• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Sunwolves vs Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefssunwolves
79 Posts 22 Posters 4.5k Views
Sunwolves vs Chiefs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #52

    Sunwolves should have been kicked out of the comp instead of the Force. A bunch of shithouse locals and has-been expats who’ve added yet another long haul flight to the comp.

    KiwiMurphK antipodeanA ShadowTrooperS 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #53

    @donsteppa Australia are much better off with 4 teams instead of 5.

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooper
    wrote on last edited by
    #54

    I think ithe Sunwolves were a handy option for the Joseph/Brown combo to get another gig

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #55

    @kiwimurph my thinking is that - if we had to make a choice of kicking teams out - the comp was a lot better off with a stopover game from/to South Africa than with teams like the Sunwolves and Jaguares adding SFA except travel. Though it does help the remaining four Oz teams in the short run.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooper
    wrote on last edited by
    #56

    Did the Chiefs scrum stop pushing there?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #57

    @donsteppa said in Sunwolves vs Chiefs:

    Sunwolves should have been kicked out of the comp instead of the Force. A bunch of shithouse locals and has-been expats who’ve added yet another long haul flight to the comp.

    Long term we're going to need that money. Think of it as an investment.

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #58

    @antipodean said in Sunwolves vs Chiefs:

    @donsteppa said in Sunwolves vs Chiefs:

    Sunwolves should have been kicked out of the comp instead of the Force. A bunch of shithouse locals and has-been expats who’ve added yet another long haul flight to the comp.

    Long term we're going to need that money. Think of it as an investment.

    The size of their home crowds are remarkable given their on field performances...!

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooper
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #59

    @donsteppa Lets face it SW were never going to be ditched before the RWC

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #60

    Now that was an extremely poor call...SW tackler gets to his feet, falls on the tackled player then plays the ball, gets penalty.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #61

    The resulting backline movement was worth it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooper
    wrote on last edited by
    #62

    DMac sure likes these Japanese goalposts, just needs to sharpen up on his d

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #63

    @donsteppa said in Sunwolves vs Chiefs:

    @kiwimurph my thinking is that - if we had to make a choice of kicking teams out - the comp was a lot better off with a stopover game from/to South Africa than with teams like the Sunwolves and Jaguares adding SFA except travel. Though it does help the remaining four Oz teams in the short run.

    For on field competitiveness the best option would be a pacific islands side - if you could make the finances work.

    Ok that was terrible by Alaimalo.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooper
    wrote on last edited by
    #64

    I could see Polwarts eyes light up then

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by Bovidae
    #65

    @kiwimurph said in Sunwolves vs Chiefs:

    Alaimalo would have to be on the ABs radar.

    I thought he had a poor game - bad one-on-one misses and some tits for hands. He has talent though.

    I like Boshier's work too so I expect him to stay at 6. Ardron is bloody athletic so looks a great option off the bench.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DiceD Offline
    DiceD Offline
    Dice
    wrote on last edited by
    #66

    The Sunwolves haven't improved much from past seasons, for some reason I've heard the media saying that they have(probably because JJ and Brown are coaching them), but the way they've gone this year is no different to the last two years.

    If you look at their results in their first two years compared to this year, there is barely any difference in their trend of results - it's basically an even split of close losses and blowout losses. Last year they actually ran the Chiefs close.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • DiceD Offline
    DiceD Offline
    Dice
    wrote on last edited by
    #67

    TTT had a very Aaron Smith type game. When I first saw him play, I thought he was a Smith clone. Usually it takes about 3/4 years for the real deal halfbacks to get settled in at Super level, so hopefully this is his breakout year.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #68

    @bones said in Sunwolves vs Chiefs:

    @nepia said in Sunwolves vs Chiefs:

    @bones said in Sunwolves vs Chiefs:

    @nepia If it was already in the receivers hands before Leitch released it, how did it travel forward?

    Where did I say that? However, if we follow that reasoning, it's fine for a team to pass the ball forwards in a maul as long as the person passing it forwards doesn't release it until he's got his hands on it?

    If that happened, would it be a forward pass?

    Absolutely.

    It's been in the rule book for a century. Handing the ball to a person in front of you is a forward pass. It does not matter that it never leaves contact.

    In general play it's two offences as a team mate in front of the ball player is offside, and liable for penalty, so taking part in play by touching the ball is definitely out.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by Crucial
    #69

    @chester-draws said in Sunwolves vs Chiefs:

    @bones said in Sunwolves vs Chiefs:

    @nepia said in Sunwolves vs Chiefs:

    @bones said in Sunwolves vs Chiefs:

    @nepia If it was already in the receivers hands before Leitch released it, how did it travel forward?

    Where did I say that? However, if we follow that reasoning, it's fine for a team to pass the ball forwards in a maul as long as the person passing it forwards doesn't release it until he's got his hands on it?

    If that happened, would it be a forward pass?

    Absolutely.

    It's been in the rule book for a century. Handing the ball to a person in front of you is a forward pass. It does not matter that it never leaves contact.

    In general play it's two offences as a team mate in front of the ball player is offside, and liable for penalty, so taking part in play by touching the ball is definitely out.

    I think it has been tidied in the new law book. 'pass' includes handing the ball.
    You cannot deliberately make a forward pass (which it must be if the player is in front). Even if it is touch and go and the ref won't rule as deliberate the there is the option of offside. Both are penalty offences.

    Edit: I guess there is also the option of accidental offside resulting in a scrum (like a normal forward pass) - probably the fairest option

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Dice on last edited by
    #70

    @dice Sunwolves are going to improve unless they can get some alignment with/help from, the Japanese Top League.

    As for TTT he was excellent but it was a game perfectly suited to his game - be nice to see him push for more gametime against decent opposition.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #71

    @nepia said in Sunwolves vs Chiefs:

    @bones said in Sunwolves vs Chiefs:

    @nepia So when the ball left Leitch's hands, it traveled forward? And that was clear and obvious?

    It's about as far from the worst non call ever as you can get.

    Oh FFS, did it go forward from Leitch to try scorer? Yes, because the try scorer was in front of Leitch when he received the ball. If you don't think that is clear and obvious you can borrow my -9 contact lenses if you like.

    Was it the worst non call ever? Sheesh, we all use a little hyperbole on the fern.

    And we all know the real "worst non call ever" even if it happened in a game otherwise expunged from our memories.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

Sunwolves vs Chiefs
Rugby Matches
chiefssunwolves
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.