Sevu Reece - in trouble again
-
@WoodysRFC said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
But Rieko and Akira are the dick heads of NZR, right?
I'm glad someone said it
-
It's telling you're a shit player when even the Cantabs aren't circling the wagons for him.
Can't handle his piss. We all played with a bunch like him (most of the real crumbs are backs too). It's funny to me that just being better at footy doesn't weed them out.
I do think it's delightfully naive that we all still think ABs on general aren't just shithead footballers that most of us played with, just better
-
@No-Quarter said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
I mean we all know why he has been a lock in Razor's AB side despite awaiting sentencing. The All Blacks are a clown show right now.
"but he cares" and he loves his peppermint tea.
High performance environment my arse.
We are an un-meritocratic rabble from the top down.
-
@Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.
Nah that went out the window when Adam Thomson kept getting selected….
-
@ACT-Crusader said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
@Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.
Nah that went out the window when Adam Thomson kept getting selected….
Don't you bring the highlanders into this...
-
@Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
@ACT-Crusader said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
@Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.
Nah that went out the window when Adam Thomson kept getting selected….
Don't you bring the highlanders into this...
I didn’t mention Jimmy Cowan but come to think of it 😉
-
@ACT-Crusader said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
@Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.
Nah that went out the window when Adam Thomson kept getting selected….
whats the story here?
was he trouble? Cant say I recall him being a douchebag bar the John Cena celebration.
-
@Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
@Kruse said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
To be fair, after reading the details of Sevu's first "incident" - and reading between the lines of the witness reports - I had some sympathy. It seemed quite possibly an innocuous incident, but branded with "domestic violence" and therefore pitchforks out.
But a second incident... not sure I can be bothered reading the details of this one, but one way or the other, he hasn't learned lessons.
Plus he's slower than me, so get him out of the All Blacks anyway.I thought he'd knocked/tackled her to the ground and dragged her? The injuries don't sound very innocuous, have I completely misunderstood the meaning of that word?
My reading of it was that he'd been trying to de-escalate a situation between her and others, and had tried to get her to sit down, initially by sitting down himself, then eventually physically pulling her down to sit with him.
The kind of action which a particularly nasty prosecution lawyer of the american kind could force a witness into describing as "pulling her to the ground" and "dragging".
I might have it wrong though - and the fact there is this second incident... yeah, I'm wondering if I was overly optimistic in the first place. -
@Kruse said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
@Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
@Kruse said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
To be fair, after reading the details of Sevu's first "incident" - and reading between the lines of the witness reports - I had some sympathy. It seemed quite possibly an innocuous incident, but branded with "domestic violence" and therefore pitchforks out.
But a second incident... not sure I can be bothered reading the details of this one, but one way or the other, he hasn't learned lessons.
Plus he's slower than me, so get him out of the All Blacks anyway.I thought he'd knocked/tackled her to the ground and dragged her? The injuries don't sound very innocuous, have I completely misunderstood the meaning of that word?
My reading of it was that he'd been trying to de-escalate a situation between her and others, and had tried to get her to sit down, initially by sitting down himself, then eventually physically pulling her down to sit with him.
The kind of action which a particularly nasty prosecution lawyer of the american kind could force a witness into describing as "pulling her to the ground" and "dragging".
I might have it wrong though - and the fact there is this second incident... yeah, I'm wondering if I was overly optimistic in the first place.So what you’re saying is that it was a collapsed brawl?
-
@booboo said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
@sparky said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
No dickheads means no dickheads.
From where does this "no dickheads" policy originate?
I recall "better people make better All Blacks". Some difference in that.
Found this..
-
@booboo said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
@sparky said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
No dickheads means no dickheads.
From where does this "no dickheads" policy originate?
I recall "better people make better All Blacks". Some difference in that.
The Breakers CEO said it about their hiring policy, think it just got “transferred” to ABs.
-
@booboo said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:
@Snowy it's talked a lot in Aussie sport, especially with reference to specific clubs.
I just wondered if it had been conflated. Although @Virgil 's post suggest some basis for applying to the ABs.
pretty sure its a mantra in most NZ sports sides
Could be wrong but im sure its been mentioned with the Black Caps as well.