• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Italy v All Blacks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksitaly
1.1k Posts 87 Posters 14.7k Views
Italy v All Blacks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #325

    @nostrildamus said in Italy v All Blacks:

    And I still don't understand why they play Havili not Lam.

    It would be an admission that they got the original squad selection wrong.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #326

    @Bovidae said in Italy v All Blacks:

    @nostrildamus said in Italy v All Blacks:

    And I still don't understand why they play Havili not Lam.

    It would be an admission that they got the original squad selection wrong.

    Stuff that. Just play the guys that are most capable. No more teacher's pets

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #327

    @KiwiMurph said in Italy v All Blacks:

    And the argument for Havili over Lam in the 23 jersey for this hypothetical backline would be what exactly? Given the 3 players above all cover 10 and 15?

    I think we agree there isn't much reason. Havili is a test 12, not a 13 or a 10, no longer a 15, and we have plenty of ex / part-time 15s.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #328

    @nostrildamus said in Italy v All Blacks:

    @KiwiMurph said in Italy v All Blacks:

    And the argument for Havili over Lam in the 23 jersey for this hypothetical backline would be what exactly? Given the 3 players above all cover 10 and 15?

    I think we agree there isn't much reason. Havili is a test 12, not a 13 or a 10, no longer a 15, and we have plenty of ex / part-time 15s.

    Even that’s optimistic

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #329

    @MN5 said in Italy v All Blacks:

    @nostrildamus said in Italy v All Blacks:

    @KiwiMurph said in Italy v All Blacks:

    And the argument for Havili over Lam in the 23 jersey for this hypothetical backline would be what exactly? Given the 3 players above all cover 10 and 15?

    I think we agree there isn't much reason. Havili is a test 12, not a 13 or a 10, no longer a 15, and we have plenty of ex / part-time 15s.

    Even that’s optimistic

    Yeah I read it again and thought why was I so nice? I don't rate him at 12 either. When he started under Foster I saw the potential but I really don't think he has been good enough in any position he played in to get the selections he has - then again I am no AB coach.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #330

    @KiwiMurph said in Italy v All Blacks:

    @Billy-Tell said in Italy v All Blacks:

    I don’t have such a problem with Havili on the bench. But it does my head in that it’s not

    10 McKenzie
    15 Love
    22 Perofeta (or swap with Love)

    And the argument for Havili over Lam in the 23 jersey for this hypothetical backline would be what exactly? Given the 3 players above all cover 10 and 15?

    I have said this a number of times, I am not a fan of Havilii, but I can get his selection over Lam, at this stage. Lam has not had a lot of time in the midfield, and owing to the way the Blues played he has not had the chance to show he is a ball player. Next year if he plays midfield and gets to show he is at least the equal to Jordie as a passer, then yes, pick him. They'd be fools not to.

    DuluthD KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #331

    @Crazy-Horse said in Italy v All Blacks:

    Lam has not had a lot of time in the midfield

    He's already had 22 first class starts in the midfield. Obviously he has shifted there late in games too.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #332

    @Duluth said in Italy v All Blacks:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Italy v All Blacks:

    Lam has not had a lot of time in the midfield

    He's already had 22 first class starts in the midfield. Obviously he has shifted there late in games too.

    A few more than Sititi at 6

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    wrote on last edited by
    #333

    Considering how troublesome finding a 6 has been, considering he isn't that big and plays at 8, throwing Sititi in there was inspired. Or ballsy. Or desperate. But well done him. I'm also on the Sititi as future AB captain bandwagon. Hope that isn't a jinx.

    MN5M D 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #334

    @Crazy-Horse said in Italy v All Blacks:

    I have said this a number of times, I am not a fan of Havilii, but I can get his selection over Lam, at this stage. Lam has not had a lot of time in the midfield, and owing to the way the Blues played he has not had the chance to show he is a ball player.

    We don't have ball players in the midfield now. Lam has looked good in midfield for Blues (including 3 playoff games), a bad Auckland NPC team and an AB XV game.

    I don't understand the fear at all.

    Meanwhile how many games has Havili played at 13? I don't recall him playing there at all.

    canefanC nostrildamusN 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by
    #335
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #336

    @KiwiMurph said in Italy v All Blacks:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Italy v All Blacks:

    Meanwhile how many games has Havili played at 13? I don't recall him playing there at all.

    It's a poor excuse to justify retaining a player who IMHO doesn't deserve to be there

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #337

    @canefan said in Italy v All Blacks:

    @KiwiMurph said in Italy v All Blacks:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Italy v All Blacks:

    Meanwhile how many games has Havili played at 13? I don't recall him playing there at all.

