• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
947 Posts 62 Posters 100.0k Views
Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Paekakboyz on last edited by
    #470

    @paekakboyz yeah I saw a headline today with Trevor Chappel saying that it will never leave Smith

    MokeyM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #471

    @taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @paekakboyz yeah I saw a headline today with Trevor Chappel saying that it will never leave Smith

    Yeah, case in point about how long the stain lasts: Trevor Chappell. And that was something that was actually legal. I actually feel a bit sorry for him. He was probably thinking, at last, my black moment has been eclipsed and I can fly under the radar. And then every article says 'not since the underarm incident...'

    At the very least some senior heads need to roll. This current Aussie team clearly has some major culture issues that a one match ban/fine isn't nearly going to address.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • PNP Offline
    PNP Offline
    PN
    wrote on last edited by PN
    #472

    alt text

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #473

    Lehman expected to resign.

    And in a massive shock, it's now being claimed that Warner is the "ringleader"

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #474

    @kiwimurph said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    In my uneducated opinion, I dare say there was never a senior players meeting to discuss cheating - Smith made that up to take the heat of a young Cameron Bancroft not realising the outrage that would follow.
    
    — Moises Henriques 
    
    Ps. Not saying no one was aware of Cameron doing it, just highly doubt there was a ‘senior players meeting’ to decide to cheat. I think it was the captain attempting to protect a young player. They had 10 mins of panic between end of play & press conference.
    
    — Moises Henriques
    

    this has to be a joke, surely?

    KiwiMurphK RapidoR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #475

    @mariner4life

    https://twitter.com/Mozzie21

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #476

    @kiwimurph yea, i get it's from a legit source. So he's either joking, dim, or being a bit of a fluffybunny to Bancroft to back up his mate.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #477

    @mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @kiwimurph said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    In my uneducated opinion, I dare say there was never a senior players meeting to discuss cheating - Smith made that up to take the heat of a young Cameron Bancroft not realising the outrage that would follow.
    
    — Moises Henriques 
    
    Ps. Not saying no one was aware of Cameron doing it, just highly doubt there was a ‘senior players meeting’ to decide to cheat. I think it was the captain attempting to protect a young player. They had 10 mins of panic between end of play & press conference.
    
    — Moises Henriques
    

    this has to be a joke, surely?

    The senior leadership team are all fellow NSWmen.

    But it could be partly plausible?

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #478

    @rapido the only way i could see any of it being plausible is the "no senior player meeting" bit. The rest insinuates that Bancroft did it off his own bat, Smith knew but didn't orchestrate, and only took to "blame" to cover a young fulla, out of the goodness of his heart.

    That's a bit of a stretch

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #479

    @mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @rapido the only way i could see any of it being plausible is the "no senior player meeting" bit. The rest insinuates that Bancroft did it off his own bat, Smith knew but didn't orchestrate, and only took to "blame" to cover a young fulla, out of the goodness of his heart.

    That's a bit of a stretch

    Didn't Smith admit there was a meeting?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    wrote on last edited by
    #480

    Bancroft must be a good actor then, he certainly came across as genuine during the interview. And the footage of him freaking out and hiding the tape.

    Sooner this gets fully aired the better. Has got murkier by the day as to who led or was involved in the planning. You'd think Bancroft would have fallen on his sword if it was actually his idea, independent of any input by Smith or other players.

    Boof staying silent is the really interesting part - but no doubt we'll know more soon.

    V 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #481

    @barbarian Welcome to my bandwagon.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Magpie_in_ausM Offline
    Magpie_in_ausM Offline
    Magpie_in_aus
    wrote on last edited by
    #482

    I am going to find a replay of the CWC Final and grab my fine tooth comb.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    replied to Paekakboyz on last edited by Virgil
    #483

    @paekakboyz said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    Bancroft must be a good actor then, he certainly came across as genuine during the interview. And the footage of him freaking out and hiding the tape.

    Sooner this gets fully aired the better. Has got murkier by the day as to who led or was involved in the planning. You'd think Bancroft would have fallen on his sword if it was actually his idea, independent of any input by Smith or other players.

    Boof staying silent is the really interesting part - but no doubt we'll know more soon.

    Surely it would have been less of a mess of it was just Bancroft, implicating smith and other senior players makes it a much bigger mess.
    This theory makes no sense.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #484

    I'm waiting for the 12th man to come out of retirement, he would have a field day with this.

    V 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #485

    @chimoaus said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    I'm waiting for the 12th man to come out of retirement, he would have a field day with this.

    He posted this yesterday

    The 12th Man

    The 12th Man

    I've been too stunned and too sad to even think what I might want to say about the events in South Africa. How dare these clowns tarnish our reputation, and the game itself, in such a disgusting...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #486

    Remember that episode of FOTC where Murray and co are at the trade show and their stall is next to the Australian Consulate's one?

    Well, NZ just beat England by an innings ...... in case y'all missed it ......

    Baron Silas GreenbackB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #487

    @bovidae said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    @donsteppa said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    Jason Gillespie:
    We need this information and we need it yesterday because I know of at least one senior player who is outraged that they have been dragged into the dirt by association without having been involved at all.

    Starc and Hazlewood have now been mentioned as those players.

    It's possible, but it would seem to somewhat defeat the purpose of ball tampering if your leading seamers didn't know what you were doing?

    They've really got to give Smith, Bancroft and Warner decent bans to rehabilitate them so that people sort of go "they've done their time". If they go soft on them, the scandal will just play on that much longer - like the booing of Quade Cooper.

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #488

    I did like the way Smith threw Bancroft under the bus. Front a press conference and turn to the young bloke to your right and ask him to explain himself. Good leadership.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #489

    @chris-b said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    They've really got to give Smith, Bancroft and Warner decent bans to rehabilitate them so that people sort of go "they've done their time". If they go soft on them, the scandal will just play on that much longer - like the booing of Quade Cooper.

    Well according to Cricinfo they don't play another Test until December (though there are unconfirmed reports they are going to Bangladesh at some point before then). Which puts them in a bit of a bind.

    A six month ban would see them miss ODIs and T20s in England. That seems the bare minimum. One year would put them out of the home series against India. To me that seems like an overreaction given the public shaming they have been subject to.

    And I'd suggest no ban will ever be enough to stop the booing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.