@Damo said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
@nzzp said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
Just saw the final try by the Crusaders. Interesting as was talking about it in the previous game - if refs want to call 'tackle', the ball carrier should not be able to continue forward. Players get released and crib a few metres - or in the case below, score a try.
@Damo you reffed, thoughts on this? Looked very very weird to me; I think a comp-wide interpretation of either calling maul when the attacking player's mate joins, or cracking down hard on cribbing metres would be a good solution. Or do both!
https://www.reddit.com/r/rugbyunion/comments/1cqjcwi/controversial_final_try_for_the_crusaders_vs_the/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
I think it is an unusual situation. I did not think it was a mail, because there was not a player from the ball carriers team attached (from memory - I could be wrong). The tacklers ought to have released earlier, but when they got the call to release they did so. Should the ball carrier be able to use the momentum to then go over the line and score?
Personally I think not but per the laws it was probably correct.
I am of view that if a player is reaching out to score the defenders should not have to release to allow the try. As per the laws as written this is not the current position.
I add I have not reffed for 3 years so I am not up to date with the current interpretations/trends.
I should have clicked the link..
I think the tackle was completed before the players joined so it couldn't be a maul.
I think it is an unusual situation but I can't fault the referee for the decision.