    It's a poor excuse to justify retaining a player who IMHO doesn't deserve to be there

    Maybe, but it was an attempt to see their reasoning.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #338

    @KiwiMurph said in Italy v All Blacks:

    @Billy-Tell said in Italy v All Blacks:

    I don’t have such a problem with Havili on the bench. But it does my head in that it’s not

    10 McKenzie
    15 Love
    22 Perofeta (or swap with Love)

    And the argument for Havili over Lam in the 23 jersey for this hypothetical backline would be what exactly? Given the 3 players above all cover 10 and 15?

    I think Havili was in the squad and Lam was added later. It would therefore be odd to promote Lam. The coaches also have to think of squad harmony etc. If you parachute players in and play them ahead of original squad picks, Qs will be asked.

    M BonesB canefanC KiwiMurphK 4 Replies Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #339

    @Billy-Tell said in Italy v All Blacks:

    @KiwiMurph said in Italy v All Blacks:

    @Billy-Tell said in Italy v All Blacks:

    I don’t have such a problem with Havili on the bench. But it does my head in that it’s not

    10 McKenzie
    15 Love
    22 Perofeta (or swap with Love)

    And the argument for Havili over Lam in the 23 jersey for this hypothetical backline would be what exactly? Given the 3 players above all cover 10 and 15?

    I think Havili was in the squad and Lam was added later. It would therefore be odd to promote Lam. The coaches also have to think of squad harmony etc. If you parachute players in and play them ahead of original squad picks, Qs will be asked.

    Questions like, why did you pick a below average AB instead of someone who has been much better? Yeah terrible questions, might show how bloody awful their picks have mostly been

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #340

    @Billy-Tell said in Italy v All Blacks:

    @KiwiMurph said in Italy v All Blacks:

    @Billy-Tell said in Italy v All Blacks:

    I don’t have such a problem with Havili on the bench. But it does my head in that it’s not

    10 McKenzie
    15 Love
    22 Perofeta (or swap with Love)

    And the argument for Havili over Lam in the 23 jersey for this hypothetical backline would be what exactly? Given the 3 players above all cover 10 and 15?

    I think Havili was in the squad and Lam was added later. It would therefore be odd to promote Lam. The coaches also have to think of squad harmony etc. If you parachute players in and play them ahead of original squad picks, Qs will be asked.

    That would be rather two faced. Very Foster like.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #341

    @nostrildamus said in Italy v All Blacks:

    Considering how troublesome finding a 6 has been, considering he isn't that big and plays at 8, throwing Sititi in there was inspired. Or ballsy. Or desperate. But well done him. I'm also on the Sititi as future AB captain bandwagon. Hope that isn't a jinx.

    Settle. Let’s just see him continue to play well before putting those expectations round his neck

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by nostrildamus
    #342

    @KiwiMurph said in Italy v All Blacks:

    Meanwhile how many games has Havili played at 13? I don't recall him playing there at

    Good question, I wondered if he had to replace a 13 off the bench once, but I could not find it in stats

    David HAVILI profile and stats

    David HAVILI profile and stats

    David HAVILI : bio, stats, play time, birthdate, height, weight...

    But I do recall reading somewhere they saw him as a replacement at 13? Maybe it is just my poor memory.

    But I don't see how he deserved selection over Lam. I suspect Razor is not so much conservative as loyal, but that isn't a good reason to pick him over Lam (who could be a backup winger, we did not have that many wingers, and wingers in good form).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #343

    @MN5 said in Italy v All Blacks:

    Settle. Let’s just see him continue to play well before putting those expectations round his neck

    I said they should pick Darry, I was the first to name Blackadder "Niggles" and hazarded he'd live up to his nickname. I predicted what would happen if they brought back and played Havili, I said BB isn't in great form and has lost pace and probably confidence, and isn't, probably, our best 10 at getting the backline flowing. I'd even, during the RWC, said they had to bring in Roigard.
    Apart from that chequered past, I'm doing my best to live up to the Fern statement:

    "Awful analysis, incorrect conclusions, zero insight
    Wrong about pretty much everything"

    Let my previous post be read in that light.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by canefan
    #344

    @Billy-Tell said in Italy v All Blacks:

    @KiwiMurph said in Italy v All Blacks:

    @Billy-Tell said in Italy v All Blacks:

    I don’t have such a problem with Havili on the bench. But it does my head in that it’s not

    10 McKenzie
    15 Love
    22 Perofeta (or swap with Love)

    And the argument for Havili over Lam in the 23 jersey for this hypothetical backline would be what exactly? Given the 3 players above all cover 10 and 15?

    I think Havili was in the squad and Lam was added later. It would therefore be odd to promote Lam. The coaches also have to think of squad harmony etc. If you parachute players in and play them ahead of original squad picks, Qs will be asked.

    Like implying you will be parachuting a 10 who has been playing offshore for 3 years you mean?

    1 Reply Last reply
    3

Italy v All Blacks
Rugby Matches
allblacksitaly
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.