SF - Lions v Highlanders
-
<p>only seen extended highlights, but jeez there was some very poor d by the Highlanders, some pretty horrid attempts at tackles.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>That said, I think it is good for the game to have these 2 teams in the final, regardless what happens, we will have a new champion. and if the Lions do get up, they will also be the first non NZ team to win away from home too (I think that is the case) </p>
<p> </p>
<p>But go Canes! </p> -
<p>Dixon had a mare. Too nightmarish to be true. I think he is better than that. But his display on the day could play against him cometh the time.</p>
<p>Squire did not disgrace himself and made the hard yards. But will he be selected as he is only a bench warmer at the Highlanders ?</p> -
So sayeth ye.
-
Watching that game was like watching any test from Joburg when the Boks seem to be full of juice and throw the ball around, kick 60 odd metres and just do some freakish shit. Thankfully the abs usually ride that out but the Landers just weren't in it. Lethargic is the word. The urgency just wasn't there. <br><br>
What I still don't understand is how Dixon just dropped the ball over the line. That could have changed the game.<br><br>
Faddes has always looked like a bloke selected out of the crowd and he sure played like it last night. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="cgrant" data-cid="601891" data-time="1469947523"><p>Dixon had a mare. Too nightmarish to be true. I think he is better than that. But his display on the day could play against him cometh the time.<br>Squire did not disgrace himself and made the hard yards. But will he be selected as he is only a bench warmer at the Highlanders ?</p></blockquote><br>Cane used to get selected when he was mostly a bench warmer at the Chiefs
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="booboo" data-cid="601861" data-time="1469931571">
<div>
<p>Never saw what everybody else has seen in Elliott. However one game doesn't mean you're complete cactus.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Yeah I'm in the same boat. I think he's alright, I just don't rate him anywhere near as highly as others. I suppose having cult hero status like he does tends to help your cause a bit.</p> -
<p>Lions worthy winners.</p>
<p>However, on watching the replay the Clan weren't <em>that</em> bad overall. Halftime score of 17-6 could have been 10-11 but for a big missed tackle by Whitelock in the lead up to the second try and the Dixon drop. Whitelock badly missed Jantjes on way to Skosan try although cancelled out (but not conversion) by soft Faddes response. 25-11. Then another bad missed tackle, this time by Dixon led to Kriel try. 35-11 but on another day might have been 20-16 at that stage. Game lost shape at that stage (about 65) with heavy Lions substitutions. </p>
<p>Naholo and Ben Smith were excellent. Sopoaga also very good. Faddes very mediocre and Aaron Smith ran out of gas mid second half. In forwards Hohneck struggled, and Clan generally overpowered. Elliot Dixon excellent in lineouts but a shocker elsewhere. Greg Pleasant-Tate and Squire added real go forward and mongrel when they arrived.</p>
<p>My money's on the Canes. </p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="African Monkey" data-cid="601937" data-time="1469963363">
<div>
<p>Yeah I'm in the same boat. I think he's alright, I just don't rate him anywhere near as highly as others.<strong> I suppose having cult hero status like he does tends to help your cause a bit.</strong></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Cult hero status didn't really help Duane Monkley .... ;)</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="cgrant" data-cid="601953" data-time="1470000174">
<div>
<p>Was Coltman injured or just leapfrogged by Pleasants-Tate ?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I like how one of the commentators couldn't figure out how to say Tate, first he tried a Maori pronunciation, then an African sounding one before settling on the English sounding Tate like his fellow commentator. He had a decent match.</p> -
<p>Full credit to the lions, simple as that. Highlanders fell off a heaps of tackles and you can blame whatever you want, but I think they just couldn't live with the speed of the high flying Lions.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I guess we'll see if it's travel factor or not this weekend, but either way it should be a cracking final.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="bbarcs" data-cid="602029" data-time="1470010029">
<div>
<p>Anyone in Wellington looking to flick off some tickets - I be keen. Got the heart of a Lion though :biggrin:</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>You'll probably be able to get walk-up tickets, based on the general apathy of Wellingtonians for a play-off game last week. :fishing:</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Smudge" data-cid="602049" data-time="1470013933">
<div>
<p>You'll probably be able to get walk-up tickets, based on the general apathy of Wellingtonians for a play-off game last week. :fishing:</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>It wasn't apathy - they were all hiding under their beds with large bottles of Baxter's cough syrup, multiple packets of Fishermen's Friend and detailed instructions on the Heimlich Manoeuvre.</p> -
<p>Not sure if I am allowed to comment as an infrequent visitor, but how good was Jantjes?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Scored the first try, made the spot tackle to set up the second, sixty meter break to set up the third, perfect cross kick for the fourth and nice little chip for locks to have fun with for the fifth.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Add to that some good tackles on Nadolo and Pleasant-Tate and no memorable mistakes, I would say he was pretty fucking brilliant.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Bones" data-cid="602570" data-time="1470150761">
<div>
<p>That Janse van Rensburg is a fucking monster too.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Bok backline could be more than handy.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>9 De Klerk</p>
<p>10 Jantjes</p>
<p>11 Habana?</p>
<p>12 Van Rensburg</p>
<p>13 Mapoe</p>
<p>14 Combrink</p>
<p>15 Kriel?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>De Allende looks out of form so a call up for Van Rensburg looks inevitable.</p>
<p>Although that backline only has three quota players....</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Don Frye" data-cid="602585" data-time="1470158058">
<div>
<p>Bok backline could be more than handy.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>9 De Klerk</p>
<p>10 Jantjes</p>
<p>11 Habana?</p>
<p>12 Van Rensburg</p>
<p>13 Mapoe</p>
<p>14 Combrink</p>
<p>15 Kriel?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>De Allende looks out of form so a call up for Van Rensburg looks inevitable.</p>
<p>Although that backline only has three quota players....</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Though other Habana that backline has something like 20 caps between them :think: .</p>
<p> </p>
<p>An exciting option from next year might be to play Pollard at 12 outside Jantjes and rotating Van Rensburg and Mapoe at 13. Also can't see De Allende's poor form continuing forever.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Wing remains a concern, but I hope they look at Senatla (sheer speed) and Trevor Ismail (some size) going forward.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I like the idea of Kriel at fullback, but he is still prone to making bad mistakes, Lambie might be useful as a send play-maker at this stage.</p>
