confused. If Coles doesn't come back, won't we still select 3 hookers?
And our three hookers would be?
I argue RR should be one of them.
Don't think they'll stray from previous selections and I wouldn't argue with that.
-
@bones said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:
@dingo said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:
@bones said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:
@dingo I'm confused. If Coles doesn't come back, won't we still select 3 hookers?
And our three hookers would be?
I argue RR should be one of them.
Don't think they'll stray from previous selections and I wouldn't argue with that.
Where as I'd argue they have made previous selections thinking Coles would come back.
